- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Trump & Kissenger working together or not working together? Politico vs. Daily Beast
Posted on 7/26/18 at 3:26 pm
Posted on 7/26/18 at 3:26 pm
Politico article today:
Politico Article
"An overreliance on traditional back-door channels is compounding the situation. According to the former U.S. policy adviser, Beijing relies too much on the Wall Street and political elite, including Henry Paulson and Henry Kissinger, to understand US politics — people who do not have any influence over Trump.
“Trump doesn’t listen to them or talk to them. I think the Chinese leadership underestimated the situation,” the former adviser said."
The Daily Beast
"Henry Kissinger suggested to President Donald Trump that the United States should work with Russia to contain a rising China.
The mere fact that Kissinger was given an audience to make his pitch—he’s met with Trump at least three times since the 2016 campaign—is a testament to his tremendous staying power in top political circles, despite a controversial foreign policy track record that includes numerous accusations of war crimes."
Who should I believe the South China Morning Post/Politico or The Daily Beast
Politico Article
"An overreliance on traditional back-door channels is compounding the situation. According to the former U.S. policy adviser, Beijing relies too much on the Wall Street and political elite, including Henry Paulson and Henry Kissinger, to understand US politics — people who do not have any influence over Trump.
“Trump doesn’t listen to them or talk to them. I think the Chinese leadership underestimated the situation,” the former adviser said."
The Daily Beast
"Henry Kissinger suggested to President Donald Trump that the United States should work with Russia to contain a rising China.
The mere fact that Kissinger was given an audience to make his pitch—he’s met with Trump at least three times since the 2016 campaign—is a testament to his tremendous staying power in top political circles, despite a controversial foreign policy track record that includes numerous accusations of war crimes."
Who should I believe the South China Morning Post/Politico or The Daily Beast
3
Posted on 7/26/18 at 3:43 pm to MrLSU
Henry Kissinger should be prosecuted for war crimes. I hope Trump isn’t working with a guy Hillary Clinton once called a friend and said “I was very flattered when Henry Kissinger said I ran the State Department better than anybody had run it in a long time.”
Posted on 7/26/18 at 3:43 pm to MrLSU
quote:
Who should I believe the South China Morning Post/Politico or The Daily Beast
Reminds me of Pompeo's testimony yesterday when he responded to a few questions with: "So you'd rather believe RT than your own President" and "let me ask you Senator, who's more reliable, POTUS or the Russian Military".
Believe the foreign opposition media, the domestic opposition media, or listen to what the duly elected POTUS and staff have to say on matters? Let's see now...which ones have the most to gain by lying to the American public and other, foreign, interests?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News