- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Trump Formally Terminating NAFTA
Posted on 12/1/18 at 9:27 pm
Posted on 12/1/18 at 9:27 pm
Posted on 12/1/18 at 9:30 pm to rds dc
I thought the USMCA is the replacement?
Posted on 12/1/18 at 9:42 pm to Hightide12
quote:
Do it Daddy
stop calling him that. it's creepy.
Posted on 12/1/18 at 9:42 pm to 225bred
It still has to be approved by Congress.
He's painted Congress into a corner. They either approve the new deal (which you know the Dems would LOVE to derail such a huge Trump win) or there is no deal at all.
He's painted Congress into a corner. They either approve the new deal (which you know the Dems would LOVE to derail such a huge Trump win) or there is no deal at all.
Posted on 12/1/18 at 9:44 pm to rds dc
Where does he find the time?
Posted on 12/1/18 at 10:01 pm to rds dc
Destroy it and sign no replacement. Free trade needs to go away.
Posted on 12/1/18 at 10:17 pm to Parmen
quote:
Destroy it and sign no replacement. Free trade needs to go away.
if the administration wanted that they'd have bailed on the negotiations when they failed to get the 5 year sunset and the end of arbitration for cross-border disputes
Posted on 12/2/18 at 1:43 am to rds dc
I’m sure we’ll be hearing from some Judge ruling that he can’t do that.
Posted on 12/2/18 at 2:11 am to 90proofprofessional
quote:
Destroy it and sign no replacement. Free trade needs to go away.
if the administration wanted that they'd have bailed on the negotiations when they failed to get the 5 year sunset and the end of arbitration for cross-border disputes
God the 5 year sunset was so dumb.,. Businesses have to have stability... what they ended up with is much better
Posted on 12/2/18 at 2:12 am to 225bred
quote:
I thought the USMCA is the replacement?
Some democrats have started saying maybe it’s not progressive enough so this is a way for Trump to gain leverage... it’s either nothing or usmca. And while some may bitch, every business lobby will be beating down doors to make sure it passes now
Posted on 12/2/18 at 5:46 am to rds dc
quote:Interesting that GHWB and his NWO NAFTA die nearly on the same day.
Posted on 12/2/18 at 5:57 am to Rebel
quote:
Where does he find the time?
We don't hear the bullshite "He doesn't doooooooooooo anything" line anymore do we?
Posted on 12/2/18 at 8:15 am to rds dc
This, on the weekend that 41 passes away. Trump is just awesome with how he sticks it to his opposition when they’re in a weakened position.
I absolutely love it.
I absolutely love it.
Posted on 12/2/18 at 4:04 pm to GeauxBayouBengals
quote:NAFTA doesn't empower the president, acting alone, to withdraw from the treaty.
I’m sure we’ll be hearing from some Judge ruling that he can’t do that.
Posted on 12/2/18 at 4:33 pm to texridder
quote:
NAFTA doesn't empower the president, acting alone, to withdraw from the treaty.
downvoting facts.
You trump fans make me laugh.
Posted on 12/2/18 at 4:38 pm to CelticDog
Celtic I'm not sure you Progs even know what a fact is anymore.
Posted on 12/2/18 at 4:39 pm to CelticDog
quote:
downvoting facts.
Although the 1974 Trade Act grants US presidents the authority to unilaterally withdraw from trade agreements, the fact that NAFTA was implemented through legislation suggests Congress must also sign off on any changes to the agreement, including a withdrawl, according to experts.
It remains unclear, however, whether Congress would definitively have the final say on any attempt from Trump to pull out of the deal, and legal experts have speculated that if Trump does try to withdraw, the case may end up in the courts. LINK
Posted on 12/2/18 at 5:17 pm to Jbird
Was the 1974 Trade ACT legislation, also?
By its name, I would suspect it was.
They're gonna have a hard time saying the President is acting outside the law.
By its name, I would suspect it was.
They're gonna have a hard time saying the President is acting outside the law.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News