Started By
Message

re: Trump says maybe the US needs to cut ALL subsidies to General Motors

Posted on 11/28/18 at 9:13 am to
Posted by biglego
Ask your mom where I been
Member since Nov 2007
76305 posts
Posted on 11/28/18 at 9:13 am to
quote:

You think Trump and his policies are anti-manufacturing and anti-labor?


A lot of Trump’s policies are things Bernie and the Dems used to want. Bernie has pushed for tariffs for years. He’s wanted manufacturing to come back to the US for years. But he just doesn’t want Trump to do it.
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
73585 posts
Posted on 11/28/18 at 9:16 am to
quote:

lol, just lol @ calling people idiots unironically, immediately after making claims that are easily shown to be objectively wrong


You have been wrong about everything and have made a fool of yourself many times
Posted by 90proofprofessional
Member since Mar 2004
24445 posts
Posted on 11/28/18 at 9:20 am to
quote:

You have been wrong about everything and have made a fool of yourself many times

lol, just lol at this weak shite

you are like the buzzing of a fly to me
Posted by bama1959
Huntsville, AL
Member since Nov 2008
4558 posts
Posted on 11/28/18 at 9:21 am to
quote:

Can anyone please explain why a corporation that's publicly funded get government subsidies?


GM = Government Motors.

I was never in favor of them getting subsidies. GM was never too big to fail. And we have no reason to continue those subsidies.
Posted by Colonel Flagg
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2010
22797 posts
Posted on 11/28/18 at 9:29 am to
quote:

You seem to fundamentally misunderstand this whole thing. Companies aren't going to dump money into non-profitable products just because they save money elsewhere from tax cuts.


The problems with GM are the unions.
Posted by cahoots
Member since Jan 2009
9134 posts
Posted on 11/28/18 at 9:36 am to
quote:

The problems with GM are the unions.



Yes and no. Sure, unions can definitely make things harder. However, you need to read up on the history of the NUMMI plant to really understand why GM was behind the times and only more recently caught up. Toyota came to the US in the mid 80s and essentially taught GM how to do lean manufacturing correctly. And Toyota sold cars made by US union workers in a jointly owned plant.

So the question becomes - if unions are insurmountable, how did Toyota manage them so effectively?

GM was a poorly run operation. It wasn't the unions. It was them.
This post was edited on 11/28/18 at 9:38 am
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
260477 posts
Posted on 11/28/18 at 9:38 am to
Taxpayer lost 11 billion in the GM bailout. Enough is enough
Posted by MrCarton
Paradise Valley, MT
Member since Dec 2009
20231 posts
Posted on 11/28/18 at 9:42 am to
quote:

So the question becomes - if unions are insurmountable, how did Toyota manage them so effectively?


Well, I'm not arguing your overall point, but had the Japs not foreseen a profitable advantage they could exploit they wouldn't have come in the first place. GM and the Japs were not on equal footing in that scenario at all, and the impacts of unions on GM had been dragging for many years.
Posted by cahoots
Member since Jan 2009
9134 posts
Posted on 11/28/18 at 10:35 am to
quote:

Well, I'm not arguing your overall point, but had the Japs not foreseen a profitable advantage they could exploit they wouldn't have come in the first place. GM and the Japs were not on equal footing in that scenario at all, and the impacts of unions on GM had been dragging for many years.



I'm not arguing that unions don't affect costs. It's just that when you look at what was going on, GM clearly was behind the times.

Consider Toyota's 80s pickups. They were built in Japan (it's not like Japan has cheap labor), shipped to the US, AND subject to the 25% chicken tax. And they still overtook GM in that small truck segment.

Production methods were the #1 difference between the companies.

The unions didn't stop GM from embracing lean manufacturing.
This post was edited on 11/28/18 at 10:37 am
Posted by MrCarton
Paradise Valley, MT
Member since Dec 2009
20231 posts
Posted on 11/28/18 at 10:39 am to
quote:

m not arguing that unions don't affect costs.
right, I'm actually arguing that unions impact how work gets done, and they certainly have an interest in preserving less efficacious methodologies because and their root they want more workers to be in their unions.

Again, you could be right, but it's worth noting GM spent decades under that kind of pressure where Japan likely didnt.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
260477 posts
Posted on 11/28/18 at 10:43 am to
quote:

The unions didn't stop GM from embracing lean manufacturing.


Unions in Japan have a much different relationship with management than American
Posted by 56lsu
jackson mich
Member since Dec 2005
7441 posts
Posted on 11/28/18 at 10:53 am to
get your sick little mind out of the gutter and show all the jobs he has brought to mi. and ohio. can't do it.
Posted by bamarep
Member since Nov 2013
51806 posts
Posted on 11/28/18 at 11:04 am to
Michigan job growth

Ohio job growth


Eat a dick boot licker.


Trump is running circles around that pale power you fricking worship.

He's a fraud. Deal with it.
Posted by WildManGoose
Member since Nov 2005
4568 posts
Posted on 11/28/18 at 11:06 am to
quote:

how many jobs have been lost in any American industry that needs steel except for the people that make it?
I work in an industry that needs steel. We haven't had layoffs. I haven't heard of a single layoff. So, you're wrong. I love dummies who think they're smart.
Posted by 56lsu
jackson mich
Member since Dec 2005
7441 posts
Posted on 11/28/18 at 12:16 pm to
once again where are the auto jobs he told the people in mich and ohio that were coming back, gutter rat.
first pageprev pagePage 9 of 9Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram