- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump just tweeted he will release full transcript
Posted on 9/24/19 at 3:07 pm to Spirit Of Aggieland
Posted on 9/24/19 at 3:07 pm to Spirit Of Aggieland
quote:
Imagination isn’t really a strong argument.
And here you sit basing an argument on hearsay? lmao...
Simply cannot make this shite up... putz...
Posted on 9/24/19 at 3:07 pm to Spirit Of Aggieland
quote:
imagine? Haha.
Imagination isn’t really a strong argument
What is it you think even in your wildest dreams a hearsay complainant Can add to a full transcript of the call?
ROFLMAO
Posted on 9/24/19 at 3:07 pm to Spirit Of Aggieland
quote:
Well if it was a setup, that is even more reason for Congress to see the whistleblower complaint
Moving the goalposts/?
If he releases the entire transcript of the call in question, what does it matter what the complain says? Go ahead and release it, who give a flying F
Secondly, didn’t it come out that the whistleblower hadn’t even actually heard the call, just that he heard rumors that this took place?
This post was edited on 9/24/19 at 3:09 pm
Posted on 9/24/19 at 3:08 pm to Spirit Of Aggieland
quote:
False. Releasing the whistleblower complaint to Congress along with the transcript(s) would be full disclosure....Not arguing whether it’s against procedures but not against the law.
If the complaint is released, the person's identity should be revealed as well.
Posted on 9/24/19 at 3:08 pm to The Maj
But serious question ...
Who actually stated that the complaint was investigated and found to be invalid?
Who actually stated that the complaint was investigated and found to be invalid?
Posted on 9/24/19 at 3:08 pm to ShortyRob
Remember Shorty, it's a pattern of conduct lol.
Posted on 9/24/19 at 3:08 pm to Lsut81
quote:
If he releases the entire transcript of the call in question, what does it matter what the complain says?
I keep asking the same question...
Posted on 9/24/19 at 3:09 pm to ShortyRob
No need to speculate. Just bring it out into the open.
Posted on 9/24/19 at 3:09 pm to Lsut81
quote:
release it, who give a flying F
Secondly, didn’t it come out that the whistleblower hadn’t even actually heard the call, just that he heard rumors that this took place
We need to hear the rumor version of the phone call!!!!
The actual version isn't enough!!!
Said the pathetic desperate liberal
Posted on 9/24/19 at 3:09 pm to Spirit Of Aggieland
quote:
o need to speculate. Just bring it out into the open.
Bring what? He doesn't claim to have even heard the call
Posted on 9/24/19 at 3:10 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
We need to hear the rumor version of the phone call!!!!
I mean...call me dense, but that's the argument, right?
Posted on 9/24/19 at 3:10 pm to GeauxTigerTM
Basically if he releases the transcript he has called their bluff and so now they are desperately trying to salvage themselves
it's going to be hilarious to hear them argue that the second hand version of what was said in the phone call is more accurate than the actual phone call
ROFLMAO
it's going to be hilarious to hear them argue that the second hand version of what was said in the phone call is more accurate than the actual phone call
ROFLMAO
Posted on 9/24/19 at 3:11 pm to Spirit Of Aggieland
quote:
Who actually stated that the complaint was investigated and found to be invalid?
Do you honestly believe the Director of National Intelligence is going to investigate a whistleblower complaint and deem it credible when the complaint is based on hearsay? Especially when it involves a sitting POTUS?
Like I said before, you fricks are sitting here dreaming up shite and bitching about a full release of the transcript in question...
Cannot make this shite up... lmao... you are a retarded putz...
Posted on 9/24/19 at 3:11 pm to Spirit Of Aggieland
quote:
Who actually stated that the complaint was investigated and found to be invalid?
The scope of whistleblower protections is very, very restrictive. One only need look at the IC's treatment of past whistleblowers to confirm this. Yet all of a sudden a whistleblower's complaint, based on hearsay, is a credible allegation? This is more of the same bs.
Posted on 9/24/19 at 3:11 pm to ShortyRob
Just slam dunk it then. Show the complaint, then show how it was completely false.
Not this “I imagine” or “why would it” bullshite
Not this “I imagine” or “why would it” bullshite
Posted on 9/24/19 at 3:11 pm to ShortyRob
And I will say it again
the Democrats are going to demand to hear from The whistleblower while simultaneously fighting the release of the full transcript
You can take that s*** to the bank
the Democrats are going to demand to hear from The whistleblower while simultaneously fighting the release of the full transcript
You can take that s*** to the bank
Posted on 9/24/19 at 3:11 pm to Spirit Of Aggieland
quote:
No need to speculate. Just bring it out into the open.
And that's what Trump is doing.
Posted on 9/24/19 at 3:13 pm to Spirit Of Aggieland
quote:
Just slam dunk it then. Show the complaint, then show how it was completely false
I'm not saying the complaint was false
There's only one of two things that will occur
The complainants version of the phone call will match the phone call or the complainant will have been shown to be lying
Either way the phone call is what you're after
Unless of course you really aren't after the phone call
Which let's be honest that's what's going on here
You guys are scared shittless of that transcript
Posted on 9/24/19 at 3:13 pm to Spirit Of Aggieland
quote:
Just slam dunk it then.
The transcript does that.
Bless your retarded aggie heart... I swear, I knew aggie produced some peter puffers, but you fricks are taking the cake on the dumbass too...
Posted on 9/24/19 at 3:13 pm to Centinel
Glad to hear that he is bringing the complaint out into the open and debunking it. Looking forward to Congress confirming they have received it.
Popular
Back to top



0





