Started By
Message

re: Trump met with enlisted troops only on Afghanistan

Posted on 12/27/19 at 8:04 pm to
Posted by Saint Alfonzo
Member since Jan 2019
28418 posts
Posted on 12/27/19 at 8:04 pm to
quote:

These deployments have readiness value, the loss compared to when deploy an unprepared force is a small fraction.


This is dumb as shite. You win wars by training to win wars. Combat readiness is a result of effective training. Combat fatigue comes from constant deployment.
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 12/27/19 at 8:06 pm to
quote:

Everyone in the Navy believes it.


No, they don't.

Were/are you Navy?

I know a lot of Cheifs and officers who would be disappointed in your misrepresentation, including my COO.
Posted by Sentrius
Fort Rozz
Member since Jun 2011
64757 posts
Posted on 12/27/19 at 8:08 pm to
quote:

No it isn't.


The Bush admin had a goal of "spreading democracy and western living" while installing a puppet government in a country full of people that prefer living in 5th century stone ages and is opposed to what we wanted to do.

How is that not trying to subjugate them?

That way has brought us nothing suffering, pain and misery with trillions of our tax dollars lost.

quote:

The United States isn't the fricking Roman Empire.


We sure as hell are following the trajectory of their collapse with endless foreign conflicts and out of control immigration.
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
82188 posts
Posted on 12/27/19 at 8:11 pm to
I was in the Navy for a loooong time.

quote:

I know a lot of Cheifs and officers who would be disappointed in your misrepresentation
bullshite.

Nothing I have said is even controversial. It is just what is.

I had one conversation with my Div O in 4 years on one ship.

You think he had a firm grasp on his people?

You can catch a Captain's mast if you get too friendly with an Officer.

We ate dinner at my Chief's pad every time we pulled back into homeport, on that same ship

I don't know a single sailor who has much of a different experience.
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 12/27/19 at 8:13 pm to
quote:

The Bush admin had a goal of "spreading democracy and western living" while installing a puppet government in a country full of people that prefer living in 5th century stone ages and is opposed to what we wanted to do.


The stated goals of the Department of Defense are those that I highlighted earlier.

Your Dubya melt is irrelevant to me.
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 12/27/19 at 8:15 pm to
quote:

bullshite.


Ok, I'll tell him some dude on the Internet who did a "loooong time" knows more than him.

quote:

It is often said, "Chiefs don't run the Navy, they make the Navy run."




You should've spent more time in the Navy.
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
35156 posts
Posted on 12/27/19 at 8:17 pm to
quote:

in a country full of people that prefer living in 5th century stone ages and is opposed to what we wanted to do.

And a people who are constantly living with the threat and fear of being turned into a red cloud by a fellow countryman for even thinking about riding with the ideas introduced there by the U.S.A.

Little difficult to get them to do right under those circumstances.
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
82188 posts
Posted on 12/27/19 at 8:21 pm to
quote:

Chiefs don't run the Navy, they make the Navy run.
Sure, I have no problem with it that way.

Either way serves my purpose in this conversation.

quote:

You should've spent more time in the Navy.
Why?

quote:

Ok, I'll tell him some dude on the Internet who did a "loooong time" knows more than him.
Do as you will.

Nobody that has ever served in the Navy would disagree with anything I have said in this thread.

Not one.
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 12/27/19 at 8:25 pm to
quote:

Either way serves my purpose in this conversation.


Not really.

One, the correct one, directly supports what I've said.

quote:

Why?


So you'd know something useful and accurate about the Navy.

quote:

Nobody that has ever served in the Navy would disagree with anything I have said in this thread.

Not one.


I don't know anyone who would agree with you.
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
82188 posts
Posted on 12/27/19 at 8:40 pm to
quote:

Not really.

One, the correct one, directly supports what I've said.
Neither supports what you said.

But just to play your game:

quote:

Chiefs Run the Navy, CNO Tells Senior Enlisted Academy
LINK

quote:

Chiefs have been respected as the backbone and anchor of the Navy for more than a century. It is widely and fondly known among retirees and other civilians whom I have encountered, that “Chiefs run the Navy”. I accept the praise with humility and generally reply that it “is all in a day’s work.” Because I know the history and the mission of THE CHIEF: turning young scared kids into fighting seafarers, to being the voice of reason when the wardroom is unanimously praising the executive officer’s “great idea.” The position and mission of the Chief Petty Officer and the need for that differentiation and separation on afloat commands is unique in the armed services. Recent trends in training to square with those differences have largely been productive.


LINK

quote:

Effectively running and fighting a warship relies on bridging the gap between officers and enlisted personnel. It was from this need that the creation of the rank of chief petty officer was born.
LINK

If you prefer the other variant, that's fine. They make it run by being the bridge between enlisted and officer. That is their job.

i am not doubting you know a couple of former sailors. I am saying your recollection of their positions on the interrelation between enlisted and officers is either flawed, or made up whole cloth.

quote:

So you'd know something useful and accurate about the Navy.
Such as?

quote:

I don't know anyone who would agree with you.

Then you don't know anyone in the Navy

Or any armed services, really. Want to know what's up with your soldiers or Marines? Ask your SFC or Gunney.

Always been that way, always will be that way.

It is damn near illegal to be friends with an officer as an enlisted. It is called fraternization, and it is treated harshly and swiftly.
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 12/27/19 at 8:53 pm to
quote:

If you prefer the other variant




It isn't another variant. It contradicts your assertion.

quote:

But just to play your game:


Sure, let's play.

quote:

"The officers run the Navy, but the chiefs make the Navy run," explained Command Master Chief Mike Bates of Pensacola's Center for Information Warfare Training at Corry Station. 


I know Mike, and many others like him. So much for your "no one ever" bullshite.

quote:

Such as?


Literally anything. Like I said...

quote:

Then you don't know anyone in the Navy

Or any armed services, really. Want to know what's up with your soldiers or Marines? Ask your SFC or Gunney.


Wrong again.

I spent a loooooooooooooong time in the Marine Corps.

quote:

Gunney


Jesus Christ.

Well, you certainly have the aptitude of a Chief.
Posted by antibarner
Member since Oct 2009
26156 posts
Posted on 12/27/19 at 9:23 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 12/31/19 at 9:06 pm
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
42339 posts
Posted on 12/27/19 at 9:59 pm to
quote:

Nobody that has ever served in the Navy would disagree with anything I have said in this thread. 

Not one.


I won't be that definitive. I will give a review of my time in the Navy (mid to late 80's). My captain(s) (plural) were obviously in charge, however, they didn't get involved much in day to day operations. The POD would be put out by him. He (they) would relay info to his (their) officer corps and they would tell their respective chiefs. Then they put us to work. The Captain trusted that the job got done by allowing the chiefs a large degree of oversight. The line officers were basically liasons between the chiefs and the Captain. The officer "in charge" of our department was a grade A dipshit. Honestly, the only officer's on my ship that seemed like they had a clue were in engineering. It is what it is. It was the Captain's ship, but the chief's truly did manage day to day operations. FWIW, my experience may be different than others as I was on a Spruance class destroyer with a crew of 250 give or take. Other ships may have had a different environment, and as a result, a totally different set up.
Just my .02.
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 12/27/19 at 10:13 pm to
quote:

You won't tell anyone what your way is.


Nah. Just you and those like you.

quote:

At least I advocate for something.


I could advocate that we cover the whole country in Easy Cheese. That would make as much sense. It would actually be more effective, though.

Yeah, let's go with that. Cover Afghanistan in Easy Cheese.
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
35156 posts
Posted on 12/27/19 at 10:17 pm to
If the U.S. taxpayer bears the burden of the pricetag on the cheese, I'm out.

Otherwise, I'm in.
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 12/27/19 at 10:18 pm to
We'll get Pakistan to pay for it.
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
35156 posts
Posted on 12/27/19 at 10:25 pm to
I like it. Reduce aid to Pakistan in the amount of the cost of the cheese.
Posted by antibarner
Member since Oct 2009
26156 posts
Posted on 12/27/19 at 10:51 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 12/31/19 at 9:07 pm
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 12/27/19 at 10:53 pm to
I'll never entertain the ideas of someone who thinks erasing an entire country with nuclear weapons is a good idea.

Deal with that however you need to deal with it.
Posted by antibarner
Member since Oct 2009
26156 posts
Posted on 12/27/19 at 10:54 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 12/31/19 at 9:07 pm
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram