- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: This SPLC Thing is a Bigger Deal Than Most Realize
Posted on 4/22/26 at 4:08 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 4/22/26 at 4:08 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:That's about 15 folks
These baws
2
Posted on 4/22/26 at 4:09 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
The SPLC paid a POS to organize Charlottesville.
That is not what the indictment even says.
It says F-37 "was a member of the online leadership chat group that planned the 2017 'Unite the Right' event in Charlottesville" and says nothing about SPLC paying him to organize it.
The indictment also says he attended the rally at their direction and helped coordinate transpiration to the event (it's not clear if this was under SPLC "direction").
F-37 is a piece of shite and was one prior to SPLC working with him and appears to have continued to be one long thereafter, including likely today.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 4:09 pm to AlterEd
quote:
This SPLC Thing
These clowns funded Charlottesville then ran on it and the "good people on both sides" hoax for years.
They'll stili reference the "good people" quote today with 0 irony or shame.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 4:09 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
This is not something CNN, or any other news outlet, invented.
Half of Charlottesville attended
Posted on 4/22/26 at 4:09 pm to NC_Tigah
Which is much fewer than the number of fake nazis on the SPLC payroll.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 4:10 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
That's about 15 folks
That's only one of the numerous neo-Nazi or white supremacist organizations that was present. There were numerous ones and hundreds/thousands there outside of affiliation to any organization.
Then there were also hundreds/thousands of counter-protestors, and probably a bunch of people there to watch the chaos without any extremist views one way or the other (the very fine people).
This post was edited on 4/22/26 at 4:11 pm
Posted on 4/22/26 at 4:11 pm to Honkus
quote:
They'll stili reference the "good people" quote today with 0 irony or shame.
Trump did a terrible job communicating before and after the event.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 4:13 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The SPLC paid a POS to organize Charlottesville.
---
That is not what the indictment even says.
quote:This is getting tiresome.
F-37 was a member of the online leadership chat group that planned the 2017 "Unite the Right" event in Charlottesville, Virginia and attended the event
at the direction of the SPLC.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 4:15 pm to NC_Tigah
Slow is trying to litigate this one in the public opinion asap, with plans to gaslight us later.
SOP
SOP
Posted on 4/22/26 at 4:20 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
This is getting tiresome.
I said that
quote:
The indictment also says he attended the rally at their direction
Posted on 4/22/26 at 4:22 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:I know .... "LOTS..."
That's only one of the numerous neo-Nazi or white supremacist organizations
quote:Staged, albeit not a tough ask with the adjacent UVA campus of 25K students being warned White Supremacists were in route. But the SPLC lit the powder keg that got one of them killed. Hurray! You're defending that?
thousands of counter-protestors
Posted on 4/22/26 at 4:24 pm to SaintsReportExile
And the GOP will help them ignore it, as usual
Posted on 4/22/26 at 4:25 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:NO SIR!
The indictment also says he attended the rally at their direction
The indictment says he "planned and attended the event
at the direction of the SPLC"
Posted on 4/22/26 at 4:26 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
But the SPLC lit the powder keg that got one of them killed.
Where is the evidence of this?
If you blamed the ACLU for defending the rights of the racists, that would make sense. They had a direct, integral role.
The SPLC, at worst, seems to have had a single racist drive a couple other racists to the event. Small potatoes compared to the large population appearing on the side of the racists, neo-Nazis, and white supremacists.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 4:28 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:The indictment says he "planned and attended the event" at the direction of the SPLC"
Where is the evidence of this?
Who planned the event?
Under whose direction?
Posted on 4/22/26 at 4:28 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
The indictment says he "planned
It doesn't even say this, directly. It says he was part of a group that planned it, but, that has nothing to do with the SPLC's role.
It only says they directed him to attend, and they supervised some racist postings he made....and that he drove some attendees to the rally (doesn't assign any relationship or role of SPLC here)
Posted on 4/22/26 at 4:29 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
This is getting tiresome.
That's probably his objective...and to derail the thread.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 4:31 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The SPLC, at worst, seems to have had a single racist drive a couple other racists to the event.
They could have saved a couple hundred thousand bucks just using Uber.
Weird they went this route instead.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 4:33 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
The indictment says he "planned and attended the event" at the direction of the SPLC"
It doesn't.
Attended? Yes.
Planned? No.
This is a compound predicate.
F-37 was a member of the online leadership chat group that planned the 2017 "Unite the Right" event in Charlottesville, Virginia
and
attended the event at the direction of the SPLC.
I'll let AI get into the details
quote:
Grammatically, the direction from the SPLC applies only to the attendance.
In a compound predicate, a qualifying phrase (a prepositional phrase or a modifier) placed at the end of the sentence generally attaches itself to the nearest verb or the specific verb phrase it follows.
Sentence Breakdown
Action 1: "F-37 was a member of the online leadership chat group..."
Action 2: "...and attended the event at the direction of the SPLC."
Because the phrase "at the direction of the SPLC" follows "attended" and is separated from the first verb ("was") by the coordinating conjunction "and," it modifies the second action. If the writer intended for the direction to cover both actions, the sentence would typically be structured differently to "nest" both verbs under the modifier.
quote:
How to Change the Meaning
To see how the logic shifts, compare these variations:
Direction for Attendance Only (Your Sentence):
quote:
"F-37 was a member of the group and attended the event at the direction of the SPLC."
(The membership is stated as a fact; the attendance is the directed action.)
Direction for Both:
quote:
"At the direction of the SPLC, F-37 became a member of the group and attended the event."
(Moving the phrase to the front applies it to the entire predicate.)
Explicit Split:
quote:
"F-37 was a member of the group, and he attended the event; both actions were at the direction of the SPLC."
quote:
The "Rule of Proximity"
In legal and formal writing, the Rule of Last Antecedent (though usually applied to nouns) often informs how we read these structures: modifiers qualify the words immediately preceding them. Without a comma after "group" or a restructuring of the sentence, there is no grammatical link connecting the SPLC's "direction" to the initial act of being a group member.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 4:35 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Are you okay?
The SPLC, at worst, seems to have had a single racist drive a couple other racists to the event
Distracted posting?
Page 24 of 32
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News