Started By
Message

re: Time travel, simulation, matrix? Do your own research. No coincidences. Movie?

Posted on 4/26/26 at 9:01 pm to
Posted by Kafka
I am the moral conscience of TD
Member since Jul 2007
157377 posts
Posted on 4/26/26 at 9:01 pm to
This is the kind of serious political discussion the board has desperately needed
Posted by Endorphins
Member since Jun 2022
1614 posts
Posted on 4/26/26 at 9:19 pm to
I can't tell if you're being facetious or not. If you aren't, what do you conclude from what has transpired and some of these clues/coincidences?
Posted by South21
Member since Jul 2019
1839 posts
Posted on 4/26/26 at 9:43 pm to
quote:

I can't tell if you're being facetious or not. If you aren't, what do you conclude from what has transpired and some of these clues/coincidences?


Of course he's being facetious. Youre not the only one to be open and to review this kind of stuff, youre just the small % that actually believes it after reviewing it. Its ridiculous.
Posted by TigerDoc
Texas
Member since Apr 2004
11854 posts
Posted on 4/26/26 at 9:51 pm to
You're flailing because the thread is all vibe, no thesis.

Stipulate a take, baw, and let us connect some dots.
This post was edited on 4/26/26 at 10:28 pm
Posted by Endorphins
Member since Jun 2022
1614 posts
Posted on 4/26/26 at 9:53 pm to
I think you've read the situation wrong my friend. I've not made a conclusion yet, I was simply providing some clues to start the discovery. If this is your idea of research and confirming theories/possibilities, I feel sorry for you, and that is ridiculous.
Posted by djsdawg
Member since Apr 2015
41748 posts
Posted on 4/26/26 at 9:54 pm to
quote:

Fermi's Paradox is for a reason.


What is that reason?
Posted by djsdawg
Member since Apr 2015
41748 posts
Posted on 4/26/26 at 9:55 pm to
quote:

It was intentionally vague


Yea, so do better next time.
Posted by Cannon
Shreveport
Member since May 2015
1939 posts
Posted on 4/26/26 at 9:58 pm to
Endorphins lol wtf
Posted by TigerDoc
Texas
Member since Apr 2004
11854 posts
Posted on 4/26/26 at 10:01 pm to
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
43922 posts
Posted on 4/26/26 at 10:08 pm to
quote:

What is that reason?

So that we remain too far away from communicating with other life forms, even if we somehow could reach light speed ... at least until we have evolved enough to meet the minimum requirements of an intelligent species.

Probably about the time we hit Level II on the Kardashev Scale. We're not even .5 right now. And I'm not convinced that a Dyson Sphere is the way to get there given the materials required for that kind of build, even around a dwarf.

Nor am I convinced that our species will continue to exist past the merger with Ai.

All.of this is just the Simulation f-ing around with us.
Posted by Who_Dat_Tiger
Member since Nov 2015
25602 posts
Posted on 4/26/26 at 10:16 pm to
quote:

How could I forget I knew your screen name was familiar.

ahh OP is one of those Q clock loons, that explains a lot. Of all the Q rabbit holes I invested in nothing made me roll my eyes more than that. When I started seeing that ridiculousness that’s when I knew I attached my horse to the wrong wagon

capitalized letters in tweets on certain days in months with a harvest moon minus 3 days prior cuz the post is formatted like pi on the day Trump ate pie meant the storm was imminent, patriots in control. Absolute crazies
Posted by Othello
the Neptonian Steel Mines
Member since Aug 2013
25056 posts
Posted on 4/26/26 at 10:18 pm to
quote:


All the world’s a stage, and all the men and women merely players


Many a true word hath been spoken in jest.
Posted by RazorBroncs
Possesses the largest
Member since Sep 2013
16209 posts
Posted on 4/26/26 at 10:21 pm to
quote:

Well time travel into the past is impossible.



That's just not true.

It's actually more likely than traveling to the future which is considered highly impossible (aside from cryogenic freezing or simply finding ways to put one in 'stasis' or stored on digital hardware) which isn't technically time travel but just "waiting for a long time"

There's been many studies on this.

The elements that make up you, me, a banana, a truck, a gallon of sea water, a tree, a rock, and so on have existed forever and will always exist into eternity.

The atoms that make up those elements have certain markers that suggest their makeup both currently and in their past forms.

Hydrogen atoms in sea water are infinitesmally different than hydrogen atoms from my body, which are infinitesmally different than yours, which are infinitesmally different than ones that landed on an asteroid 1500 years ago, and so on.

If we crack this tiny difference we can hypothetically understand every bit of history of every part of physical existence.

If we can understand that, then we can reproduce it. Markers in atoms that makeup the elements that make everything can be manipulated to reproduce where they were, say, 1000 years ago.

We don't have the technology to do this on a large scale now and aren't even close, but it's theoretically possible. There's no way to travel into the future where eternal elements haven't existed in their physical forms yet.

Everything that's ever been is still here, and everything that's here now will be forever. Just in different atomic arrangements
Posted by Endorphins
Member since Jun 2022
1614 posts
Posted on 4/26/26 at 10:39 pm to
quote:

OP is one of those Q clock loons
Nothing could be further from the truth. I've never even considered the qclock. I've never researched it, I don't understand it, and I will not put time into looking into it. That was a meme post.
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
43922 posts
Posted on 4/26/26 at 10:43 pm to
quote:

All the world’s a stage, and all the men and women merely players

Actually NPCs ... most men and women, on this planet within this simulation, this construct, are NPCs. (Non-Player Characters)

Which explains a lot of the virus that causes homosexualty, transgenderism, and libtardedness ... as well as suicidal empathy ... as the virus infects the simulation/construct and eventually destroys either the program or eliminates all existing NPCs and advances the construct to exist sans NPCs (sic: biological humans awki).

quote:

Modern AI-Driven NPC Capabilities: Recent advancements in artificial intelligence have transformed NPCs from static background elements into complex social agents. Key developments include:

- Dynamic Dialogue: Natural Language Processing (NLP) and Large Language Models (LLMs) allow NPCs to generate context-aware, unscripted responses rather than relying on preset branches. 

- Social Simulation: Advanced networks enable NPCs to form relationships, remember past interactions, and exhibit personalities based on models like the OCEAN framework. 

- Adaptive Behavior: Using reinforcement learning and procedural generation, NPCs can now learn from player actions, adjust their strategies, and create emergent storytelling that varies between playthroughs. 

Simulation Theory: Context Outside of gaming, the term "NPC" is frequently applied to Simulation Theory, a philosophical hypothesis suggesting reality may be a computer-generated construct.  In this context, some speculate whether humans are "Player Characters" (PCs) with self-directed consciousness or "NPCs" operating on programmed routines. However, most philosophical discussions clarify that even if a simulation exists, NPCs within it would still possess full subjective experiences and agency, distinct from simple code. 


This thread, by the OP, was a gallant attempt to force NPCs out of their current reality and into one that is, at the very least, more aware ... less simple, more sophisticated.

If a tree falls in the woods and no one is there to hear it ... does it make a sound?

Does the tree even fall?

Does the tree even exist?
Posted by John somers
Los Proxima
Member since Oct 2024
1622 posts
Posted on 4/26/26 at 10:47 pm to
Sorry, not clicking a bunch of links.

If you want to convince, you:

1 Declare a thesis
2 Cite supporting evidence
3 Make summation tying evidence to thesis
Posted by Endorphins
Member since Jun 2022
1614 posts
Posted on 4/26/26 at 10:48 pm to
quote:

NPCs out of their current reality and into one that is, at the very least, more aware ... less simple, more sophisticated.

I don't think it was worth it at this point.
They can't even understand the premise of the thread.
Posted by Brotorious
NOLA
Member since May 2013
590 posts
Posted on 4/26/26 at 10:55 pm to
You can’t unknow what you know. Ignorance is bliss. Say what the frick you want to say.
Posted by South21
Member since Jul 2019
1839 posts
Posted on 4/26/26 at 11:44 pm to
quote:

So that we remain too far away from communicating with other life forms, even if we somehow could reach light speed ... at least until we have evolved enough to meet the minimum requirements of an intelligent species.

Probably about the time we hit Level II on the Kardashev Scale. We're not even .5 right now. And I'm not convinced that a Dyson Sphere is the way to get there given the materials required for that kind of build, even around a dwarf.

Nor am I convinced that our species will continue to exist past the merger with Ai.

All.of this is just the Simulation f-ing around with us.


I think its just fricking with you... im pretty cool with things in general.
Posted by rebeloke
Member since Nov 2012
17281 posts
Posted on 4/27/26 at 12:34 am to
People who say things like that are intellectually dishonest. It isn’t the slam dunk you think it is.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram