re: 'This is the alt-right: Richard Spencer's horrifying abortion rant'

I don't know that it has to be in that stark of terminology, if there is some special significance to "murder" in your usage.

If it's an unjustified taking of life, in any variation, I think being pro life fits fine in a libertarian worldview.

So he's in the mold of Margaret Sanger?

This is the premise of Idiocracy

quote:

---

Eugenics is evil.

---

Yes, but dysgenics is worse.

quote:

---

Personally, I would not be comfortable with a fetus that I had a part in creating being aborted. But I don't think a fetus that hasn't developed to a certain point should be considered a human and that people should be able to abort that fetus if they want to without the government getting in their way. The laws being proposed like forcing people to have a symbolic funeral are absolutely insane. That is where the libertarian aspect comes into play.

---

Well I agree, to some extent. I think generally, from a libertarian perspective (I'm not a full fledged proper libertarian, but I lean libertarian), it's either legal or not. I don't believe much in chipping away at something via legislation.

I do believe that pro life legislators/leaders should focus on convincing the country that they're right as to abortion, setting up an eventual law change. But piecemeal morality measures intended to make a currently legal action more difficult is at odds with my ideas about government.

quote:

---

Who is purposefully breeding so their children will have bad traits?

---

Their vote plantation masters. Keep them dumb and dependent and you'll have a steady crop of votes.

Please tell me you aren't serious...

Damn son, it's like you're wearing two tin foil hats at the same time...

From the moment of conception science has definitively proven it is an individual human being.

What you need to be honest about is your belief at what point does a human being have the right to live.

Wherever you think that point should be, whether the young haven't earned the right to live or the old aren't useful and should be put down just know that once you walk that road it ends with someone deciding for reasons that make sense to them that you don't deserve to live.

That is your choice, choose wisely.

quote:

---

False. Please show me a credible source. As for the rest of your post, you're just making me out to be a bad guy now because I don't agree with you.

Simple logic would say that a zygote is not a human.

---

I'm sure you've never heard of the law of Identity.

Simply put a thing is itself and cannot be anything else, A is A.

The law of identity requires that a human being at the beginning of its life cycle is no more or less a member of the species than at any point in its life cycle.

There is one way, and one only to create a human being. If this were not so you could invalidate the law of identity by demonstrating another way to do so.

Now getting back to your childish denial of science. I'm not sure just how stupid you are, but your example of "logic" isn't giving me hope your IQ is over room temperature so I'll start with the easy basics.

The human life cycle as defined on reference.com LINK

Now you could go with any basic textbooks on human physiology that will tell you the same thing and go into more details around the physiological changes in a human being as they develop. That's probably above your level right now but if you have a college library they should have something that'll work.

If not there is always Amazon LINK

Once you get the primers down we can move on to Taxonomy and the real advanced course The human Genome project and the science of Genetics.