- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump election autopsies. You believe this?
Posted on 2/4/21 at 12:25 pm to BeehiveTiger
Posted on 2/4/21 at 12:25 pm to BeehiveTiger
quote:If Trump won in 2020, what do you think the 2024 "election" would look like. Putin has "elections" too.
What a terrible idea. Voting against your own interests, all in the name of hate.
If you don't think that there were a significant number of voters who voted for Biden because of that you would be mistaken.
0
Posted on 2/4/21 at 12:36 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:When the first reported mail-in votes were posted, what did you expect they would look like?
Inexplicable election night occurrences and voting patterns in GA, PA, MI, NV, AZ and WI.
These were "Inexplicable election night occurrences" only for the uninitiated who were trying to explain away a lost election.
Posted on 2/4/21 at 12:39 pm to texridder
quote:
When the first reported mail-in votes were posted, what did you expect they would look like?
In counties where signature matching laws were tossed aside, where no chain of custody was enforced, and where vote harvesting was illegally allowed, I'd expect a Biden win, which is just what happened.
Posted on 2/4/21 at 12:40 pm to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
Yes, trump did a great job of rallying his base. Unfortunately for him, the more he rallied his base the more he rallied those to vote against him.
Makes no sense...
Trump increased his base with Hispanics and blacks...
Posted on 2/4/21 at 12:46 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Have you ever noticed that it is uniformly YOUR side of these discussions which resorts to this sort of language?
You’re calling out someone for questioning another person’s intelligence?
Posted on 2/4/21 at 12:53 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
It is difficult to have a reasonable discussion with someone, when you acknowledge that you disagree with him and explain your reasoning, yet his only response is to assert (without evidence) that you are “lying” about your reasoning,
There is NOTHING in his post history that supports your stance. Zip. You are speaking in general. I am referring to one poster. It is what it is. No offense, but his claims mean nothing in light of his repetitive posting that is nothing short of “far left.”
Posted on 2/4/21 at 12:58 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
ave you ever noticed that it is uniformly YOUR side of these discussions which resorts to this sort of language?
No. It isn’t.
Posted on 2/4/21 at 1:19 pm to ohnoletsgeaux
the number of statistical anomalies, discredit any polling. we all know that ballot harvesting in those 5 counties stole the election... when you have 91% turnout when the avg is 52% you basically had people running around paying people in gucci bags to hand over their illegal mail in ballot, signed off on it and marked biden. they did this to every homeless person and idiot in those 5 cities. and then took them to the drop boxes. if you ran the election tomorrow (even with everything thats happened since) if it was ran LEGALLY, trump would win in a landslide. they conjured up the perfect plan, i give credit. it was brilliant.. literally the only way to prove it was a fraud was to audit every vote. who in the hell is going to order that?.. like i said, brilliant plan... but since they went far, the gloves should be off. dont hold back for one second, kick them while they are down, step on the throat, i dont care. every SOB in washington on the other side of them needs to have a killer instinct..
Posted on 2/4/21 at 1:24 pm to TigerFan55555
Yep.
The idiots on this thread arguing that Biden won the popular vote, therefore the results are valid are dishonest douches.
The idiots on this thread arguing that Biden won the popular vote, therefore the results are valid are dishonest douches.
Posted on 2/4/21 at 4:59 pm to texridder
quote:it's funny you think this actually explains anything about the result of the election
Trump significantly underperformed in the suburbs which traditionally have gone strong Republican in those bellwether counties.
Easy answer. Unless you're blindfolded
Posted on 2/4/21 at 5:01 pm to texridder
quote:that's only true if you believe that biden actually magically got a bunch of mail ins that were highly spurious and any investigation into them is being squelched by election officials
Trump significantly underperformed in the suburbs
Posted on 2/4/21 at 5:02 pm to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
Trump won 19 of 20 bellwether counties. And Trump won 2496 counties to Biden’s 477
If only that meant anything at all.
It meant quite a bit until the 2020 GE.. lol!
Posted on 2/4/21 at 5:03 pm to AggieHank86
quote:HANK'S BACK
All of them were VERY excited to be voting against Donald freakin’ Trump
now just prove that biden actually got those votes you're referring to. otherwise, you're just parroting what you were told by corrupt politicians who are now trying to bury the whole episode
Posted on 2/4/21 at 5:18 pm to AggieHank86
quote:yeah he pretty much is
The Trump base is utterly convinced (in a positive way) that he is a once-in-a-lifetime sort of candidate
1. independently wealthy - no obligations
2. mostly interested in good business deals, not political compromises
3. willing to fight the establishment for that
good luck finding another one of those
quote:i might believe you if i hadn't seen so many photos and videos of election cheating to count completely suspicious mail in ballots that the establishment fought to get instituted. sorry, can't suspend disbelief on that one
he elicits the same degree of NEGATIVE fervor in the other side
Posted on 2/4/21 at 5:20 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Obama’s favorability ratings were far higher than Trump.
he thinks this means something quote:no, the "difference" is biden got a totally unbelievable amount of fake votes that has been proven over and over which leads gullible rubes to run to the "suburban women" theory
he Center sort of liked Obama, and the Center disliked Trump rather intensely. Therein lies the difference
Posted on 2/4/21 at 5:23 pm to AggieHank86
quote:bro, he got more in person votes than any candidate ever. it's both
You are mistaking the DEPTH of his support for BREADTH.
quote:70mil people showed up in person during a virus outbreak. you are factually, hilariously wrong on this point, like several others
But that is simply not as MANY people as you think it is
quote:he said while parroting ideas that come from a dem echo chamber that don't match up with reality
You are living in a bubble
quote:would you stop with this bullcrap. it doesn't mean anything. well, to normal people at least
His favorability rating
Posted on 2/4/21 at 5:24 pm to Mickey Goldmill
quote:you need new friends. people who look at facts before feelings
I have a group of friends that never vote at all and aren't very political in the least. They all voted for Biden and it was motivated by wanting to vote against Trump
Posted on 2/4/21 at 5:26 pm to AggieHank86
quote:again, this silly, fraudulent idea is based on the objectively proven wrong notion that biden actually got votes. even if someone could actually prove that biden got any votes, you still couldn't quantify that distinction
(1) the people who VOTED for Trump/GOP in the POTUS election (2) his hard-core base
this is like trying to explain homosexuality to you
Posted on 2/4/21 at 5:35 pm to Bass Tiger
quote:
It meant quite a bit until the 2020 GE.. lol!
You mean other that the 3 previous times since 1980 where the bellweather counties were also wrong in predicting the presidential winner.
Posted on 2/4/21 at 5:36 pm to texridder
quote:1. legal
When the first reported mail-in votes were posted, what did you expect they would look like?
2. reported during counting hours when election observers weren't being shuffled around or told to go home
3. chain of custody readily available
4. not seeing photos of ballots being pulled out of shipping envelopes from a chinese shipping company which was later corroborated by a video released by chinese dissidents
5. correct bar codes and watermarks and other identifiers
6. submitted by people who weren't using an outreach center for their home address
7. submitted by people who weren't dead
8. submitted by people who only voted once
9. submitted by people who were legal citizens of legal voting age
10. ballots that weren't returned on the same day as they were mailed
11. readily auditable in a transparent fashion by election officials who are all too happy to make sure the public knows the votes were legit
that question didn't work out like you thought it would did it? quote:only morons would believe that these votes were totally legit and valid after seeing all the evidence and hearing the eyewitness/expert testimony
These were "Inexplicable election night occurrences" only for the uninitiated who were trying to explain away a lost election
This post was edited on 2/4/21 at 5:39 pm
Page 7 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News