re: This is what the Marxist dems are fighting for.

quote:

---

You have conveniently avoided responding to posts from me over the last week or so.

---

Yes, I have.

You are an imbecile, and not worth my time.

quote:

---

you are a condescending asshat.

---

To you? Oh yeah.

No you have not asshat - a couple examples:

re: Drag Show At aTm, Draggieland
Posted by AquaAg84 on 3/25/25 at 6:08 pm
quote:
I've never attended.

Apparently you have?

I suspect that it is primarily men dressed as women, singing show tunes. Is that your experience?


So after your initial perceived 'gotcha' response, you came back to it almost an hour later to edit. Which to me seems that you are covering up something by trying to deflect.

I am aware of the Rocky Horror Picture Show movie as I grew up in a small Texas near Austin/SA back in the 70s and was made aware of it through TV commercials, etc., but have never seen it. It was widely promoted back then and I believe is to this day it still has a cult-like following.

My question would be why do you always jump onto threads involving current trans related issues? And supporting directly or indirectly the continuation of such nonsense that has infiltrated society today related to, topics such as trans infiltrating women's sports, or drag queens involved in the education of kids (such as 'story time'). BTW, why aren't there reports of drag queens reading stories/supporting folks in rest homes? Why is the target always kids? Hmmmmmm?

I suspect you will respond and state you have never supported any of the specifics pointed out in the above paragraph, however the fact remains that you, for some reason, gravitates like a chicken to a June bug to trans-related posts.

If a response is made, I expect one that is a snarky response with insults pieced in here and there. For all to see.

Another:

re: Crazed woman berates, attacks a man wearing a MAGA hat on NYC subway, then face plants
Posted by AquaAg84 on 3/21/25 at 8:41 pm
Skimming through this thread. My observations: 1) The entity Hank is likely a troll, 2) Perhaps if not a troll, this entity once reinstated is a condescending asshat. For this thread, this poster posed that two folks or sides were involved when it was clearly an aggression from a woman towards a guy wearing a MAGA cap. And took over the thread from that point going forward which is the goal. Again this entity has not yet responded to ClientNumber9's post on I suspect a condescending snarky response to this post which will include insults,

3/17/25 at 1:30 pm. Here again is this post below.

From ClientNumber9

Let me help you, AggieHank, because this is what I do for a living. I have two decades of enforcing federal immigration law.

Khalil does not enjoy the same 1st Amendment rights as an American Citizen. Khalil is a Lawful Permanent Resident (aka, "green card" holder). While this gives him broad rights in terms of coming and going from the US, owning property, etc., he has certain obligations that you and I don't have. For example, Permanent Residents have an expectation to "support the democratic form of government". (This link is taken directly from the US Citizenship and Immigration Services website.) Khalil has been accused of directly supporting named terrorist organizations and advocating against the United States.

Another way to lose your Permanent Residency status is through willful misrepresentation. I'm certain Khalil did not mention on his immigration application that he was harbored pro-Hamas beliefs and would be working to foment rebellion against the country he was seeking to enter. (Yes, there are blanks on the form that cover this.) Therefore, the United States can argue he willfully misrepresented his purpose for entry.

Finally, take a peek at the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, specifically Section 212(a)(3)(C)(i). Under this law, the United States Secretary of State may deem a non-citizen deportable if he/she thinks their presence or activities may harm U.S. interests. Reread that sentence. Take it all in and let it wash over you.

ETA: Source- 10 years as a Border Patrol agent, 10 years working for an investigative three letter agency.

quote:

---

It says mixed bathroom right on the sign

---

Yes, it does. And that should be a lesson for all those who imagined that 'neutral' bathrooms are the cure all fix for this issue.

It isn't. Allowing people in elected seats of power or influence to permit and promote 'trans rights' as meaning men allowed access to spaces exclusively for women has to end now. Zero tolerance.

There are issues where no middle ground exists.

quote:

---

AggieHank's first post on this matter is to vilify the OP.

---

he's very angry with the OP, the would be child rapist not so much

They also want to have their way with your children. They are all sicko libturds.

Pathetic that you're siding with an attempted child rapist.


But that's par for the course for you, huh?


A woman goes into a single use bathroom, it's a woman's bathroom. Not too hard to understand. Most followers of common decency would acknowledge that. But you'd rather fight over semantics and die on that hill than simply admit you're wrong.

So siding with at attempted child rapists it is.


Got it.

quote:

---

Was it a unisex bathroom, though?

---

If you watched the video, you would clearly see the woman's sign. It's the one with the skirt, which I know is confusing for your kind, but it's simple memorization.

quote:

---

It says mixed bathroom right on the sign

---

So you think it is legal to rape someone in a mixed bathroom?