- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Tonight's vote on the CR-billl gave us some clarity on who are not real conservatives
Posted on 12/19/24 at 8:10 pm to Taxing Authority
Posted on 12/19/24 at 8:10 pm to Taxing Authority
Tom Tiffany, rep from WI that voted against- 97% conservative score.
Obviously a RINO....
Obviously a RINO....
Posted on 12/19/24 at 8:11 pm to BayouBlitz
quote:
Extending to deficit spending is not conservative.
Right, let's just irreversibly implode the economy of the country and by extension, the whole world in a heartbeat before Trump can even get in office because our principles are more important.
This post was edited on 12/19/24 at 8:14 pm
Posted on 12/19/24 at 8:12 pm to David_DJS
quote:
What are they faking?
Being conservative. Do you know what they will ever vote for?
They seem to be obstructionists for pure political gain.
This post was edited on 12/19/24 at 8:16 pm
Posted on 12/19/24 at 8:14 pm to LSUSkip
quote:
Right, let's just irreversible implode the economy if the country and by extension, the whole world in a heartbeat before Trump can even get in office because our principles are more important.
This is RINO behavior in their natural habitat..
Posted on 12/19/24 at 8:15 pm to loogaroo
quote:
Do what know what they will ever vote for?
Do you smell toast?
Posted on 12/19/24 at 8:15 pm to SaintsReportExile
Posted on 12/19/24 at 8:16 pm to loogaroo
quote:
Do what know what they will ever vote for?
Perhaps a bill that wouldn't make Nancy Pelosi proud?
quote:
They seem to be obstructionists for pure political gain.
They seem to be taking on a promise by Trump of being primaried. I don't see the gain in that for them.
Posted on 12/19/24 at 8:16 pm to monsterballads
Well that's a start.
*KInda how it's supposed to be done.
*KInda how it's supposed to be done.
Posted on 12/19/24 at 8:16 pm to SaintsReportExile
Why do we get worked up about this every year? It’s political theater. Who gives a shite that our shitty government is shut down?
Posted on 12/19/24 at 8:17 pm to loogaroo
quote:Rhey tried to make the bill seem smaller in scope by reducing by 1300pages. But as Nancy Mace pointed out—it spends just as much. I think we weren’t supposed to notice that. Or the unlimited debt ceiling g increases tucked into the bill.
Political maneuver or spending money?
Just wild speculation on my part. Backing this bill seems so backwards it’s hard to make any sense of it.
This post was edited on 12/19/24 at 8:18 pm
Posted on 12/19/24 at 8:17 pm to LSUSkip
quote:
Right, let's just irreversibly implode the economy of the country and by extension, the whole world in a heartbeat before Trump can even get in office because our principles are more important.
I've heard Hakeem Jeffries and Nancy Pelosi make this argument about a dozen times the last few years.
Posted on 12/19/24 at 8:18 pm to David_DJS
Dude...you hate the Freedom Caucus.
Lake is one of them
Lake is one of them
Posted on 12/19/24 at 8:19 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
Rhey tried to make the bill seem smaller in scope by reducing by 1300pages. But as Nancy Mace pointed out—it spends just as much. I think we weren’t supposed to notice that. Or the unlimited debt ceiling g increases tucked into the bill.
Yep. They just took out the J6 stuff along with all the things the dems wanted that had nothing to do with a budget.
Same money and no debt ceiling.
Posted on 12/19/24 at 8:19 pm to monsterballads
quote:$5 says onlyTrumpkins try to give Trump credit for it if it happens.
REPORT: House GOP considers breaking the spending bill into smaller pieces to pass individually instead of all-in-one - POLITICO
This post was edited on 12/19/24 at 8:20 pm
Posted on 12/19/24 at 8:19 pm to loogaroo
quote:
Lake is one of them
Lake won an election? When did this happen?
Posted on 12/19/24 at 8:19 pm to loogaroo
quote:
Dude...you hate the Freedom Caucus.
Lake is one of them
Lake? Lake who?
Posted on 12/19/24 at 8:20 pm to loogaroo
quote:
Dude...you hate the Freedom Caucus.
Lake is one of them
Why would I hate something because Lake was a member? Lake loses achingly winnable elections, and for that I am critical AF. I'm not critical of her political positions.
Posted on 12/19/24 at 8:24 pm to BuckyCheese
quote:
Well that's a start.
*KInda how it's supposed to be done.
^ this
Posted on 12/19/24 at 8:45 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
and if the primary fails you get a D or an emboldened GOPe in that seat.
much smarter to target purple area D’s
That is the flawed thinking which has us in the situation we face right now.
No more compromise! Either grab the rope and pull or you will get trampled.
Posted on 12/19/24 at 8:53 pm to SaintsReportExile
quote:
rump needs to list them out individually to the American People and let them know who needs to be replaced.
Sorry if you think extending the debt limit out 2 years because you don’t want to deal with it the early summer of 2025 is conservative you’re a friggin idiot. There is never a good time to have a debt ceiling debate. In 2 years they’ll kick the can down the road because of the midterms and our debt problems roll on ad intonation. Trump should welcome a debt ceiling debate. He shouldn’t be scarred of it.
Now if you think that extending the debt ceiling for 2 years is the politically expedient thjng to do, fine. No argument there. But don’t call it conservative.
The lies some of yall believe is baffling.
Popular
Back to top



0




