- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Touchdown Timmy is trending on twitter - Wild rumors about Tim Walz -drops at 4pm
Posted on 10/12/24 at 12:23 pm to Roaad
Posted on 10/12/24 at 12:23 pm to Roaad
quote:Does it?
It asserts the kid spent the night in his home after he went to a gay bar
The kid who spent the night at your home? ... Full Stop.
Most parents have had sleepovers for their kids.
The one you went to the gay bar with? ... Full Stop.
"The one" doesn't actually specify a kid.
Plus each is formatted as a question, rather than a statement.
Now I agree with you 100% in terms of the insinuations, and I'd like to see liability if the innuendos are BS (which it appears they are). But the wording may be clever enough to avoid it.
2
Posted on 10/12/24 at 12:27 pm to RogerTheShrubber
For the sake of clarity.
Puritans were about purifying the faith, not each other
Purifying meant removing all catholic sacrament and non-scriptural practices
I am going off of memory, and I could be a little off here
The way you are using puritan, is in the modern misunderstanding of the term and group that has taken root.
Puritans were legit freaks, sexually speaking
Puritans were about purifying the faith, not each other
Purifying meant removing all catholic sacrament and non-scriptural practices
I am going off of memory, and I could be a little off here
The way you are using puritan, is in the modern misunderstanding of the term and group that has taken root.
Puritans were legit freaks, sexually speaking
Posted on 10/12/24 at 12:29 pm to NC_Tigah
That is a reach, and a decent defense in the strictest sense.
But it wouldn't really hold up to the scrutiny of a living person.
A judge and every juror would read those sentences as I have, and I am sure you have
But it wouldn't really hold up to the scrutiny of a living person.
A judge and every juror would read those sentences as I have, and I am sure you have
Posted on 10/12/24 at 12:33 pm to Roaad
quote:
It asserts the kid spent the night in his home after he went to a gay bar
No. It merely implies it.
You know…the kind of thing Tim Walz has done about his resume’ his entire political career.
Posted on 10/12/24 at 12:40 pm to Godfather1
Touchdown Timmy is still trending on X
Posted on 10/12/24 at 12:46 pm to boomtown143
New Tweet - Information will be released tomorrow.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
Posted on 10/12/24 at 12:49 pm to boomtown143
Posted on 10/12/24 at 12:58 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
The kid who spent the night at your home? ... Full Stop.
Most parents have had sleepovers for their kids.
The one you went to the gay bar with? ... Full Stop.
"The one" doesn't actually specify a kid.
I don't see these questions as insinuation. They are direct questions pose to Walz to confirm or deny. It is now up to Walz answer them.
Posted on 10/12/24 at 1:18 pm to La Place Mike
quote:Meh ... Why do you beat your wife? It's an innuendo.
I don't see these questions as insinuation.
Posted on 10/12/24 at 1:49 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Why do you beat your wife? It's an innuendo.
Its a "Do you remember" question. Very different.
Posted on 10/12/24 at 1:58 pm to La Place Mike
quote:Hey Judge Kavanaugh, do you remember raping poor little pristine Christine in 1985, or were you just too drunk to remember?
Its a "Do you remember" question. Very different.
Posted on 10/12/24 at 2:01 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Hey Judge Kavanaugh, do you remember raping poor little pristine Christine in 1985, or were you just too drunk to remember?
The girl who it turns out never met him?
I agree that Walz is rumor at the moment.
Time will tell if it turns out he's a pedo or just someone who's easy to see as a pedo
Judge K turns out to have never met her.
Posted on 10/12/24 at 2:08 pm to La Place Mike
quote:
They are direct questions pose to Walz to confirm or deny. It is now up to Walz answer them.
Yep - the answers should be easy if nothing there.
IF you have to resort to the lawyering of the nomenclature - save that for the defense atty's at your trial.
No hem-hawing about being a knucklehead and misspeaking at times are appropriate to the situation.
In fact - threaten to sue the accuser and bring the heat!!!
Posted on 10/12/24 at 2:09 pm to NC_Tigah
The new tweet seems to give a lot of detail.
However, until ALL of the info is released, it is simply innuendo.
It will still be so even at that point, as only the tipster can levy an actual accusation.
Still, having the receipts (time-stamped contact info) concerning the VP acct and the MSM will be an interesting read.
Of course, that’s IF it they are produced.
However, until ALL of the info is released, it is simply innuendo.
It will still be so even at that point, as only the tipster can levy an actual accusation.
Still, having the receipts (time-stamped contact info) concerning the VP acct and the MSM will be an interesting read.
Of course, that’s IF it they are produced.
Posted on 10/12/24 at 2:13 pm to jimmy the leg
Well this just got more interesting for Timmy
Posted on 10/12/24 at 2:18 pm to jimmy the leg
quote:
Still, having the receipts (time-stamped contact info) concerning the VP acct and the MSM will be an interesting read.
Gwen Walz mentioning the Indigo Girls concert a few days after this guy asked the campaign about it does reek of trying to get out in front of something.
Posted on 10/12/24 at 2:37 pm to Godfather1
quote:
Gwen Walz mentioning the Indigo Girls concert a few days after this guy asked the campaign about it does reek of trying to get out in front of something.
Allegedly
Posted on 10/12/24 at 2:40 pm to boomtown143
Most of us can easily believe that this happened.
Posted on 10/12/24 at 2:44 pm to KosmoCramer
quote:
Allegedly
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.nytimes.com/2024/08/20/us/tim-walz-gay-students.html
She and her husband had grown close to a gay student years earlier in Nebraska, where the Walzes met each other teaching at a public school. The couple took the student to an Indigo Girls concert, a spokeswoman for Ms. Walz said, the rare queer-friendly event in that time.
https://www.them.us/story/tim-walz-gwen-gay-student-indigo-girls-concert
Not allegedly
This post was edited on 10/12/24 at 2:46 pm
Posted on 10/12/24 at 2:45 pm to KosmoCramer
quote:
Gwen Walz mentioning the Indigo Girls concert a few days after this guy asked the campaign about it does reek of trying to get out in front of something.
quote:
Allegedly
Agreed.
That’s why producing the receipts matters. Otherwise…it simply innuendo.
Page 8 of 9
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News