Started By
Message

Trump Barred From Making Closing Arguments.

Posted on 1/10/24 at 1:56 pm
Posted by ItzMe1972
Member since Dec 2013
9786 posts
Posted on 1/10/24 at 1:56 pm
An attorney for Trump informed Judge Arthur Engoron earlier this week that the ex-president wished to speak during the closing arguments and Engoron initially approved the plan, The Associated Press reported.

Now Engoron has rescinded the move, even though Trump is still expected to appear.

LINK





This post was edited on 1/10/24 at 2:23 pm
Posted by crap4brain
Louisiana
Member since Sep 2004
2495 posts
Posted on 1/10/24 at 2:06 pm to
Since when are you not allowed to speak on your own behalf?
Posted by SloaneRanger
Upper Hurstville
Member since Jan 2014
7665 posts
Posted on 1/10/24 at 2:15 pm to
Best thing that could have happened to Trump.

Not an unusual ruling either, especially if the defendants are separate business entities. They have to be represented by counsel.
Posted by teamjackson
Headspace, LLC
Member since Nov 2012
4606 posts
Posted on 1/10/24 at 2:16 pm to
Insert shoutingatsky.gif

ETA:

This post was edited on 1/10/24 at 2:18 pm
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422118 posts
Posted on 1/10/24 at 2:24 pm to
quote:

Since when are you not allowed to speak on your own behalf?

I'm sure he can testify if he so desires.
Posted by Butterfinger1
Member since Apr 2015
54 posts
Posted on 1/10/24 at 2:26 pm to
That's not entirely true. Trump was given guidelines on the process and he refused three different times to sign off on it.
Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
19422 posts
Posted on 1/10/24 at 2:31 pm to
These corrupt commie persecutors need to be held accountable.

18 U.S.C. § 241

Conspiracy Against Rights

Section 241 makes it unlawful for two or more persons to agree to injure, threaten, or intimidate a person in the United States in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured by the Constitution or laws of the United States or because of his or her having exercised such a right.

Unlike most conspiracy statutes, §241 does not require, as an element, the commission of an overt act.

The offense is always a felony, even if the underlying conduct would not, on its own, establish a felony violation of another criminal civil rights statute. It is punishable by up to ten years imprisonment unless the government proves an aggravating factor (such as that the offense involved kidnapping aggravated sexual abuse, or resulted in death) in which case it may be punished by up to life imprisonment and, if death results, may be eligible for the death penalty.

Section 241 is used in Law Enforcement Misconduct and Hate Crime Prosecutions. It was historically used, before conspiracy-specific trafficking statutes were adopted, in Human Trafficking prosecutions.



MISCONDUCT BY LAW ENFORCEMENT & OTHER GOVERNMENT ACTORS


18 U.S.C. § 242

Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law

This provision makes it a crime for someone acting under color of law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. It is not necessary that the offense be motivated by racial bias or by any other animus.

Defendants act under color of law when they wield power vested by a government entity. Those prosecuted under the statute typically include police officers, sheriff’s deputies, and prison guards. However other government actors, such as judges, district attorneys, other public officials, and public school employees can also act under color of law and can be prosecuted under this statute.

Section 242 does not criminalize any particular type of abusive conduct. Instead, it incorporates by reference rights defined by the Constitution, federal statutes, and interpretive case law. Cases charged by federal prosecutors most often involve physical or sexual assaults. The Department has also prosecuted public officials for thefts, false arrests, evidence-planting, and failing to protect someone in custody from constitutional violations committed by others.

A violation of the statute is a misdemeanor, unless prosecutors prove one of the statutory aggravating factors such as a bodily injury, use of a dangerous weapon, kidnapping, aggravated sexual abuse, death resulting, or attempt to kill, in which case there are graduated penalties up to and including life in prison or death. If charged in conjunction with 18 U.S.C. § 250, as noted below, all sexual assaults under color of law are felonies.
Posted by lake chuck fan
westlake
Member since Aug 2011
9137 posts
Posted on 1/10/24 at 2:33 pm to
The left make a mockery of this country and everything that made us great. Thing about it is, they don't have a bit of concern of how they come across to the tens of millions who support Trump.
Posted by m2pro
Member since Nov 2008
28601 posts
Posted on 1/10/24 at 2:35 pm to
quote:

teamjackson


Do you agree or disagree that this judge has been unethical towards Trump?
Posted by RockyMtnTigerWDE
War Damn Eagle Dad!
Member since Oct 2010
105400 posts
Posted on 1/10/24 at 2:47 pm to
quote:

Do you agree or disagree that this judge has been unethical towards Trump?


give him a moment he is searching for another meme or gif to post to your question.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
26119 posts
Posted on 1/10/24 at 2:49 pm to
quote:

Engoron agreed to the move but set boundaries, saying he was inclined to 'let everyone have his or her say.' The judge then said that Trump would have to stick to what attorneys say in closing arguments, which includes 'commentary on the relevant, material facts that are in evidence, and application of the relevant law to those facts.' The former president would not be allowed to 'comment on irrelevant matters' or 'deliver a campaign speech.' He also wouldn't be allowed to criticize the judge, his staff, Attorney General James, her lawyers or the court system, Engoron wrote, according to the AP. Trump's attorney Christopher Kise told Engoron that those limitations were unfair and the ex-president could not agree to them.
Posted by POTUS2024
Member since Nov 2022
10973 posts
Posted on 1/10/24 at 3:00 pm to
I think the appeal is pretty much locked up now. Should also be able to get a judgment for all legal costs. This is a clown show.
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
80193 posts
Posted on 1/10/24 at 3:10 pm to
quote:

judge then said that Trump would have to stick to what attorneys say in closing arguments, which includes 'commentary on the relevant, material facts that are in evidence, and application of the relevant law to those facts.' The former president would not be allowed to 'comment on irrelevant matters' or 'deliver a campaign speech.' He also wouldn't be allowed to criticize the judge, his staff, Attorney General James, her lawyers or the court system, Engoron wrote, according to the AP. Trump's attorney Christopher Kise told Engoron that those limitations were unfair and the ex-president could not agree to them.


Seems reasonable. Why does the Cult have a problem with this?
Posted by TDTOM
Member since Jan 2021
14360 posts
Posted on 1/10/24 at 3:14 pm to
So he could talk, he just couldn't talk about certain things that would help his case. Got it.
Posted by lake chuck fan
westlake
Member since Aug 2011
9137 posts
Posted on 1/10/24 at 3:15 pm to
quote:

Seems reasonable. Why does the Cult have a problem with this?


Yeah.
Your right, the entire banana republic shite show against Trump has been reasonable.

That entire court system needs to be ridiculed. Karma is a bitch.
Posted by Lynxrufus2012
Central Kentucky
Member since Mar 2020
12101 posts
Posted on 1/10/24 at 3:15 pm to
So much for our constitution.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
115597 posts
Posted on 1/10/24 at 3:16 pm to
quote:

Engoron agreed to the move but set boundaries, saying he was inclined to 'let everyone have his or her say.' The judge then said that Trump would have to stick to what attorneys say in closing arguments, which includes 'commentary on the relevant, material facts that are in evidence, and application of the relevant law to those facts.' The former president would not be allowed to 'comment on irrelevant matters' or 'deliver a campaign speech.' He also wouldn't be allowed to criticize the judge, his staff, Attorney General James, her lawyers or the court system, Engoron wrote, according to the AP. Trump's attorney Christopher Kise told Engoron that those limitations were unfair and the ex-president could not agree to them.


This is literally what any Judge would or should do.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
115597 posts
Posted on 1/10/24 at 3:16 pm to
quote:

So much for our constitution.



Posted by Boone23
Highpoint NC
Member since Oct 2023
38 posts
Posted on 1/10/24 at 3:18 pm to
Kangaroo court! He should jump when he appears.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
115597 posts
Posted on 1/10/24 at 3:18 pm to
quote:

So he could talk, he just couldn't talk about certain things that would help his case. Got it.



The judge limited him to what anyone else would be limited to in Closing Argument.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram