re: Trump administration contends it has no duty to return illegally deported man to US

When you read something, you don't just get to pluck out the parts that you think bolster your argument. Read the entire document. Or, if you are too lazy to go find it in its entirety, it's posted for you just above.

He got processed under a different title iirc. Again he’s never been a citizen and has no right to be here. His country is not going to and can’t release him anyways. Do more research instead of whining about stupid shite on here for an illegal.

quote:

---

Read the next clause in that sentence and then read the next sentence.

---

I’m familiar with the admin’s arguments. Doesn’t change that they admitted that the removal was in error.

Just read the next sentence yourself. If you don't understand the plain language and the plain statements that were made yesterday, come back and I'll see what I can do to explain it to you.

quote:

---

And then in the very next sentence state that said admission is moot. Again . . . that's exactly what Miller said. It was a dumb thing for the Solicitor to say.

---

It does seem a dumb thing to say. The Administration seems to be on firm footing with the AEA. And in this particular case Garcia was already adjudicated to be a member of the gang subject to deportation in Trump's AEA Proclamation.

That is a strong, and I think, air-tight argument.

This "administrative mistake" crap needs to be put away.

quote:

---

And in this particular case Garcia was already adjudicated to be a member of the gang subject to deportation in Trump's AEA Proclamation.

---

Almost all of us agree that Abrego-Garcia should have been deported, and that US courts don’t have the power to compel El Salvador to return him to the United States. So, this is mostly an academic argument.

I don't understand why the Trump immigration people didn't deport him in 2019. After all, NONE of the evidence of his gang affiliation is from after 2019.

They could have either appealed the hold that prohibited his deportation to El Salvador OR could have arranged deportation to some country other than El Salvador.

I think we have just about beat this horse to death, but I don't understand how the BASIS for Abrego-Garcia's deportation removes the 2019 order that barred his deportation to El Salvador.

Again, the ICE Field Director's affidavit---filed after Trump’s invocation of AEA---shows that the hold order was still operative.

I listened to Bondi and Miller and don't see how the order to not deport Abrego-Garcia to El Salvador was somehow rendered moot. What am I missing? ICE's sworn position as of two weeks ago is that the 2019 order legally prohibited deportation to El Salvador: "This grant of protection PROHIBITED his removal to El Salvador."

Again, not that important in the grand scheme of things.

Thanks for any assistance.

quote:

---

I listened to Bondi and Miller and don't see how the order to not deport Abrego-Garcia to El Salvador was somehow rendered moot. What am I missing? ICE's sworn position as of two weeks ago is that the 2019 order legally prohibited deportation to El Salvador: "This grant of protection PROHIBITED his removal to El Salvador."

---

That is what I was thinking as well, but jawnybnsc pointed out that in the SG's filing the government is using Trump's AEA Proclamation where he named MS-13 members as alien enemies/terrorists makes the Order prohibiting deportation to El Salvador moot.

That is a strong argument, but it makes the continued statement "deportation was an administrative mistake" seem bizarre.

quote:

---

return of a Maryland man

---

quote:

---

return of an El Salvadoran man living illegally in Maryland.

---

Fixed

quote:

---

Looking like the admin affiants will have to sit for depos over the next week.

---

What questions would you want asked?

It was rendered moot when El Salvador eradicated the gang that was supposedly threatening them for "pupusa" protection money.

El Salvador stated that they have been wiped out several years back and as such, the restriction no longer exists to prevent his removal.

And that restriction was put in place prior to MS13 being designated a terrorist organization, and as such the terror designation would supersede the asylum request.

He went from being a "normal" asylum seeker to in essence, a "terrorist" with the designation. At that point he is no longer viable as someone requesting asylum and there are no hardship limitations to his expulsion/deportation.

The "paperwork" error is that he was not deported sooner, and his status was not updated before being put on the plane, not that he shouldn't have ever been removed.