- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Thoughts on traditional childhood vaccines?
Posted on 10/17/23 at 10:37 am to GhostOfFreedom
Posted on 10/17/23 at 10:37 am to GhostOfFreedom
quote:
There probably should be less than 5. Not sure which ones
Riveting insight.
0
Posted on 10/17/23 at 10:38 am to burger bearcat
I don't have any children. If I did, I wouldn't let the Government pump anything into my kid/s. Not the Government we have now anyway. That's for sure.
Posted on 10/17/23 at 10:38 am to burger bearcat
quote:
Honest question, but why not? Aren't we dealing with the same players.
One is an experimental Rna vaccine.
The others are proven to work.
If you believe they are intentionally heavy metal poisoning people through vaccines carry on, but your question is disingenuous.
Posted on 10/17/23 at 10:41 am to notsince98
quote:
Nothing wrong with avoiding vaccines. Modern healthcare is so much better than it was historically. Children aren't dying from the vaccinated diseases.
If you want to do traditional vaccines, just try to stick to one at a time and wait 4 weeks between jabs.
These fricking morons are going to bring back long forgotten childhood diseases. JFC.
Posted on 10/17/23 at 10:48 am to burger bearcat
I can't remember the specific vaccines, but I read that some of our oldest, safe vaccines had serious side effects when first tested. Adjustments were made before the finished product was given to the public.
We didn't do that kind of long term testing of side effects with the Covid vaccines.
We didn't do that kind of long term testing of side effects with the Covid vaccines.
Posted on 10/17/23 at 10:49 am to CutTheCord
Most anti-vaxers (real ones, not the shite the media propagated) are Granola types. Hippies.
Posted on 10/17/23 at 10:50 am to cwill
My wife expressed concern with this same issue. We did some research and it seems there are no heavy metals in most of the main ones, though I’m not the best at reading medical articles. I do think it’s weird to give children vaccines for some stuff (like hep b, why does an infant need this if parents are clean?) but obviously good for others (polio, etc).
Most of us here were probably vaccinated as children and we’re all fi…. okay some of us are fine.
Most of us here were probably vaccinated as children and we’re all fi…. okay some of us are fine.
Posted on 10/17/23 at 10:57 am to burger bearcat
Posted on 10/17/23 at 10:57 am to kung fu kenny
The difference from when "we" were younger to the children now is about 20 more vaccines
Posted on 10/17/23 at 10:59 am to burger bearcat
They were tested really well and over a long period of time so people can judge informed.
Unlike some recent shots
Unlike some recent shots
Posted on 10/17/23 at 11:00 am to cwill
quote:
These fricking morons are going to bring back long forgotten childhood diseases.
No, you Democrats are doing that already with your open border bullzhit.
Posted on 10/17/23 at 11:03 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Most anti-vaxers (real ones, not the shite the media propagated) are Granola types. Hippies.
That was 10 years ago, now it's them and maga retards.
Posted on 10/17/23 at 11:05 am to burger bearcat
quote:
Thoughts on traditional childhood vaccines?
They worked
Posted on 10/17/23 at 11:05 am to Tiger971
I would be interested in a comparison of women over 35 having children in 1983 vs today.
Posted on 10/17/23 at 11:11 am to Tangineck
quote:
Please don't apply the same logic to an experimental Rna vaccine for a virus that has a functional 100% survival rate in children to 100 years of proven and effective vaccines for horrible diseases. The anti-vax movement exists because the vaccines work so well that these people have never seen these awful diseases in real life.
THIS! there is no comparison of the tried-and-true vaccines versus the Covid "Vax". The Conflation of the two camps, in my opinion intentional in many cases, irritates the shite out of me. Wanting no part of the Covid shot in no way equates to disavowing other legitimate vaccines.
Posted on 10/17/23 at 11:12 am to Tiger971
Found what I was looking for
It is a fact children born with autism is higher among older mothers and that number has sky rocketed.
It is a fact children born with autism is higher among older mothers and that number has sky rocketed.
Posted on 10/17/23 at 11:14 am to I B Freeman
I would be as well. I also think it isn't unreasonable for a desire to re-evaluate a lot of these vaccines. The list has really exploded over the last decade or two and correlated side effects have also grown by leaps and bounds.
Could be the aggressive schedule they are administered, could be something in how certain ones interact together. Could be none of it and there is some completely unrelated factor (like late age pregnancies or something as you mentioned). I do think we are in a dangerous area right now where things can't even be questioned or at least urged to be re-analyzed without being labeled as some conspiracy theorist.
Plenty of the anti-vax people are nuts, but I think the last few years have shown that blind faith in the pharma community is not something they have earned. Skepticism is good. Blindly going in one direction (either blindly anti-vax or blindly do whatever pharma says) is a bad position and the one we are currently moving towards because of how people treat issues like this when legitimate questions do get raised.
Could be the aggressive schedule they are administered, could be something in how certain ones interact together. Could be none of it and there is some completely unrelated factor (like late age pregnancies or something as you mentioned). I do think we are in a dangerous area right now where things can't even be questioned or at least urged to be re-analyzed without being labeled as some conspiracy theorist.
Plenty of the anti-vax people are nuts, but I think the last few years have shown that blind faith in the pharma community is not something they have earned. Skepticism is good. Blindly going in one direction (either blindly anti-vax or blindly do whatever pharma says) is a bad position and the one we are currently moving towards because of how people treat issues like this when legitimate questions do get raised.
This post was edited on 10/17/23 at 11:17 am
Posted on 10/17/23 at 11:21 am to burger bearcat
Pediatricians get a bonus for having a practice where over 63% of their patients are "up to date"
co worker had trouble finding a pediatrician because his kid wasnt "up to date" so the pediatricians wouldnt see him, said he was a risk.
https://twitter.com/ChildrensHD/status/1666195736386494477
co worker had trouble finding a pediatrician because his kid wasnt "up to date" so the pediatricians wouldnt see him, said he was a risk.
https://twitter.com/ChildrensHD/status/1666195736386494477
This post was edited on 10/17/23 at 11:23 am
Posted on 10/17/23 at 11:21 am to burger bearcat
We don’t do any vaccines for our kids. These DRs all get kick backs from the vaccine manufacturers. And a lot of large DR offices will force you to vaccinate your kids or they will not see your kid. Clearly they are doing that because they care about our kids and not for vaccine manufacturer kick backs.
Posted on 10/17/23 at 11:36 am to Mid Iowa Tiger
quote:
We had our kids vaccinated with some and not others. We also chose carefully the source/manufacturers of the vaccines we used.
Would you mind sharing your list of ones you elected to get and the source/manufacturers?
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News