- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

.
Posted on 10/30/22 at 7:50 am
Posted on 10/30/22 at 7:50 am
(no message)
This post was edited on 6/2/26 at 11:41 am
Posted on 10/30/22 at 7:51 am to OMLandshark
Yeh that simply isn’t correct at all
But it was smart of you to just post words and not a link from whatever loony arse website you pulled that from
This post was edited on 10/30/22 at 7:53 am
Posted on 10/30/22 at 7:54 am to OMLandshark
This is a good thing. That leadership team only lost money for the shareholders, and artificially propped up engagement with bots. They don’t deserve anything but two-weeks pay severance, not golden parachutes.
Never mind, I just realized they engaged in outright fraud. They’re lucky if they don’t go to jail.
Never mind, I just realized they engaged in outright fraud. They’re lucky if they don’t go to jail.
This post was edited on 10/30/22 at 7:56 am
Posted on 10/30/22 at 7:54 am to OMLandshark
quote:This isn’t football coaching. A “for cause” firing isn’t voiding the money they are owed from shares
I mean, they are going to sue him for it, but these people should be in fricking jail (Vijaya for sure) for the most part, so I think the for cause firing is very justified.
This post was edited on 10/30/22 at 7:55 am
Posted on 10/30/22 at 7:58 am to lsupride87
My guess is that if they engaged in fraud (they did), whatever they’re owed in their contract is most likely voided.
This post was edited on 10/30/22 at 8:00 am
Posted on 10/30/22 at 7:58 am to liz18lsu
Yeh, seriously. They would have to had broke laws or completely went rogue on policy in the magnitude of fraud to not get their shares.
Posted on 10/30/22 at 7:58 am to lsupride87
quote:
whatever loony arse website you pulled that from
The New York Times.
Posted on 10/30/22 at 7:59 am to Gifman
(no message)
This post was edited on 6/2/26 at 11:40 am
Posted on 10/30/22 at 8:00 am to Gifman
quote:
My guess is that if they engaged in fraud (they did)
precisely what they did, which was why there was so much angst among Twitter employees.
Posted on 10/30/22 at 8:01 am to lsupride87
quote:
had broke laws
Well, there is that...Allowing cyber-criminality.
Posted on 10/30/22 at 8:01 am to lsupride87
(no message)
This post was edited on 6/2/26 at 11:40 am
Posted on 10/30/22 at 8:02 am to lsupride87
quote:
lsupride87
quote:
But it was smart of you to just post words and not a link from whatever loony arse website you pulled that from
Posted on 10/30/22 at 8:02 am to OMLandshark
There is absolutely no way they are just going to lick their wounds and not take their buyout. Zero
Posted on 10/30/22 at 8:03 am to OMLandshark
quote:
Yeah, they did. They’ve been lying about the code for years.
It was an adult day care for these people, their little playground.
Posted on 10/30/22 at 8:04 am to lsupride87
(no message)
This post was edited on 6/2/26 at 11:39 am
Posted on 10/30/22 at 8:06 am to OMLandshark
This whole Golden parachute thing for millionaires already passes me off when regular employees get nothing
Posted on 10/30/22 at 8:06 am to OMLandshark
It’s probably time for a clean sweep of Twitter. It’s not always a bad thing
Posted on 10/30/22 at 8:08 am to lsupride87
quote:
Yeh that simply isn’t correct at all
Dude
Popular
Back to top

12







