Started By
Message

re: .

Posted on 7/22/14 at 10:26 pm to
Posted by Pinecone Repair
Burminham
Member since Nov 2013
7156 posts
Posted on 7/22/14 at 10:26 pm to
quote:

We evacuate the disabled, then burn the rest in an AIDS Fire.


We should let the "refugees" from the southern countries in and tell them if they survive and can turn it around within 3 years they earn citizenship.
This post was edited on 7/22/14 at 10:28 pm
Posted by BOSCEAUX
Where the Down Boys go.
Member since Mar 2008
48139 posts
Posted on 7/23/14 at 1:48 am to
quote:

I also dislike the fact that every problem is blamed on "the left" around here, and that anyone who disagrees with the group think is a "libtard".


It's fricking Detroit, who else are you going to blame? The citizens are lib takers and the politicians are lib idiots.
Posted by BOSCEAUX
Where the Down Boys go.
Member since Mar 2008
48139 posts
Posted on 7/23/14 at 2:02 am to
quote:

people living on less than $2 per day.


Then these people are too lazy to catch the bus to the nearest gubment building. The way our fricked up system is set up nobody and I mean nobody (not even illegals) only get $2 a day in assistance.
Posted by BOSCEAUX
Where the Down Boys go.
Member since Mar 2008
48139 posts
Posted on 7/23/14 at 2:04 am to
quote:

Seattle has been solidly liberal for a few decades, I believe.


Demographics??
Posted by BOSCEAUX
Where the Down Boys go.
Member since Mar 2008
48139 posts
Posted on 7/23/14 at 2:07 am to
quote:

if they survive and can turn it around within 3 years they earn citizenship.


I've been saying give Detroit to the Mexicans for years. Give them those jacked up old houses for nothing and see if they can do any better with that city, they can't do any worse.
Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
52065 posts
Posted on 7/23/14 at 2:45 am to
Words can't describe how much it pisses me off that a municipal matter protest has a sign "Turn on the water! Tax Wall Street!"



Who the frick can't pay their water bill anyway?

Working mini wage for the time they spent protesting would have paid it for a month most likely.
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 7/23/14 at 9:46 am to
quote:

Demographics??


No! We can't do that. That's racist!

Also Im guessing korkstand has never lived in Seattle...I have
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
432417 posts
Posted on 7/23/14 at 9:51 am to
quote:

So have a lot of successful cities. Execution matters.

population makes all sorts of "execution" easier or more difficult. you can take those of the highest intelligence and best culture and have them exist in communism to anarchy and it will work. the question is what we do with those of lesser intelligence and culture, aka the "trailer park problem"
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 7/23/14 at 9:55 am to
quote:

the question is what we do with those of lesser intelligence and culture, aka the "trailer park problem"


you don't work, you don't eat.

I would be all for responsible welfare, but that's a pipedream
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
28894 posts
Posted on 7/23/14 at 9:56 am to
quote:

Also Im guessing korkstand has never lived in Seattle...I have
Been there, lived in Portland. What's your point?
Posted by Vols&Shaft83
Throbbing Member
Member since Dec 2012
70007 posts
Posted on 7/23/14 at 10:00 am to
quote:

the question is what we do with those of lesser intelligence and culture, aka the "trailer park problem"


We process those poors into food for other poors. I thought we covered this?
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
28894 posts
Posted on 7/23/14 at 10:01 am to
quote:

We process those poors into food for other poors. I thought we covered this?
still giggling
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
432417 posts
Posted on 7/23/14 at 10:01 am to
this is a much bigger societal problem than just looking at examples like detroit, flint, baton rouge, etc

long-term, that population is not going to have much participation in the economy. we already see how much it has been affected by our current modernization of the economy. what do we do in 1-2 generations of tech advancement?

not only are the menial labor jobs that the population at issue relies on disappearing (and will continue to disappear), but the jobs are becoming very devalued AND with a glut of workers, the value decreases even more.
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 7/23/14 at 10:11 am to
quote:

long-term, that population is not going to have much participation in the economy


the amount of discouraged workers can be reduced but by how much. Has the economic downturn created more generational welfare (i.e. discouraged worker goes on welfare for the first time and goes "hey, not too bad") but welfare will always create a class of "discouraged workers"...the abuse is out of hand and while it is a bigger problem in urban areas, I agree that it is a nation wide problem.

quote:

we already see how much it has been affected by our current modernization of the economy

the net effect on jobs is negative; however new jobs are created, more jobs are lost...prices go down and things become more affordable. The frictional unemployment it creates leads to new industries and businesses. My econ 101 professor had two of the simplest examples ever. Poison was big, then nirvana was big. Time for poison to find something else. Ice man has a job, fridge is invented, ice man finds a new business. The economy is no different than natural selection, you adapt to survive, and when one avenue closes off, people are forced to adapt and find new things, create new industries, etc. Government "job protection" stifles the advancement of the human race...fact.

quote:

but the jobs are becoming very devalued AND with a glut of workers

the constraints placed on citizens by the government is making this a problem. There are more barriers in place for people who want to start their own business. We're trending towards European socialism, where giant corporations (which liberals claim to loathe) are the only ones who can handle the tax and regulatory burdens of government and therefore have less competition. Liberals actually vote them a bigger share of the marketplace.

just my thoughts
Posted by BobBoucher
Member since Jan 2008
17321 posts
Posted on 7/23/14 at 10:16 am to
regarding "discouraged workers' - dont make the assumption that they are all discouraged becuase welfare is better than work.

For many, work simply isnt an option and if we dont have social programs, theyre living in cardboard boxes, shitting on the sidewalks, spreading disease, and eating from your garbage.

Long ago, we saw that as the problem to prevent becuase we saw it around the rest of the world, and so we created social programs to keep ppl off the streets.

and well now we have catch 22.
This post was edited on 7/23/14 at 10:18 am
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 7/23/14 at 10:25 am to
quote:

dont make the assumption that they are all discouraged becuase welfare is better than work


I didn't, I only acknowledged that there is and has been for some time a sect of "discouraged workers" that aren't really discouraged workers...then I wondered if the economic downturn has added to this segment of the population via the introduction of the welfare lifestyle

quote:

work simply isnt an option

and government interference with the economy only worsens this plight. Moreover, government safety nets are so easily accessible and abused (and cannot exist any other way) that it further adds to the problem. I did interviews with homeless people working for some huckster where they would beg for money, give it to him and he would provide them a place to stay and food. The homeless people readily admitted that they don't want to work, and this guy was just keeping them in that mindset. We need to change the mindset. I think it would be cheaper to have better homeless shelters with systems in place for getting people back up on their feet and into the job market. Monitor their progress, etc. Some people don't want to be helped, and if they don't, then they can go. However, we have a generation, maybe more, of americans who have never been desperate for food. they live at the expense of the taxpayer and it is getting out of control.

When you're homeless, a minimum wage job and a studio apartment is better than sleeping on a cot at the shelter
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
28894 posts
Posted on 7/23/14 at 10:32 am to
quote:

the question is what we do with those of lesser intelligence and culture, aka the "trailer park problem"
Cut off their water and see what happens?

The root of the problem is that if you surround someone, anyone, with an environment of success, that person has a very good chance of also being successful. Similarly, if you put someone in a "trailer park" who doesn't know anything better, odds are that person won't be successful. There are exceptions to both, obviously, but this is how it works.

Cutting off the water to thousands of homes comes across as some sort of battle of attrition. Will the water dept get more of their money? Of course, right now, but it's not going to solve anything long-term. The ones who were able to pay but didn't want to will go right back to the old habits. The ones who wanted to pay but couldn't will have to deal with their water being cut off more and more as prices keep rising. And then some will say "frick this place" and leave, if they are able, further reducing the city's revenue and further increasing water bills for everybody else.

This "tough love" isn't going to solve the underlying problem, and neither will more assistance. The assistance programs we do have probably need to be scrapped altogether, and replaced with a single streamlined program that encourages responsibility and contributing, rather than encouraging having children.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
432417 posts
Posted on 7/23/14 at 10:46 am to
quote:

The root of the problem is that if you surround someone, anyone, with an environment of success, that person has a very good chance of also being successful. Similarly, if you put someone in a "trailer park" who doesn't know anything better, odds are that person won't be successful. There are exceptions to both, obviously, but this is how it works.

it works that way because both groups exclude the other

those who are capable of success tend to group with similar people. those who are not, group with those who are not

this creates a culture of success and a culture of failure (or as i've called it for years, "lower class mentality")

i don't get why people are shocked when these groups (of unintelligent people that intentionally group themselves amongst similar people, creating a lower culture) fail to reach objective success as a group. stupid people with a shitty culture will not produce many success stories. that's the root of the problem.

quote:

Cutting off the water to thousands of homes comes across as some sort of battle of attrition

Detroit is a poor city that cannot afford to pay for services while not requiring payment for those services

when the water department goes belly up, nobody gets water. how is that fair to those who pay?

quote:

And then some will say "frick this place" and leave, if they are able, further reducing the city's revenue

how is the emigration of people using more than they pay for going to reduce net revenue?

getting those people to move will be positive for the city, i reckon

quote:

This "tough love" isn't going to solve the underlying problem, and neither will more assistance. The assistance programs we do have probably need to be scrapped altogether, and replaced with a single streamlined program that encourages responsibility and contributing, rather than encouraging having children.

you still get back to the real problem (which is being exacerbated by the continuing, rapid advancement of our economy in terms of technology): stupid people with a shitty culture will not produce many success stories. what we as a society do to/for them is the problem
Posted by Pinecone Repair
Burminham
Member since Nov 2013
7156 posts
Posted on 7/23/14 at 10:57 am to
 The assistance programs we do have probably need to be scrapped altogether, and replaced with a single streamlined program that encourages responsibility and contributing, rather than encouraging having children

I agree with this 100%.

There are many moving parts that need to be changed in order for welfare dependency to no longer be a lifestyle.
I think these changes should start with a firm 5 year limit for food stamps. Only basic food items qualify. No chips,soda,candy,etc. Notices are sent every six months informing recipient of time remaining.

Generous tax incentives for businesses who hire and train welfare recipients.

7 year limit per family on section 8 voucher.

This last one is the most important IMO.

Public schools should begin separating college bound and trade kids in the 8th grade. Each year trade kids may attempt to test out of trade track and move to college track. Teach the trade kids a skill and have them licensed and ready to work by 18.
Offer incentives to businesses that participate.
Posted by BobBoucher
Member since Jan 2008
17321 posts
Posted on 7/23/14 at 10:59 am to
quote:

When you're homeless, a minimum wage job and a studio apartment is better than sleeping on a cot at the shelter


you would think, but they dont think like you and me.

Jump to page
Page First 9 10 11 12 13 ... 15
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 11 of 15Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram