- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump Lawyer diGenova to Take Over Miami Grand Conspiracy Probe
Posted on 4/18/26 at 8:41 pm to FLTech
Posted on 4/18/26 at 8:41 pm to FLTech
quote:
Name some that have not been proven right.
Trump being the antichrist
Trump being a pawn of Epstein
The Dossier/Russian Collusion
All the 5G/Covid ones
0
Posted on 4/18/26 at 8:43 pm to David_DJS
quote:
How does this work? Who determines what's an executive function
You just look at the core roles of the executive.
Obama heads all of the intelligence agencies and all of their functions are executive functions. He's 100% immune for any actions taken in this sphere, which includes the allegations alleged.
quote:
and is there any limitation to that immunity?
Not if it's a core duty.
quote:
Absolute Immunity: Applies to "conclusive and preclusive" core constitutional powers. This immunity exists regardless of the president's motive, even if actions are alleged to be part of a conspiracy or done for a corrupt purpose.
quote:
Presumptive Immunity: Applies to other official acts falling within the "outer perimeter" of official responsibility.
Posted on 4/18/26 at 8:45 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Mueller was appointed by Trump's admin.
So is it who appointed him, or the SOL?
Posted on 4/18/26 at 8:46 pm to AlterEd
People still doing this Q nonsense? 
Posted on 4/18/26 at 8:49 pm to PastorJ
quote:
People still doing this Q nonsense?
Yeah. The White House and the Department of Labor.
I just like pointing out when Q said shite that seems to have correlation with what is happening today. Which happens quite often.
Posted on 4/18/26 at 8:49 pm to Screaming Viking
quote:
So is it who appointed him, or the SOL?
What a strange question. I'll try to educate you.
To get around the SOL (and venue/jurisdiction rules), they're arguing a conspiracy. They're citing Mueller's appointment as a node in that conspiracy to connect that behavior prior to and successive to the appointment.
Who appointed Mueller kills the ability to rationally argue that's a node in the conspiracy. The fact Mueller gave Trump one of his biggest Ws in Trump's 1st admin completely destroys the argument.
Posted on 4/18/26 at 9:02 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
You just look at the core roles of the executive.
Obama heads all of the intelligence agencies and all of their functions are executive functions. He's 100% immune for any actions taken in this sphere, which includes the allegations alleged
It doesn't matter what the agency (or executive) is doing? That seems off and seems to suggest there is nothing the CIA can do that's illegal.
Posted on 4/18/26 at 9:02 pm to AlterEd
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. quote:
BREAKING: A senior DOJ official told me hard-charging new Russiagate hoax prosecutor Joe diGenova was set to be hired a year ago but "[Deputy AG] Todd [Blanche] didn't let it happen." "It was supposed to be done in the first months of the administration, but Todd blocked it," the official said. "POTUS is forcing action."
DiGenova, who starts Monday in the Southern District of Florida where a grand jury is hearing a "grand conspiracy" case targeting John Brennan and other suspected anti-Trump Russiagate co-conspirators, will have the title of "counselor to the attorney general." The US attorney there is working under special Sec. 515 authority.
Blanche needs to be replaced ASAP.
Posted on 4/18/26 at 9:10 pm to David_DJS
quote:
That seems off and seems to suggest there is nothing the CIA can do that's illegal.
The CIA =\= the President
But how far this immunity extends to following direct orders is yet to be determined.
Posted on 4/18/26 at 9:16 pm to David_DJS
The CIA runs drugs, money, weapons, overthrows countries, and basically does what it wants. There is basically nothing the CIA does that is illegal.
Posted on 4/18/26 at 9:19 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The CIA =\= the President
But as long as the president is onboard, the CIA = the President where the legality of its actions are concerned?
Posted on 4/18/26 at 9:21 pm to David_DJS
quote:
But as long as the president is onboard, the CIA = the President where the legality of its actions are concerned?
quote:
But how far this immunity extends to following direct orders is yet to be determined.
Posted on 4/18/26 at 9:22 pm to David_DJS
Posted on 4/18/26 at 9:27 pm to SlowFlowPro
Yes, I recall - but I'm bringing this back to the president and who decides what's an executive function. I think you're arguing (telll me if I've misread) that Obama and possibly/likely CIA officials involved, can run dirty tricks designed to weaken the next president.
Posted on 4/18/26 at 9:27 pm to AlterEd
Why is Blanche the acting AG if he was blocking this guy from taking down Brennan all along?
Posted on 4/18/26 at 9:29 pm to David_DJS
quote:
that Obama and possibly/likely CIA officials involved, can run dirty tricks designed to weaken the next president.
Is it a dirty trick or is it the deliberative process?
Posted on 4/18/26 at 9:30 pm to boosiebadazz
I don't know. But there is video in this article of diGenova explaining why the case needs to be brought in Florida.
Just the News
Because the Mar-a-Lago raid was one of the first outcomes of the conspiracy to violate Donald Trump's civil rights.
Just the News
Because the Mar-a-Lago raid was one of the first outcomes of the conspiracy to violate Donald Trump's civil rights.
This post was edited on 4/18/26 at 9:32 pm
Posted on 4/18/26 at 9:33 pm to boosiebadazz
Neither likely matters when you introduce “risk of national security”. That gives the government the full weight to topple foreign entities or destroy Joe Breaux in Houma. FISA being a good example. Also why I find it interesting Trump hasn’t removed this tool. It’s the perfect double-edged sword for any leader. They’re not going to roll back that power once they have used it.
Posted on 4/18/26 at 9:35 pm to David_DJS
quote:
I think you're arguing (telll me if I've misread) that Obama and possibly/likely CIA officials involved, can run dirty tricks designed to weaken the next president.
Did you forget these stories after the ruling?
The Nation: The President Can Now Assassinate You, Officially
The Hill: A frightening thought experiment: A murderous president with criminal immunity
This post was edited on 4/18/26 at 9:36 pm
Posted on 4/18/26 at 9:36 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Obama heads all of the intelligence agencies and all of their functions are executive functions. He's 100% immune for any actions taken in this sphere, which includes the allegations alleged.
So let's assume that Bronco is 100% accurate in what he's posted. It was a concerted effort, based on known lies/distortions, to subvert Trump's presidency.
That's A-OK, nothing to see here?
Page 4 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News