- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump declass'd everything why does the DOJ and media keep saying the docs are classified?
Posted on 6/9/23 at 3:28 pm to boosiebadazz
Posted on 6/9/23 at 3:28 pm to boosiebadazz
So we trust Jack Smith?
0
Posted on 6/9/23 at 3:28 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I'm not even sure that the declassification status is the most important thing for these charges because it's based around documents relating to national security.
The charges are based on national security, USC 793. But the basis of the charges involve classified documents. At least that is my understanding.
Then there are the obstruction of justice charges too.
Posted on 6/9/23 at 3:28 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
No, just telling you the legal standard. It wouldn’t surprise me, however, if Trump is quieter when the issue revolves around criminal allegations.
Wait….you think this is Trumps first criminal allegation?
Posted on 6/9/23 at 3:28 pm to TigerDoc
You have him?
This time?
This time?
Posted on 6/9/23 at 3:29 pm to pankReb
quote:
Wait….you think this is Trumps first criminal allegation?
Second indictment.
Posted on 6/9/23 at 3:31 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Second indictment.
But that isn’t what you said.
And even so….he didn’t hold back speaking publicly about his first indictment.
Posted on 6/9/23 at 3:31 pm to roadGator
If anybody gets him, it's because he's let himself be gotten. Not strong opsec here.
Posted on 6/9/23 at 3:32 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
Did you read the indictment?
Only parts. I'll have to read the entire document later. I stopped right before the obstruction part.
I admit, the parts I read (red), read (reed) pretty damning. But it is the prosecution's side of the story.
This post was edited on 6/9/23 at 3:33 pm
Posted on 6/9/23 at 3:33 pm to TigerDoc
The dialogue with the staffer on Battle plans trying to show Trump means rea is very weak sauce by Jack-arse.
Trump is no expert on PRA is one easy way around this. Simply claim he didn’t realize by having the docs in his possession it means they are unclassified
Or
He can simply say he was trying to impress this staffer and say in reality in his mind and by having it in his possession and that he knew it was unclassified.
I mean trump has never exaggerated and tried to impress anyone before …lol
In fact my 2nd example is exactly what trump defense will be most likely.
Just bullsh!tting some young staffer
Good luck with Bidens goon DAs in reading trumps mind.
Trump is no expert on PRA is one easy way around this. Simply claim he didn’t realize by having the docs in his possession it means they are unclassified
Or
He can simply say he was trying to impress this staffer and say in reality in his mind and by having it in his possession and that he knew it was unclassified.
I mean trump has never exaggerated and tried to impress anyone before …lol
In fact my 2nd example is exactly what trump defense will be most likely.
Just bullsh!tting some young staffer
Good luck with Bidens goon DAs in reading trumps mind.
This post was edited on 6/9/23 at 3:37 pm
Posted on 6/9/23 at 3:35 pm to pankReb
quote:
But that isn’t what you said.
Ok.
quote:
And even so….he didn’t hold back speaking publicly about his first indictment.
Ok.
Posted on 6/9/23 at 3:35 pm to Bunk Moreland
But Tom Fitton doesn't have a JD.
Posted on 6/9/23 at 3:35 pm to GumboPot
quote:
But the basis of the charges involve classified documents
It's likely going to end up being national security docs, like the alleged war plan that is still missing. Not strictly classified docs.
The media is running with "classified" cause they don't know what else to say and it's already a phrase in the ether.
Posted on 6/9/23 at 3:36 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
And even so….he didn’t hold back speaking publicly about his first indictment. Ok.
So it still doesn’t raise a question to you that THIS is the time he’s chosen to remain silent?
Posted on 6/9/23 at 3:36 pm to GumboPot
Gumbo, start reading The Defendants Concealment of Boxes starting on page 21. They'll have to show their evidence during the trial. You simply cannot bring these types of charges on a whim to get someone. But we do live in Clown World so maybe there is hope for MAGA. I just have my doubts right now.
Posted on 6/9/23 at 3:37 pm to masoncj
quote:
He can simply say he was trying to impress this staffer and say in reality in his mind and by having it in his possession and that he knew it was unclassified.
I mean trump has never exaggerated and tried to impress anyone before …lol
In fact my 2nd example is exactly what trump defense will be most likely.
Just bullsh!tting some young staffer
This may actually work.
Posted on 6/9/23 at 3:37 pm to highanklesprain20
quote:
The media is running with "classified" cause they don't know what else to say and it's already a phrase in the ether.
It sounds like they’re running with Trumps very own words about the docs still being classified.
Posted on 6/9/23 at 3:37 pm to pankReb
Lol you Ronbots celebrating this bs is so pathetic. Glad you’re all outing yourselves tho
Posted on 6/9/23 at 3:38 pm to masoncj
I think you're right that the puffery defense is the way to go and there's lots of plausibility from his background that could be compelling to jurors.
Posted on 6/9/23 at 3:39 pm to jbdawgs03
quote:
Lol you Ronbots celebrating this bs is so pathetic. Glad you’re all outing yourselves tho
I, too, enjoy making up incredibly unfounded bullshite narratives to make myself feel better.
This is why we call you cultists. “Everyone is out to get me”
Posted on 6/9/23 at 3:40 pm to TigerDoc
quote:
I think you're right that the puffery defense is the way to go and there's lots of plausibility from his background that could be compelling to jurors.
But at the same time, I don’t think “jury, my client is an idiot” is a smart strategy long-term.
Page 7 of 15
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News