- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Thoughts on kids and school lunches
Posted on 12/3/19 at 12:21 pm to LSUFanHouston
Posted on 12/3/19 at 12:21 pm to LSUFanHouston
quote:
Again, I'll ask, since you refuse to answer...
Once you take the kid away, then what?
Once you punish the parent, then what?
I don't even understand your question.
We have some parents who flat out can't parent. Not feeding your child when you are provided the resources to feed your child is child abuse.
We don't leave children with child abusers.
Posted on 12/3/19 at 12:21 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
I submit that one reason we need more foster parents is that we have too many incompetent parents and one of the reasons we have so many incompetent parents is because we subsidized incompetent parenting.
Fair point.
So... how do we stop that?
How do we stop dumb, poor kids from having unprotected sex and getting knocked up? Because if you want to talk about the base of the problem... that's it.
Posted on 12/3/19 at 12:22 pm to Wtodd
quote:That's what I said earlier.
and feed the kids at school and deduct this $$$ from the parents
It's still a blunt tool, but, better than just subsidizing the behavior you hope to reduce.
Posted on 12/3/19 at 12:22 pm to moneyg
quote:
MAY 21, 2019 — The amount spent per pupil for public elementary and secondary education (prekindergarten through 12th grade) for all 50 states and the District of Columbia increased by 3.7% to $12,201 per pupil during the 2017 fiscal year,
quote:
Average Private School Tuition Cost. The national average private school tuition is approximately $10,676 per year (2019-20). The private elementary school average is $9,638 per year and the private high school average is $14,522 per year.
So private HS costs more than public, and public elementary costs less than public. Sounds about right.
Also, you are talking about average costs. We all know the average private school pretty much sucks. That's why they have room for voucher kids... The good ones (the ones who don't take vouchers) cost more.
Posted on 12/3/19 at 12:23 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
I don't even understand your question.
We have some parents who flat out can't parent. Not feeding your child when you are provided the resources to feed your child is child abuse.
We don't leave children with child abusers.
This.
It's a strange position to take that a hungry child at school is so sad we must do something, but we are ok with leaving them with parents who continuously refuse to feed their kids.
Posted on 12/3/19 at 12:23 pm to Bedhog
They are all too fat. Take away any food at school. Metamucil water out of the water fountains.
Posted on 12/3/19 at 12:24 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
It's still a blunt tool, but, better than just subsidizing the behavior you hope to reduce
We don't fix the problem its going to skyrocket
Posted on 12/3/19 at 12:24 pm to LSUFanHouston
quote:You don't "stop" it.
How do we stop dumb, poor kids from having unprotected sex and getting knocked up?
But, you DO recognize that there is ABSOLUTELY a subset in this group who didn't get "knocked up"..........they WANTED to get pregnant and go on aid. I've known these people personally. They PLAN it.
You will never reduce the number of morons who just get pregnant to zero, but, you probably should try and keep that number to just the morons and not add to it.
So, when welfare mom doesn't feed her kid, take her fricking welfare........and, if necessary, her meal ticket. That message will get out. Trust me.
Posted on 12/3/19 at 12:25 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
They PLAN it.
And this is why we have to make able bodied people go hungry.
Posted on 12/3/19 at 12:26 pm to LSUFanHouston
quote:
So private HS costs more than public, and public elementary costs less than public. Sounds about right.
Also, you are talking about average costs. We all know the average private school pretty much sucks. That's why they have room for voucher kids... The good ones (the ones who don't take vouchers) cost more.
What's your point?
Posted on 12/3/19 at 12:26 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
I'm referring to the fact that even by charging kids, they cost more than the revenue charged.
Here's something you may not know about the school lunch program.
Part of every child's lunch is funded by the feds. Even the ones who pay.
Let's say the per-child lunch cost is $2.40. Let's say they charge $1.25. The feds are already paying for $1.15 of every child's meal. Then, the feds kick in an extra $1.25 per child for every child on free lunch. Let's say the reduced price is 40 cents. Then, the feds kick in an extra 85 cents per child for those kids.
That's how government funding works - you charge less than the actual cost, because the funding handles the difference.
Posted on 12/3/19 at 12:29 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
I don't even understand your question.
We have some parents who flat out can't parent. Not feeding your child when you are provided the resources to feed your child is child abuse.
We don't leave children with child abusers.
What I am saying is that there aren't enough foster parents in the system now, to handle the demand we have.
If we add to the demand, it's going to make things even worse.
If we have no other choice, we have no other choice. But I don't want to move a kid from a bad situation to a worse one, either, and that's what you would do with the lack of additional foster care parents.
And foster care, you say is bad... but it's better than a state home, which is where most of the kids will end up. Get ready for that cost...
Posted on 12/3/19 at 12:29 pm to LSUFanHouston
quote:
Here's something you may not know about the school lunch program.
Part of every child's lunch is funded by the feds. Even the ones who pay.
Let's say the per-child lunch cost is $2.40. Let's say they charge $1.25. The feds are already paying for $1.15 of every child's meal. Then, the feds kick in an extra $1.25 per child for every child on free lunch. Let's say the reduced price is 40 cents. Then, the feds kick in an extra 85 cents per child for those kids.
That's how government funding works - you charge less than the actual cost, because the funding handles the difference.
Let me help you out here.
You just described government math.
I can GUARANTEE you that included in that "cost of providing lunch" to the kids..........you will NOT find........
Kitchen equipment and mainteance
Electrical expenses
Increased fire insurance caused by large scale cooking
FULL cost of the employees who provide the lunch
etc
etc
etc
It's a money loser
Posted on 12/3/19 at 12:30 pm to LSUFanHouston
quote:
Here's something you may not know about the school lunch program.
Part of every child's lunch is funded by the feds. Even the ones who pay.
Let's say the per-child lunch cost is $2.40. Let's say they charge $1.25. The feds are already paying for $1.15 of every child's meal. Then, the feds kick in an extra $1.25 per child for every child on free lunch. Let's say the reduced price is 40 cents. Then, the feds kick in an extra 85 cents per child for those kids.
That's how government funding works - you charge less than the actual cost, because the funding handles the difference.
I think this post summarizes the disconnect. Some people think Federal (or any govt) money isn't real and their position is really just a question of whether "free lunch" is better than "not free lunch".
The cost is the cost regardless of who pays it fella.
Posted on 12/3/19 at 12:31 pm to LSUFanHouston
quote:I submit that being in an orphanage is greater than being with an adult who can't be bothered to feed you.
What I am saying is that there aren't enough foster parents in the system now, to handle the demand we have.
Just sayin
quote:Can you describe this "worse" situation than being with the type of parents who sincerely feed you so little that we think it's an emergency to ensure you're fed at school?
But I don't want to move a kid from a bad situation to a worse one
quote:And, BOTH of those are better than being with the type of parents who sincerely feed you so little that we think it's an emergency to ensure you're fed at school
And foster care, you say is bad... but it's better than a state home, which is where most of the kids will end up. Get ready for that cost...
Posted on 12/3/19 at 12:33 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
So, when welfare mom doesn't feed her kid, take her fricking welfare........and, if necessary, her meal ticket. That message will get out. Trust me.
Please understand that in theory, I am not disagreeing with you.
I do think that you don't have a full grasp on the backside of what you are suggesting. Taking these kids away are going to create a set of problems that in my opinion, are much worse than the problems you would be trying to solve. Not to mention, much more expensive problems are being created.
Sure, you would save some money by paying out less in benefits, but the added costs will be higher, unless we can find a way to get a lot more wealthy people to become foster parents.
Posted on 12/3/19 at 12:35 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
It's a money loser
Maybe it is semantics, but everything is obviously being paid for.
You seem to be advocating for dismantling the school lunch program.
I'm not at that place. I still think it provides a lot of benefits.
Posted on 12/3/19 at 12:37 pm to moneyg
quote:
I think this post summarizes the disconnect. Some people think Federal (or any govt) money isn't real and their position is really just a question of whether "free lunch" is better than "not free lunch".
The cost is the cost regardless of who pays it fella.
I understand that, and I also understand there is a lot of waste in government spending.
If you are worried about the extra cost, get rid of a couple of dozen useless central office staffers.
Posted on 12/3/19 at 12:38 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
I submit that being in an orphanage is greater than being with an adult who can't be bothered to feed you.
Interesting. I disagree.
But at least I am seeing your point of view, which I do appreciate, even if I disagree with it
Posted on 12/3/19 at 12:39 pm to LSUFanHouston
quote:I can think of a few school administrators that could go away.
If you are worried about the extra cost, get rid of a couple of dozen useless central office staffers.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News