Started By
Message

re: Thoughts on kids and school lunches

Posted on 12/3/19 at 12:21 pm to
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 12/3/19 at 12:21 pm to
quote:

Again, I'll ask, since you refuse to answer...

Once you take the kid away, then what?

Once you punish the parent, then what?

I don't even understand your question.

We have some parents who flat out can't parent. Not feeding your child when you are provided the resources to feed your child is child abuse.

We don't leave children with child abusers.
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
37044 posts
Posted on 12/3/19 at 12:21 pm to
quote:

I submit that one reason we need more foster parents is that we have too many incompetent parents and one of the reasons we have so many incompetent parents is because we subsidized incompetent parenting.


Fair point.

So... how do we stop that?

How do we stop dumb, poor kids from having unprotected sex and getting knocked up? Because if you want to talk about the base of the problem... that's it.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 12/3/19 at 12:22 pm to
quote:

and feed the kids at school and deduct this $$$ from the parents

That's what I said earlier.

It's still a blunt tool, but, better than just subsidizing the behavior you hope to reduce.
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
37044 posts
Posted on 12/3/19 at 12:22 pm to
quote:

MAY 21, 2019 — The amount spent per pupil for public elementary and secondary education (prekindergarten through 12th grade) for all 50 states and the District of Columbia increased by 3.7% to $12,201 per pupil during the 2017 fiscal year,


quote:

Average Private School Tuition Cost. The national average private school tuition is approximately $10,676 per year (2019-20). The private elementary school average is $9,638 per year and the private high school average is $14,522 per year.


So private HS costs more than public, and public elementary costs less than public. Sounds about right.

Also, you are talking about average costs. We all know the average private school pretty much sucks. That's why they have room for voucher kids... The good ones (the ones who don't take vouchers) cost more.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
56425 posts
Posted on 12/3/19 at 12:23 pm to
quote:

I don't even understand your question.

We have some parents who flat out can't parent. Not feeding your child when you are provided the resources to feed your child is child abuse.

We don't leave children with child abusers.



This.

It's a strange position to take that a hungry child at school is so sad we must do something, but we are ok with leaving them with parents who continuously refuse to feed their kids.
Posted by flyAU
Scottsdale
Member since Dec 2010
24848 posts
Posted on 12/3/19 at 12:23 pm to
They are all too fat. Take away any food at school. Metamucil water out of the water fountains.
Posted by Wtodd
Tampa, FL
Member since Oct 2013
67482 posts
Posted on 12/3/19 at 12:24 pm to
quote:

It's still a blunt tool, but, better than just subsidizing the behavior you hope to reduce

We don't fix the problem its going to skyrocket
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 12/3/19 at 12:24 pm to
quote:


How do we stop dumb, poor kids from having unprotected sex and getting knocked up?
You don't "stop" it.

But, you DO recognize that there is ABSOLUTELY a subset in this group who didn't get "knocked up"..........they WANTED to get pregnant and go on aid. I've known these people personally. They PLAN it.

You will never reduce the number of morons who just get pregnant to zero, but, you probably should try and keep that number to just the morons and not add to it.

So, when welfare mom doesn't feed her kid, take her fricking welfare........and, if necessary, her meal ticket. That message will get out. Trust me.
Posted by Wtodd
Tampa, FL
Member since Oct 2013
67482 posts
Posted on 12/3/19 at 12:25 pm to
quote:

They PLAN it.

And this is why we have to make able bodied people go hungry.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
56425 posts
Posted on 12/3/19 at 12:26 pm to
quote:

So private HS costs more than public, and public elementary costs less than public. Sounds about right.

Also, you are talking about average costs. We all know the average private school pretty much sucks. That's why they have room for voucher kids... The good ones (the ones who don't take vouchers) cost more.




What's your point?
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
37044 posts
Posted on 12/3/19 at 12:26 pm to
quote:

I'm referring to the fact that even by charging kids, they cost more than the revenue charged.


Here's something you may not know about the school lunch program.

Part of every child's lunch is funded by the feds. Even the ones who pay.

Let's say the per-child lunch cost is $2.40. Let's say they charge $1.25. The feds are already paying for $1.15 of every child's meal. Then, the feds kick in an extra $1.25 per child for every child on free lunch. Let's say the reduced price is 40 cents. Then, the feds kick in an extra 85 cents per child for those kids.

That's how government funding works - you charge less than the actual cost, because the funding handles the difference.
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
37044 posts
Posted on 12/3/19 at 12:29 pm to
quote:

I don't even understand your question.

We have some parents who flat out can't parent. Not feeding your child when you are provided the resources to feed your child is child abuse.

We don't leave children with child abusers.


What I am saying is that there aren't enough foster parents in the system now, to handle the demand we have.

If we add to the demand, it's going to make things even worse.

If we have no other choice, we have no other choice. But I don't want to move a kid from a bad situation to a worse one, either, and that's what you would do with the lack of additional foster care parents.

And foster care, you say is bad... but it's better than a state home, which is where most of the kids will end up. Get ready for that cost...
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 12/3/19 at 12:29 pm to
quote:

Here's something you may not know about the school lunch program.

Part of every child's lunch is funded by the feds. Even the ones who pay.

Let's say the per-child lunch cost is $2.40. Let's say they charge $1.25. The feds are already paying for $1.15 of every child's meal. Then, the feds kick in an extra $1.25 per child for every child on free lunch. Let's say the reduced price is 40 cents. Then, the feds kick in an extra 85 cents per child for those kids.

That's how government funding works - you charge less than the actual cost, because the funding handles the difference.


Let me help you out here.

You just described government math.

I can GUARANTEE you that included in that "cost of providing lunch" to the kids..........you will NOT find........

Kitchen equipment and mainteance
Electrical expenses
Increased fire insurance caused by large scale cooking
FULL cost of the employees who provide the lunch
etc
etc
etc

It's a money loser
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
56425 posts
Posted on 12/3/19 at 12:30 pm to
quote:

Here's something you may not know about the school lunch program.

Part of every child's lunch is funded by the feds. Even the ones who pay.

Let's say the per-child lunch cost is $2.40. Let's say they charge $1.25. The feds are already paying for $1.15 of every child's meal. Then, the feds kick in an extra $1.25 per child for every child on free lunch. Let's say the reduced price is 40 cents. Then, the feds kick in an extra 85 cents per child for those kids.

That's how government funding works - you charge less than the actual cost, because the funding handles the difference.



I think this post summarizes the disconnect. Some people think Federal (or any govt) money isn't real and their position is really just a question of whether "free lunch" is better than "not free lunch".

The cost is the cost regardless of who pays it fella.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 12/3/19 at 12:31 pm to
quote:

What I am saying is that there aren't enough foster parents in the system now, to handle the demand we have.

I submit that being in an orphanage is greater than being with an adult who can't be bothered to feed you.

Just sayin

quote:

But I don't want to move a kid from a bad situation to a worse one
Can you describe this "worse" situation than being with the type of parents who sincerely feed you so little that we think it's an emergency to ensure you're fed at school?

quote:

And foster care, you say is bad... but it's better than a state home, which is where most of the kids will end up. Get ready for that cost...

And, BOTH of those are better than being with the type of parents who sincerely feed you so little that we think it's an emergency to ensure you're fed at school
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
37044 posts
Posted on 12/3/19 at 12:33 pm to
quote:

So, when welfare mom doesn't feed her kid, take her fricking welfare........and, if necessary, her meal ticket. That message will get out. Trust me.



Please understand that in theory, I am not disagreeing with you.

I do think that you don't have a full grasp on the backside of what you are suggesting. Taking these kids away are going to create a set of problems that in my opinion, are much worse than the problems you would be trying to solve. Not to mention, much more expensive problems are being created.

Sure, you would save some money by paying out less in benefits, but the added costs will be higher, unless we can find a way to get a lot more wealthy people to become foster parents.
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
37044 posts
Posted on 12/3/19 at 12:35 pm to
quote:

It's a money loser


Maybe it is semantics, but everything is obviously being paid for.

You seem to be advocating for dismantling the school lunch program.

I'm not at that place. I still think it provides a lot of benefits.
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
37044 posts
Posted on 12/3/19 at 12:37 pm to
quote:

I think this post summarizes the disconnect. Some people think Federal (or any govt) money isn't real and their position is really just a question of whether "free lunch" is better than "not free lunch".

The cost is the cost regardless of who pays it fella.


I understand that, and I also understand there is a lot of waste in government spending.

If you are worried about the extra cost, get rid of a couple of dozen useless central office staffers.
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
37044 posts
Posted on 12/3/19 at 12:38 pm to
quote:

I submit that being in an orphanage is greater than being with an adult who can't be bothered to feed you.


Interesting. I disagree.

But at least I am seeing your point of view, which I do appreciate, even if I disagree with it
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
73426 posts
Posted on 12/3/19 at 12:39 pm to
quote:

If you are worried about the extra cost, get rid of a couple of dozen useless central office staffers.
I can think of a few school administrators that could go away.
first pageprev pagePage 9 of 10Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram