- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump: “The traitors that told the military to disobey my orders should be in jail”
Posted on 11/23/25 at 4:04 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 11/23/25 at 4:04 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Excuse me?
I saw you already got owned trying that.
Have you lost your mind?
1
Posted on 11/23/25 at 4:04 pm to NC_Tigah
Paste #1
quote:
Who has been prosecuted for sedition involving only interpretation when the statement also included clear language that specifically addressed only unlawful and illegal behavior?
Posted on 11/23/25 at 4:05 pm to Jbird
quote:
He knows why Dems did this shite.
To trigger MAGA types so that they act stupidly and emotionally
They achieved that goal
Posted on 11/23/25 at 4:06 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
To trigger MAGA types so that they act stupidly and emotionally
Absolutely.
Worked like a charm.
Posted on 11/23/25 at 4:08 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Who has been prosecuted for sedition involving only interpretation when the statement also included clear language that specifically addressed only unlawful and illegal behavior?
Posted on 11/23/25 at 4:08 pm to SlowFlowPro
No they did it hopeful a 4indypro judge will rule.
Then they can yowl about illegal orders being followed.
A MyLai type sound up for idiots in the press and Dem party.
Because they dgaf about anything that doesn't hurt Drumpf.
You can continue playing 4obstusefakeindy.
Then they can yowl about illegal orders being followed.
A MyLai type sound up for idiots in the press and Dem party.
Because they dgaf about anything that doesn't hurt Drumpf.
You can continue playing 4obstusefakeindy.
Posted on 11/23/25 at 4:09 pm to NC_Tigah
That would be a comparable prosecution. I am quite sure that's never happened in the history of the US
Posted on 11/23/25 at 4:09 pm to SlowFlowPro
Triggering by using enlisted troops
No wonder 4fapping love it.
No wonder 4fapping love it.
Posted on 11/23/25 at 4:10 pm to Jbird
quote:
Triggering by using enlisted troops
No. They just said words.
They told enlisted troops to follow the law and Constitution. What is your problem with that?
Posted on 11/23/25 at 4:11 pm to SlowFlowPro
Lol why would they need to do that?
They start learning that in basic training.
They start learning that in basic training.
Posted on 11/23/25 at 4:15 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Your conjecture aside, you referred to some earlier decisive post. Cite it. The only post I'm aware of appears to have been invented, or at the least, I cannot duplicate the claims.
That would be a comparable prosecution. I am quite sure that's never happened in the history of the US
Obviously there is EXTENSIVE case law addressing guilt associated with deliberately misleading material, if not technical lies. E.g., The Blind Sheikh never once specifically ordered the Trade Center bombing
Posted on 11/23/25 at 4:16 pm to Jbird
quote:
Lol why would they need to do that?
I already told you. To get people associated with MAGA to debase themselves and look looney/irrational/emotional
The OP of this thread is a great example of just that.
Posted on 11/23/25 at 4:17 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
No. They just said words. They told enlisted troops to follow the law and Constitution. What is your problem with that?
The problem is the implication without evidence.
Posted on 11/23/25 at 4:17 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
EXTENSIVE case law addressing guilt associated with deliberately misleading material,
Not applicable as the statements of law were clear, unequivocal, and proper.
quote:
if not technical lies
Even less applicable. See above.
quote:
The Blind Sheikh never once specifically ordered the Trade Center bombing
Did the Shiek specifically say not to bomb the Trade Center in his various statements?
Posted on 11/23/25 at 4:18 pm to djsdawg
quote:
The problem is the implication without evidence.
They made a general statement.
The implication seems to be an angle you're pushing that they did not directly. Again, doing exactly what they wanted you to do. You fell for it. Stop digging yourself a hole and looking stupid. It makes everyone else who isn't a DEM look stupid vicariously.
Posted on 11/23/25 at 4:19 pm to SlowFlowPro
What impact do you think could be the outcome for junior enlisted forces?
Dems are playing a game with the military.
They are hoping for a SFP judge to rule.
Nothing more nothing less then to split the chain of command between judges and the factual chain.
You carry on playing your games 4boasberg
Dems are playing a game with the military.
They are hoping for a SFP judge to rule.
Nothing more nothing less then to split the chain of command between judges and the factual chain.
You carry on playing your games 4boasberg
Posted on 11/23/25 at 4:19 pm to Jbird
quote:
What impact do you think could be the outcome for junior enlisted forces?
That's the individual responsibility of each of them.
Posted on 11/23/25 at 4:20 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Link?
Americans trust their military and intelligence community professionals. But that trust is at risk.
quote:Link?
This administration is pitting our uniformed military against American citizens.
Posted on 11/23/25 at 4:21 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Not applicable as the statements of law were clear, unequivocal, and proper.
Posted on 11/23/25 at 4:22 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Did the Shiek specifically say not to bomb the Trade Center in his various statements?
Page 11 of 18
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News