- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump just tweeted he will release full transcript
Posted on 9/24/19 at 3:14 pm to SCLibertarian
Posted on 9/24/19 at 3:14 pm to SCLibertarian
Is "I heard it on the grapevine" even really whistleblowing?
LOL
LOL
Posted on 9/24/19 at 3:15 pm to Spirit Of Aggieland
quote:
Glad to hear that he is bringing the complaint out into the open and debunking it. Looking forward to Congress confirming they have received
Just admit you don't want to see the transcript
Everyone in here can see that's true at this point
Posted on 9/24/19 at 3:15 pm to Spirit Of Aggieland
quote:
Show the complaint, then show how it was completely false.
That won't matter to the democrats, and you damn well know it.
Why release a complaint based on hearsay when you can release the actual transcripts? Especially if even though you release the transcripts, the democrats and media will ignore it and focus on the hearsay?
There is absolutely zero reason to release the complaint. Both legally and politically.
But you want it released for the same reason the dems and msm do...to focus on the hearsay and bury the facts.
You're just as big of a fricking hyperpartisan hack as they are.
Posted on 9/24/19 at 3:16 pm to ShortyRob
Trump should change his mind.
Nah, I decided to not release the transcript.
Nah, I decided to not release the transcript.
Posted on 9/24/19 at 3:16 pm to ShortyRob
I sure as hell want to know if the complaint is really just, “I heard it through the grapevine”. So let’s see it. Simple. I don’t want someone else’s opinion about that.
Posted on 9/24/19 at 3:17 pm to ShortyRob
I want to see the transcript(s) and the complaint
Posted on 9/24/19 at 3:17 pm to Spirit Of Aggieland
quote:
“I heard it through the grapevine”
Already been stated by multiple sources and the media in general... of course that shite flew right over your head...
Posted on 9/24/19 at 3:18 pm to The Maj
What media? You don’t believe the media...
Posted on 9/24/19 at 3:18 pm to Spirit Of Aggieland
quote:
I sure as hell want to know if the complaint is really just, “I heard it through the grapevine
Literally no one even denies that the complainant didn't hear the actual call
Are you really this f****** stupid
At least show up to the thread informed
Posted on 9/24/19 at 3:19 pm to Spirit Of Aggieland
quote:
I want to see the transcript(s) and the complaint
I know you don't. The Democrats realize this transcript is trouble
The second they start fighting it you will be in here supporting their fight
Posted on 9/24/19 at 3:19 pm to Spirit Of Aggieland
CNN defense force now saying that this "wasn't the only call" and that it "doesn't matter" if there was no explicit quid pro quo.
Unreal.
Unreal.
Posted on 9/24/19 at 3:20 pm to Cs
quote:
and that it "doesn't matter" if there was no explicit quid pro quo.
Of course it doesn't matter. The narrative is all that matters.
And the narrative is that the Orange Man is very, very bad.
Posted on 9/24/19 at 3:21 pm to Centinel
The narrative certainly isn’t “most transparent President ever”...
Posted on 9/24/19 at 3:21 pm to Spirit Of Aggieland
quote:
What media? You don’t believe the media...
Try Google bitch...
Posted on 9/24/19 at 3:21 pm to Spirit Of Aggieland
quote:
You’re arguing that there must be a statute that requires this information to be provided?
Fact of the matter is the executive branch is withholding a whistleblower complaint from Congress.
Those pesky statutes. Unfortunately, that how those pesky laws work.
quote:
Maguire told lawmakers as much in a Sept. 13 letter, asserting that the complaint “concerned conduct by someone outside the Intelligence Community and did not relate to any ‘intelligence activity within the responsibility and authority of the DNI.’ ”
“The complaint therefore did not fall within the statutory framework governing reporting matters of ‘urgent concern’ to Congress,” Maguire wrote.
Unless you can cite another whistleblower statute that would require the executive branch to turnover the complaint, congress has no right to demand the complaint.
That's how that pesky separation of powers works.
Posted on 9/24/19 at 3:21 pm to Cs
quote:
CNN defense force now saying that this "wasn't the only call" and that it "doesn't matter" if there was no explicit quid pro quo.
Sometimes it doesn't matter and context does
quote:
Will no one rid me of this turbulent priest? is an utterance attributed to Henry II of England, which led to the death of Thomas Becket, the Archbishop of Canterbury, in 1170. While it was not expressed as an order, it caused four knights to travel from Normandy to Canterbury, where they killed Becket.
Posted on 9/24/19 at 3:22 pm to Spirit Of Aggieland
quote:
The narrative certainly isn’t “most transparent President ever”...
...as Trump agrees to release unredacted transcripts of privileged information that he has no legal compulsion to provide.
Posted on 9/24/19 at 3:23 pm to Cs
quote:
that it "doesn't matter" if there was no explicit quid pro quo.
So now merely talking to a foreign leader is a crime.
Posted on 9/24/19 at 3:23 pm to Cs
quote:
CNN defense force now saying that this "wasn't the only call" and that it "doesn't matter" if there was no explicit quid pro quo
That's the tell
They know their f*****
Posted on 9/24/19 at 3:24 pm to SCLibertarian
quote:
So now merely talking to a foreign leader is a crime.
I am beginning to think that anything Trump does or does not do is a "crime" in their eyes...
Popular
Back to top


1






