Started By
Message

re: Trump has surged to a new high

Posted on 10/21/24 at 4:50 pm to
Posted by Fishhead
Elmendorf, TX
Member since Jan 2008
12502 posts
Posted on 10/21/24 at 4:50 pm to
quote:

Froman
It's not saying he's getting 65% of the vote. He has a 65% chance of winning. Keep up
Posted by OWLFAN86
Erotic Novelist
Member since Jun 2004
196505 posts
Posted on 10/21/24 at 4:51 pm to
quote:

Hope this is true:
Minnesota, New Mexico, Virginia, and New Hampshire as only "safe Harris."



Trump is not going to put enough money into New Mexico to flip it

but they could and it might
Posted by CAD703X
Liberty Island
Member since Jul 2008
93254 posts
Posted on 10/21/24 at 4:52 pm to
fricking nebraska
Posted by Mandtgr47
Member since Aug 2024
7918 posts
Posted on 10/21/24 at 4:53 pm to
quote:

You know...I defended you above, but this here is stupidity.



Yeah, I can't believe I replied to him. I didn't see this post of his. What a brainwashed idiot. Democrats lie ALL the time, much worse that Trump, MUCH.....but people like this dude is brainwashed. I tell ya what froman, I'll meet you with 10K on the table, you bring yours, and we will do a real IQ test. Then, We will do an education review and combine the two. Don't bring more than you can afford to lose. This is actual stupidity. You see those brainwashed freaks on tv....eyes bugging out....and you calling hard working, educated, conservates low IQ. Yeah.......I wish trump would cut off wellfare to people like you.
Posted by Sofaking2
Member since Apr 2023
21157 posts
Posted on 10/21/24 at 4:54 pm to
quote:

quote: Froman It's not saying he's getting 65% of the vote. He has a 65% chance of winning. Keep up

There is no way he is that dumb? LOL, 65% of the vote, haha
Posted by CleverUserName
Member since Oct 2016
17447 posts
Posted on 10/21/24 at 4:54 pm to
quote:

No, our archaic and outdated election system is designed so only a few states decide an entire election and his lying and manipulation works on those people with low IQs, of which I’m assuming you are included.


You sound like a threat to democracy!
Posted by Sofaking2
Member since Apr 2023
21157 posts
Posted on 10/21/24 at 4:55 pm to
quote:

I thought that would make more sense but it didn’t specifically say that. Can’t imagine any polls have him getting 65% of the popular vote.

No, he really is that dumb, lol
Posted by Fishhead
Elmendorf, TX
Member since Jan 2008
12502 posts
Posted on 10/21/24 at 4:57 pm to
quote:

There is no way he is that dumb
Have you seen it's other posts? Pretty fricking stupid.
Posted by Mandtgr47
Member since Aug 2024
7918 posts
Posted on 10/21/24 at 4:59 pm to
If that was a serious post, he is drawing welfare and repeating MSM talking points.
Posted by AUFANATL
Member since Dec 2007
5339 posts
Posted on 10/21/24 at 5:31 pm to
quote:

No Republican candidate has won the popular vote since 1988 (Bush)


That's not true. Bush won the popular vote by 2.5% in 2004.

He also got a majority (50.8%) of the popular vote that year.

Compare that to:

Carter - 50% in 1976
Reagan - 50% in 1980
Reagan - 59% in 1984
Bush - 53% in 1988
Clinton - 43% in 1992
Clinton - 49% in 1996
Bush/Gore - 48% in 2000
Obama - 53% in 2008
Obama - 51% in 2012
Clinton - 48% in 2016
Biden - *51% in 2020

You see the TRUTH is we have always been "divided" when it comes to Presidential elections and we always will be. The only difference is that people used to bury the hatchet and forget about it by mid-November but now an increasingly broke and irrelevant mainstream media feels compelled to continuously throw gas on the fire.

A candidate typically doesn't get a majority of the total votes and when they do, it's a very small amount that could be rebutted by non-voters in deep red/blue states. The closest anyone has seen to a "mandate" was Reagan with in 1984 (when conditions have never been more favorable for an incumbent party) and possibly Obama in 2009 (when conditions have never been worse for an incumbent party.)

Posted by TCO
Member since Jul 2022
3261 posts
Posted on 10/21/24 at 8:15 pm to
quote:

The system is designed perfectly


The EC is socialism. Plain and simple. A way to win an election without actually winning.

If it was such a great system, states would use it to elect Governors, towns would use it to elect mayors, etc etc.
Posted by Jbird
Shoot the tires out!
Member since Oct 2012
90529 posts
Posted on 10/21/24 at 8:47 pm to
Lol
Posted by Who_Dat_Tiger
Member since Nov 2015
25533 posts
Posted on 10/21/24 at 8:54 pm to
quote:

he’s gotten less and less popular each time.
wasn’t he the only incumbent ever to get more votes in the next election than the first? Might’ve been first ever to get more votes second go round and lose which of course made it even more fishy considering we’re supposed to believe Biden got 81M votes

Either way very stupid take to say he’s less and less popular since Trump will for the third election in a row increase his vote total. He’ll legitimately get 80M+ and possibly win the popular vote which no republican has done in 20 years
quote:

our archaic and outdated election system is designed so only a few states decide an entire election
holy shite why do we even argue with you retards? Hope this is a troll considering the whole point of the EC is so a few states don’t determine our president every election
Posted by PaperTiger
Ruston, LA
Member since Feb 2015
26618 posts
Posted on 10/21/24 at 9:03 pm to

Remember what states fo blue this cycle. Those states are unsavable .
Posted by Clemsontigers02
Member since Sep 2020
1071 posts
Posted on 10/21/24 at 9:06 pm to
Kalshi has Trump around 59 cents. And House of Reps as 50/50.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram