- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: This is what got Patel and Bongino to cave on Epstein suicide.
Posted on 5/22/25 at 9:59 am to omegaman66
Posted on 5/22/25 at 9:59 am to omegaman66
quote:
If it is the former why can't we see it it?
I explained why.
If you want a summary, read the OP of this thread (and many other similar ones on the topic). Again, this isn't about Epstein's crimes, only his suicide.
quote:
Not a single John has been prosecuted
Epstein and Maxwell were prosecuted. Andrew should be, but ya know.
This post was edited on 5/22/25 at 10:00 am
Posted on 5/22/25 at 10:00 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
And if they release information that refutes this, you will accept that information?
If the information is irrefutable.
Posted on 5/22/25 at 10:01 am to GumboPot
quote:
If the information is irrefutable.
Proving my point.
It will never be enough, not when the alternative facts are infinite.
Posted on 5/22/25 at 10:03 am to Geekboy
Im still going with it was a cia black mail op.
So of course nothing comes of it because it implicates the US government.
So of course nothing comes of it because it implicates the US government.
Posted on 5/22/25 at 10:04 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I explained why.
No. You put forth nothing of substance. Your nothing explanations suck.
Posted on 5/22/25 at 10:08 am to theballguy
quote:
One thing for sure, this ^ is either true or it's just too big and implicates too many people. Probably the former.
It's as if oral sex were a crime. Who all are you going to convict?
Posted on 5/22/25 at 10:08 am to omegaman66
quote:
No. You put forth nothing of substance.
I'll repost a 1st grade level explanation
quote:
And that comment doesn't say that NOBODY can be added as part of the CT, but the list will never be enough. Just think of all the "must haves" that the CT type will require or else they'll think a cover up occurred. Like, for example, let's say they nail Bill Clinton (which is effectively worthless) but John Roberts isn't included. What % of the CT types will claim there is a coverup? I'd imagine AT LEAST half. They want Clinton, Roberts, Obama, Gates, and all those big names they've been promised. All of them.
As I just posted to Gumbo, that mythical list is literally infinite. Any reporting will always face the moving target of this infinite amount of alternative facts.
People like Kash are smart enough to know how this could damage them. Again, JUST LOOK AT OP. That was only about Epstein's suicide and it's created a huge CT reaction/melt.
Posted on 5/22/25 at 10:13 am to Geekboy
If it makes you feel better just consider Patel and Bongino are FOS. You can then let it go because if this administration isn’t going to do anything about it, nothing more will happen.
Posted on 5/22/25 at 10:14 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
It's almost assured that the truth is nowhere near what y'all believe it to be
Hate to agree but that’s where I’m at on this subject. The girls were underage but runaways and made money and came home. It was to gather dirt on politicians but I don’t believe there was child sacrifice like some think.
Posted on 5/22/25 at 10:15 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I truly believe Epstein is a hot potato because it's not nearly as salacious as it's been built to be for 20 years and anyone who releases the info will get comments like this thread. It's almost assured that the truth is nowhere near what y'all believe it to be and the lack of evidence will be see as evidence of a conspiracy. This purported laundry list of big names being part of the terrible crimes likely just doesn't exist.
Okay, so adding SFP to the list.
Posted on 5/22/25 at 10:17 am to momentoftruth87
quote:'
It was to gather dirt on politicians but I don’t believe there was child sacrifice like some think.
That's a whole 'nother level of hot potato, but yeah, THAT part of it almost assuredly won't be as salacious as some CTs believe.
That level of belief isn't the majority I wouldn't imagine, but those people are often the loudest in their melt stage about this stuff.
Posted on 5/22/25 at 10:17 am to timdonaghyswhistle
quote:
Okay, so adding SFP to the list
I'm a nobody. Why would Epstein let me mingle with his people?
Posted on 5/22/25 at 10:18 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
It will never be enough, not when the alternative facts are infinite.
This is why you go to law school.
Posted on 5/22/25 at 10:21 am to SlowFlowPro
The way tigeronthemountain used to brag about financing tigerdroppings parties made it seem like weird shite went on there too
Joke of course as I don’t believe that but he made it seem like a secret party up on the mountain.
Joke of course as I don’t believe that but he made it seem like a secret party up on the mountain.
Posted on 5/22/25 at 10:23 am to momentoftruth87
I don't know about that.
The only funding I know of was just me (IIRC) paying for some stuff for the flag football game in 2008, and then an MLB pitcher and his model fiance buying 100 shots at BBG at the OTGT@BBG that night.
And there was a TD-sponsored tailgate on the parade grounds in 2007. Not sure if they actually supplied anything of note (I had the radio show so I was late and missed all the people who wanted to beat me up).
Of all of the hundreds of other IRL examples I've been a part of, I don't remember any third party funding of anything.
The only funding I know of was just me (IIRC) paying for some stuff for the flag football game in 2008, and then an MLB pitcher and his model fiance buying 100 shots at BBG at the OTGT@BBG that night.
And there was a TD-sponsored tailgate on the parade grounds in 2007. Not sure if they actually supplied anything of note (I had the radio show so I was late and missed all the people who wanted to beat me up).
Of all of the hundreds of other IRL examples I've been a part of, I don't remember any third party funding of anything.
This post was edited on 5/22/25 at 10:24 am
Posted on 5/22/25 at 10:33 am to Geekboy
Because they have access to the blackmail files and are using it against the elites.
Posted on 5/22/25 at 11:00 am to Picayuner
quote:
I was looking to see if Patel was blinking in Morse code. Both he and Bongino made it very clear that they are not compromised BUT have the threat of death to them and family.
If this were truly the case, then that's how the "clients" should be handled. If they're too powerful for the law to get them then let a busboy with a suppressor handle it.
Posted on 5/22/25 at 11:09 am to SlowFlowPro
It is every bit as a salacious as one can imagine. Listen to Darryl Cooper's take on sexual blackmail of government officials involving underage victims.
Why do you always simp for the most favorable view of those who like Epstein, are the most guilty?
Oh wait, I know...you're an attorney -- one more interested in winning a debate than you are in any actual justice.
Why do you always simp for the most favorable view of those who like Epstein, are the most guilty?
Oh wait, I know...you're an attorney -- one more interested in winning a debate than you are in any actual justice.
Posted on 5/22/25 at 11:11 am to Geekboy
Both Kash and Bongino have effectively been made institutional stooges.
They have been bought off.
They have been bought off.
Popular
Back to top



1







