Started By
Message

re: Trump didn’t actually name any names connected to seditious behavior

Posted on 11/20/25 at 1:58 pm to
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
74669 posts
Posted on 11/20/25 at 1:58 pm to
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
464593 posts
Posted on 11/20/25 at 2:00 pm to
quote:

Trump played the game right back.

Responding with emotion and without being legally correct.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
464593 posts
Posted on 11/20/25 at 2:01 pm to
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
92701 posts
Posted on 11/20/25 at 2:02 pm to
Siding with Ds as always
Posted by loogaroo
Welsh
Member since Dec 2005
39211 posts
Posted on 11/20/25 at 2:05 pm to
quote:

Responding with emotion and without being legally correct.


Good lord man. It went right over your head.

There's nothing legal here to discuss. It's pure political mud slinging.
This post was edited on 11/20/25 at 2:13 pm
Posted by antibarner
Member since Oct 2009
25939 posts
Posted on 11/20/25 at 2:09 pm to
Ok Captain Doubletalk....you've told us what the Democrats are NOT doing. Just what is it they ARE doing? We await your reply.

How can they instruct anyone to do something when we don't know what it is? Just what illegal order has been issued? Or will be issued? When they say it, theyre guilty of seditious conspiracy if it turns out to be legal,
This post was edited on 11/20/25 at 2:12 pm
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
135157 posts
Posted on 11/20/25 at 2:10 pm to
quote:

It was intentionally meant to mean the textbook definition of "literally"
"Saying" in the context of the post means conveying or messaging.

The message being conveyed is that orders being issued in the chain of command are unlawful. That is literally the message, and it is the sole reason for the cited video.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
464593 posts
Posted on 11/20/25 at 2:12 pm to
quote:

The message being conveyed is that orders being issued in the chain of command are unlawful.


The actual words used

quote:

Our laws are clear. You can refuse illegal orders. You *must* refuse illegal orders.


quote:

That is literally the message

No the actual words make it clear that they're telling soldiers to follow the law and Constitution, and only illegal orders are the issue.

You're interpreting the rest, which is why you can't use literally.

Since I'm relying on their actual words, I can use literally.
Posted by antibarner
Member since Oct 2009
25939 posts
Posted on 11/20/25 at 2:16 pm to
The second they specify what orders are illegal they are toast. We have your backs they said. They'll be sitting next to whoever defies the President in Leavenworth.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
464593 posts
Posted on 11/20/25 at 2:16 pm to
quote:

Just what is it they ARE doing?


Baiting Trump and his admin to respond emotionally and like idiots. Bonus points if those arguments involved illegal actions.



quote:

How can they instruct anyone to do something when we don't know what it is?

It's a general statement that doesn't require those sorts of details. Their instruction is to follow ALL the laws and the Constitution.

Sedition isn't possible with lawful behavior.

Treason isn't possible with lawful behavior.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
464593 posts
Posted on 11/20/25 at 2:16 pm to
quote:

The second they specify what orders are illegal they are toast.

They don't have to.

And it's driving the NPCs absolutely mad.

Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
41726 posts
Posted on 11/20/25 at 2:17 pm to
He’s making people tell on themselves.

Posted by Timeoday
Easter Island
Member since Aug 2020
17116 posts
Posted on 11/20/25 at 2:17 pm to
What those politicians did was far more devastating to the lives of Americans than the attack on Pearl Harbor or 9/11.

I mean, if I were a Democrat isn't that what I am supposed to say?
Posted by antibarner
Member since Oct 2009
25939 posts
Posted on 11/20/25 at 2:18 pm to
If I am Trump I make a video asking them to specify what orders are illegal. The ball is in your court Democrats. If things are so bad you should tell us all what illegal orders have been issued and stop trying to use US Service members as political pawns.Shameless.

Put up or shut up.
This post was edited on 11/20/25 at 2:21 pm
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
464593 posts
Posted on 11/20/25 at 2:20 pm to
quote:

What those politicians did was far more devastating to the lives of Americans than the attack on Pearl Harbor or 9/11.

Your troll schtick was pushed too far with this post, friend.
Posted by antibarner
Member since Oct 2009
25939 posts
Posted on 11/20/25 at 2:21 pm to
I guarantee if someone refuses an order those Dems will be nowhere to be found because they could be implicated.
Posted by antibarner
Member since Oct 2009
25939 posts
Posted on 11/20/25 at 2:23 pm to
Trump did nothing different then the Democrats did,. He merely stated what the law was.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
464593 posts
Posted on 11/20/25 at 2:24 pm to
quote:

I guarantee if someone refuses an order those Dems will be nowhere to be found because they could be implicated.

I imagine you're right.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
464593 posts
Posted on 11/20/25 at 2:24 pm to
quote:

Trump did nothing different then the Democrats did,. He merely stated what the law was.

And nobody has accused Trump of committing a crime for his online posts in the matter.

This dog won't hunt, either. Vacherie already tried this silliness, I believe.
This post was edited on 11/20/25 at 2:25 pm
Posted by TigerAxeOK
Where I lay my head is home.
Member since Dec 2016
35163 posts
Posted on 11/20/25 at 2:34 pm to
quote:

And nobody can point to what law was broken (with some irony in there, I must add)

Is this the same thing you said when Trump was convicted* of 34 bogus charges in which proving a crime was prerequisite and yet no crime was proven?
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram