- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Town Hall warns about Texas
Posted on 8/31/26 at 11:04 am
Posted on 8/31/26 at 11:04 am
Leftist rag Town Hall's Derek Hunter warned about the Texas Senate Race.
Town Hall
quote:
Republicans look at the polling in Texas and dismiss it pretty quickly. The idea that someone like James TalaWeirdo could win the “deep red Texas” seems insane, I admit. But it wasn’t that long ago that “deep red Texas” was deep blue. The one certainty in politics is that things change, and Republicans need to accept that and fight accordingly, or they will lose.
I’ve never thought Ken Paxton was a particularly good candidate. He’s got scandals associated with him that led to Republicans in Texas impeaching him, even though he was not convicted. He’s also got more personal baggage than LaGuardia the day before Christmas. Yes, he has won statewide before, but it’s 2026, and he’s running for the United States Senate, which is different from his previous role of Attorney General. Senate candidates get much closer looks than AGs do. Being angry about that reality is about as effective as being mad at the sunrise – it’s not going to change anything, no matter how angry you get.
Texas is getting tighter, which doesn’t help Paxton. Sen. Ted Cruz (T-TX) barely beat Beto last time, and Beto was a moron. And Paxton isn’t a particularly good or compelling candidate; he’s not raising money like he needs to.
The idea that what always was will always be is, honestly, dumb. The media figures who are pretending things are going great for Republicans in “red states” simply because they’re red are lying to you in order to get your eyes and clicks. You can make a lot of money telling people what they want to hear, because you can make a lot of money by appealing to a small percentage of the population. What’s much harder with that business model is making a difference. And elections are about making a difference.
You wouldn’t know it, but California used to be a Republican state. Governors and Senators were more likely to be Republicans than Democrats. Things changed over time. From 1875 to 1969, Florida didn’t have a Republican Senator. The governor wasn’t any different. Now look at it. ...
Things change. Parties not only have to fight to win in new places, but they have to fight to maintain the old ones too. Taking anything for granted is the fastest way to the minority.
The idea that Republicans can’t lose in Texas is as foolish as the idea that Democrats can’t lose in Michigan simply because they haven’t in a while.
Ken Paxton’s pitch for campaign contributions is, to put it simply, bad. An email Sunday read, “Ken Paxton: Democrats are flooding Texas with campaign cash... James Talarico raised $27 Million! If we allow Democrats to outraise us in Texas- we could end up stuck with a far-left Senator who thinks 'God is non-binary,' and we could lose control of the United States Senate (which could doom President Trump's agenda)! We cannot let that happen. Rush support here.”
That’s it, that’s the entirety of the pitch. I know I regularly make fun of campaign fundraising emails, but this one is singularly awful, as it tells the reader nothing about why they should donate or what the issues are; it’s just “give to me because I’m a Republican.”
Would you buy a car from someone who walks up to you on the lot and says, “Hey, buy a car”? No, you wouldn’t.
Earlier the very same day, Paxton’s team sent out an email that read, in part, “Our campaign just recorded the largest fundraising quarter for any non-incumbent GOP candidate this cycle, with a total of over $9 MILLION raised!... But unfortunately, as impressive as our total was, we were still OUTRAISED MORE THAN 3:1 by my radical Democrat opponent and the Democrat political machine backing him!”
Have you ever read anything less inspiring? “We raised a good amount of money, but were blown out of the water by our opponent and need even more from you now” is not exactly
Hoosiers, is it?
Just because something is does not mean it always will be, and neither just something that should be. You have to work; Ken Paxton has to work – not only hard, but smart. A heck of a lot harder and smarter than he has so far if he’s going to save us from Senator Bowl Cut McToo Enthusiastic About Trans Kids.
Town Hall
Posted on 8/31/26 at 11:50 am to prplhze2000
Major error in that article. Cruz walloped Allred the last time he was up for re-election.
Paxton is starting to make the rounds on podcasts and he’s right when he says the media is trying to force a blackout on him which started during the runoff. On Spectrum News, during a segment on the race, they purposely put up a nice, professional picture of Talarico and the worst picture of Paxton they could possibly find. The media is going to try to do everything they can to keep Paxton from winning. Sadly, this includes conservative media.
Paxton is starting to make the rounds on podcasts and he’s right when he says the media is trying to force a blackout on him which started during the runoff. On Spectrum News, during a segment on the race, they purposely put up a nice, professional picture of Talarico and the worst picture of Paxton they could possibly find. The media is going to try to do everything they can to keep Paxton from winning. Sadly, this includes conservative media.
Posted on 8/31/26 at 12:21 pm to prplhze2000
quote:
The idea that someone like James TalaWeirdo could win the “deep red Texas” seems insane, I admit. But it wasn’t that long ago that “deep red Texas” was deep blue.
I laughed at this line pretty good! Yes, back in the 70’s and some of the 80’s, Texas had some Democrats.
But the Democrats back then, were still Constitutionalists and normal folks.
So now, Texas may go Democrat because we were Democrat 40 years ago… even though democrats today are more socialist and Marxist than they are human.
Retarded analysis is retarded.
Posted on 8/31/26 at 4:06 pm to Django Unchained
Bentson was Senator til the 90's. Richards was Governor til 94.
Posted on 8/31/26 at 4:30 pm to prplhze2000
quote:
Richards was Governor til 94.
She won in 1990 by 1.5% vs. Clayton Williams, a smart businessman from out in way West Texas, but not someone who was very publicly aware situationally.
She outspent GW Bush by a good margin in 1994 for re-election and was beat pretty soundly. About 7.5%.
Posted on 8/31/26 at 4:37 pm to prplhze2000
Did they just copy from the Redstate that you had yesterday? I once had those rags but got tired of their portal and having to prove I had membership every other day.
Posted on 8/31/26 at 5:01 pm to ragincajun03
Yup. Limbaugh had a funny parody of Ann Richards losing. Bill Clinton called her and she started cussing him out.
Posted on 8/31/26 at 5:06 pm to prplhze2000
What the writer is saying is that we need a compromising candidate that will go along to get along.
And that is a bullshite thought. Its why we are where we are now.
And that is a bullshite thought. Its why we are where we are now.
Posted on 8/31/26 at 5:07 pm to ragincajun03
Yours truly makes an appearance
Posted on 8/31/26 at 5:10 pm to prplhze2000
TLDNR
Paxton is solid, kept Fauci out of Texas, hard on immigrants, keeps our guns, wants low tax…..
Talafreako draped a gay flag and trans flag over a Cross and recited a Mooslem prayer at a Christian church…
Paxton is solid, kept Fauci out of Texas, hard on immigrants, keeps our guns, wants low tax…..
Talafreako draped a gay flag and trans flag over a Cross and recited a Mooslem prayer at a Christian church…
Posted on 8/31/26 at 7:44 pm to OWLFAN86
quote:
Yours truly makes an appearance
We have a MFing celebrity in our midst.
Posted on 8/31/26 at 7:44 pm to prplhze2000
SSDE
Same shite, different election
Same shite, different election
Posted on 8/31/26 at 8:05 pm to prplhze2000
Paxton will either win or lose. I'm voting for him. If he loses, he was not the best candidate. Keep that under consideration as you choose your future candidates.
Popular
Back to top
7








