- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump internal numbers released! Well.... I don't know what to say
Posted on 11/2/20 at 2:57 pm to Indefatigable
Posted on 11/2/20 at 2:57 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
reddest part of the population in a deep blue state is meaningless.
Yeah LA and SD are super red
You are just proving me right yet again. Clown poster
1
Posted on 11/2/20 at 2:58 pm to SDVTiger
quote:
You are just proving me right yet again.
We will easily see who is right tomorrow, unless you continue to hedge and state that its mail in ballots that will drag Biden across the line in California
Why not a straight up ban bet through Inauguration Day on the statewide result in CA? I'll even spot you 15% as I stated earlier in the thread. If you aren't trolling and truly think CA is in play, youd take the bet.
This post was edited on 11/2/20 at 2:59 pm
Posted on 11/2/20 at 2:58 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
Wait, so the thread you started on "Trump internal numbers" contains ZERO actual internal numbers and two oblique references to turnout based purely on 2016 vote totals? Interesting.
LOL.. such a dumb arse.
You are seriously just dumb. Bill is showing you What the current numbers are and compared it to 2016. Then he specifically is telling you how many votes FROM THE INTERNAL NUMBERS they are expecting.
Dickhead!
This post was edited on 11/2/20 at 3:00 pm
Posted on 11/2/20 at 2:59 pm to LSURulzSEC
quote:
I’m really wanting New Hampshire and Minnesota...
me too
Posted on 11/2/20 at 2:59 pm to Indefatigable
So LA and SD are red parts of the state?
Yes or No?
Yes or No?
Posted on 11/2/20 at 2:59 pm to Janky
I need NH to hit for my predictit
Posted on 11/2/20 at 3:00 pm to Indefatigable
These aren’t internals. It’s actual votes cast and who each side has left to vote
Posted on 11/2/20 at 3:00 pm to Jjdoc
quote:
The he specifically is telling you how many votes FROM THE INTERNAL NUMBERS they are expecting.
Where is that specified in his tweets? I must have missed that. From my reading, he is purely extrapolating the early votes by registration with the reported totals by registration from 2016.
Posted on 11/2/20 at 3:00 pm to Indefatigable
quote:He's a delusional latino who wants everyone to believe that Latinos are going to win this election for Trump. He also has a low IQ.
I just find the OP's constant lying and SDVTiger's trolling about California to be objectionable
This post was edited on 11/2/20 at 3:01 pm
Posted on 11/2/20 at 3:00 pm to Lsujacket66
quote:
These aren’t internals. It’s actual votes cast and who each side has left to vote
I'm very aware. The OP however is not
Posted on 11/2/20 at 3:01 pm to Pecker
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/14/21 at 7:40 am
Posted on 11/2/20 at 3:01 pm to Indefatigable
quote:Yeah the title is misleading why does GW pundit Jim Hoft do this? The title should be Trump lined up to mirror 2016-this is good news.
Absolutely nothing was released. OP linked nothing other than a story with tweets from Bill Stepian where Stepian is breaking down the early vote numbers and comparing them with 2016. Nothing in the OP is related to or discloses the Trump campaign internal polling numbers
It is a EV comparison to 2016
Trump is mirroring 2016 which is good news. But I say he takes a few more States.
Posted on 11/2/20 at 3:01 pm to SDVTiger
quote:
So LA and SD are red parts of the state?
Neither city proper is a red portion of the state, no. But some of the state's reddest areas (with an appreciable population) are east of LA and SD and in their metro areas. Of course other areas in the NE are "more red" but the lower population totals in some of those precincts lessen their impact.
This post was edited on 11/2/20 at 3:05 pm
Posted on 11/2/20 at 3:03 pm to Janky
some folks respond better to a pat on the head. Others respond better to a kick in the pants.
Posted on 11/2/20 at 3:03 pm to SDVTiger
quote:You don't have to lie. It's not something to be ashamed of
I'm not Latino
You talk about low iq
Posted on 11/2/20 at 3:04 pm to Indefatigable
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/14/21 at 7:37 am
Posted on 11/2/20 at 3:05 pm to SDVTiger
quote:
Yeah you have no idea what you are talking about
Then please educate me. Where are all of the Republicans that are going to send Trump all 55 of California's Electoral Votes?
They aren't in Southern California, apparently, and they are not in the northern valley, apparently, so where exactly are they?
Why not just take the bet on the statewide result if you feel so strongly about it?
This post was edited on 11/2/20 at 3:06 pm
Posted on 11/2/20 at 3:05 pm to PT24-7
Baiting them.
Posted on 11/2/20 at 3:06 pm to Jjdoc
The title is misleading why does GW pundit Jim Hoft do this? The title should be Trump lined up to mirror 2016-this is good news.
Posted on 11/2/20 at 3:07 pm to Jjdoc
Anyone paying attention could tell that the internal numbers from both sides pointed to a huge Trump win, why else run a throwaway ticket like braindead Biden and HeelsUp?
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News