Started By
Message

re: Trump promoting a 50 year mortgage. Dave Ramsey will lose his mind. Terrible idea - imo

Posted on 11/10/25 at 1:52 pm to
Posted by plazadweller
South Georgia
Member since Jul 2011
12266 posts
Posted on 11/10/25 at 1:52 pm to
I would hope the average imbecile who enters in a 50 year mortgage has enough sense to know to make payments above the interest/principal in order to get the debt paid off sooner…but yet I know it won’t happen and young people will play the victim
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
135738 posts
Posted on 11/10/25 at 1:53 pm to
quote:

Couldn't you take the savings from renting and use leverage with that and invest over that same time period?
Not with that kind of production. Of course the problem with leverage comes in the other direction where losing more than just your original investment is possible.

But the reason home ownership works so well for most Americans is appreciation is far more likely than depreciation.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
467270 posts
Posted on 11/10/25 at 1:57 pm to
quote:

But the reason home ownership works so well for most Americans is appreciation is far more likely than depreciation.


That expectation is exactly why government policy is so focused on inflating the values of RE.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
135738 posts
Posted on 11/10/25 at 2:37 pm to
quote:

That expectation is exactly why government policy is so focused on inflating the values of RE.
But that has always been the case, with or without government. E.g., NYC has seen multiple RE booms -- mid19th century, late19th century, the roaring 20's, the 1980's, etc. What was government's role in the first three?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
467270 posts
Posted on 11/10/25 at 2:40 pm to
quote:

E.g., NYC has seen multiple RE booms -- mid19th century, late19th century, the roaring 20's, the 1980's, etc.

And they all had successive crashes, no?

Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
135738 posts
Posted on 11/10/25 at 2:54 pm to
quote:

successive crashes, no?
Sure. But the last one in NYC ended less than a decade ago. The spread is normally 40-50 yrs. But your posit is government is driving RE inflation, which has always been there.
Posted by theballguy
Member since Oct 2011
31692 posts
Posted on 11/10/25 at 3:11 pm to
quote:

This is a stable genius move

Lets stop pretending anyone pays off a home now with a 30yr fix


A retarded take. 15 years max and then you throw everything at the rest of it to pay it off (unless the interest rate is below 5% -- then maybe you have some options).
This post was edited on 11/10/25 at 3:14 pm
Posted by theballguy
Member since Oct 2011
31692 posts
Posted on 11/10/25 at 3:17 pm to
quote:

30 year car loans
30 year boat loans

It isn’t crazy to offer a 50 year option on an asset that will most likely appreciate.


I'm cool with that as long as the Fed doesn't originate or guarantee those loans.
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
93991 posts
Posted on 11/10/25 at 3:24 pm to
quote:

A retarded take.


Not really when 97% of ppl dont make it past year 7

I realize that EVERY single person on this board is the exception tho
Posted by Man4others
Member since Aug 2017
2467 posts
Posted on 11/10/25 at 3:30 pm to
quote:

A retarded take. 15 years max and then you throw everything at the rest of it to pay it off (unless the interest rate is below 5% -- then maybe you have some options).


Why would I want to pay off a 5% mortgage when I can take my money, invest it and make 10%?
Posted by theballguy
Member since Oct 2011
31692 posts
Posted on 11/10/25 at 3:37 pm to
quote:

Why would I want to pay off a 5% mortgage when I can take my money, invest it and make 10%?



You're making my point. Re-read.
Posted by Man4others
Member since Aug 2017
2467 posts
Posted on 11/10/25 at 4:03 pm to
quote:

15 years max and then you throw everything at the rest of it to pay it off


"rest of it" = your mortgage balance?
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
135738 posts
Posted on 11/10/25 at 4:26 pm to
quote:

Not really when 97% of ppl dont make it past year 7
The numbers are surprisingly high, but I haven't seen that stat. Link? or hyperbole?
Posted by theballguy
Member since Oct 2011
31692 posts
Posted on 11/10/25 at 6:37 pm to
I guess you didn't read my part about the 5% or less ... sigh.
Posted by Zgeo
Baja Oklahoma
Member since Jul 2021
3207 posts
Posted on 11/10/25 at 6:39 pm to
So you pay 5 times the price of the house ….wtf
Posted by billjamin
Houston
Member since Jun 2019
16776 posts
Posted on 11/10/25 at 6:44 pm to
quote:

I'm cool with that as long as the Fed doesn't originate or guarantee those loans.

If the market wanted it and it was reasonable it would already exist. The only way this happens is with a govt backstop.
Posted by rebeloke
Member since Nov 2012
17065 posts
Posted on 11/10/25 at 9:35 pm to
quote:

Couldn't you take the savings from renting and use leverage with that and invest over that same time period? You can just as easily come out ahead if variance is in your favor this way, too, without the downside risk of outlier maintenance costs or the house depreciating and you being stuck in a no-equity situation for decades.

Anything is possible. Here’s a good article that wrestles with this very subject.

https://www.npr.org/2023/01/09/1147453685/house-housing-property-prices-to-buy-rent

Overall home ownership is a part of the American dream and a way of building wealth for most families.
Posted by GeauxBurrow312
Member since Nov 2024
5247 posts
Posted on 11/10/25 at 9:43 pm to
quote:

people will never build significant equity in their housing on a 50 year mortgage, unless they make it 35+ years. There will be almost no equity in the 1st 20 years. Can you imagine paying for something for 20 years and having no equity?


Equity is important, but 50 year notes wouldnt be completely worthless for home buyers. If you live in an area where rent prices are soaring, it locks in what you pay monthly.

Where it gets dicey is it would be incredibly easy for someone to go underwater on a 50 year note. If you need a 50 year mortgage, you probably aren't putting much down. The cost of PMI on that would make my first point useless
Posted by dovehunter
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2014
1729 posts
Posted on 11/10/25 at 10:08 pm to
Buy a house stupid. Don't rent unless you have a house facing the ocean and you rent it once or twice a year..
.
This is a no brainer. Can you get burned? Maybe a little. Can you make a life changing investment? Much more likely..
Posted by GeauxBurrow312
Member since Nov 2024
5247 posts
Posted on 11/10/25 at 10:50 pm to
quote:

This is a no brainer. Can you get burned? Maybe a little. Can you make a life changing investment? Much more likely..


If you can put enough down to not need PMI you probably arent interested in a 50 year mortgage. If you need PMI the monthly cost of owning would exceed renting.

It just doesnt work in practice
Jump to page
Page First 21 22 23 24 25 ... 28
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 23 of 28Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram