- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Tina Peters data- 29k election records deleted or altered…
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:12 pm to Placekicker
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:12 pm to Placekicker
quote:
Tina Peters backing up the elections data before they bleach-bitched the systems clean, gave Americans a rare opportunity to analyze before and after the tampering — and it shows clear and deliberate manipulation of the voting systems.
• Audit trail deleted
• System logs deleted
• Voting files replaced with new files
more clerical errors..nothing to see here
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:13 pm to mwade91383
quote:
The judicial standard is a real thing, it has hold up against legitimate scrutiny
Given the activist judges that we have seen this year, and how they have ruled, legitimacy is not even in the equation.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:13 pm to Megasaurus
No this is more "made up bullshite" than "clerical errors"
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:14 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
No this is more "made up bullshite" than "clerical errors"
Actually there is one thing- 2020 was the most secure election ever…
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:15 pm to AlterEd
quote:
Those responsible need to be hauled into court. Like immediately.
Black Atlanta Democrats going to trial in front of black Atlanta Democrats. Good luck with that.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:19 pm to Placekicker
That’s just damage from the Water pipe that happened to break.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:27 pm to Placekicker
Well, you can continue pretending the vibes matter, but it’s gonna be rough sledding.
She was convicted by a jury of her peers (obviously, again compelling evidence) prosecuted by a Republican DA in a republican county.
She was screwed regardless of the judge. I dunno why you clowns do this to yourselves.
She was convicted by a jury of her peers (obviously, again compelling evidence) prosecuted by a Republican DA in a republican county.
She was screwed regardless of the judge. I dunno why you clowns do this to yourselves.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:31 pm to mwade91383
quote:
She was screwed regardless of the judge. I dunno why you clowns do this to yourselves
Corrupt judges in a corrupt state? It’s not a two-tiered system. It’s hierarchy. Liberals and their protected classes can do what they want, Conservatives get punished to the fullest extent of the law.
Why do we do this to ourselves? We want nothing but things to be equal. The law applied evenly. Everyone held accountable.
That’s not happening, so we will continue to bring attention to to it.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:37 pm to Placekicker
So you’ll just repeat ANYTHING you see on Twitter, huh?
What would another judge have done differently when the republican DA who prosecuted her got a guilty conviction from a jury of her peers?
Is the sentencing the issue for you? We can debate the merits of how long she got but if you’re pretending she’s innocent you’re too stupid to be reasoned with.
What would another judge have done differently when the republican DA who prosecuted her got a guilty conviction from a jury of her peers?
Is the sentencing the issue for you? We can debate the merits of how long she got but if you’re pretending she’s innocent you’re too stupid to be reasoned with.
This post was edited on 12/22/25 at 9:41 pm
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:37 pm to Placekicker
SFP supports Tina Peters' imprisonment.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:43 pm to mwade91383
quote:
What would another judge have done differently when the republican DA who prosecuted her got a guilty conviction from a jury of her peers?
Is the sentencing the issue for you? We can debate the merits of how long she got but if you’re pretending she’s innocent you’re too stupid to be reasoned with.
Republican? There are folks from both sides that are corrupt.
Ignoring the obvious election fraud because Liberals got away with it makes you “too stupid to be reasoned with.”
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:44 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
SFP supports Tina Peters' imprisonment.
I support her conviction, but not necessarily her imprisonment.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:46 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I support her conviction, but not necessarily her imprisonment.
So, he supports the election fraud that was ignored and Colorado got away with…
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:47 pm to Placekicker
quote:
So, he supports the election fraud that was ignored and Colorado got away with…
I never said any of that.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:50 pm to Placekicker
I didn’t say republican judge, I said another judge. Now you think the republican DA is corrupt? Just vibes on that too?
I guess you’re off the “activist judge” angle already, that didn’t take much.
“Obvious election fraud”, “activist judge”, I think you just like repeating buzzwords.
I guess you’re off the “activist judge” angle already, that didn’t take much.
“Obvious election fraud”, “activist judge”, I think you just like repeating buzzwords.
This post was edited on 12/22/25 at 9:52 pm
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:53 pm to Placekicker
So the gist of the county’s DemCommie spokesman’s long winded yet factually weak argument confirmed that her prosecution was because the truth was so damning and outrageous that lots of people were pissed.
In sum, they couldn’t allow the truth to spread.
In sum, they couldn’t allow the truth to spread.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:55 pm to mwade91383
quote:
“Obvious election fraud”, “activist judge”,I think you just like repeating buzzwords.
I enjoy seeing election fraud like this exposed. I love seeing liberals defend the fraud.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 10:00 pm to Placekicker
quote:
Corrupt judges in a corrupt state?
not a shred of evidence to support this claim
Posted on 12/22/25 at 10:02 pm to beaux duke
quote:
not a shred of evidence to support this claim
Except that Tina Peters is in prison for blowing the whistle on Democrat election fraud in Colorado.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 10:04 pm to Placekicker
Okay sure. But neither of those things are meaningfully happening at all. Nothing you’re suggesting has an iota of credibility in the real world (again, that pesky judicial standard).
Tina Peters isn’t going anywhere. We both know that. What’s the point of pretending you don’t know why, how does that help you?
Tina Peters isn’t going anywhere. We both know that. What’s the point of pretending you don’t know why, how does that help you?
Popular
Back to top


1






