Started By
Message

re: This guy is actually literally shaking about the RvW reversal

Posted on 6/25/22 at 11:44 pm to
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128742 posts
Posted on 6/25/22 at 11:44 pm to
Ok. Then you were intentionally correct. My apologies.
Posted by KAGTASTIC
Member since Feb 2022
7989 posts
Posted on 6/26/22 at 5:20 am to
This was a funny response

LINK
Posted by Snipe
Member since Nov 2015
16649 posts
Posted on 6/26/22 at 5:38 am to
Is he auditioning for the role of the Joker in some new upcoming movie?

These are the kind of people red flag laws need to be applied to. My guess is he has a list of people written down already.
Posted by Bernie Bierman
Member since Mar 2019
2154 posts
Posted on 6/26/22 at 5:50 am to
Posted by Nosevens
Member since Apr 2019
19186 posts
Posted on 6/26/22 at 6:12 am to
Dude ???
Posted by themunch
bottom of the list
Member since Jan 2007
71766 posts
Posted on 6/26/22 at 6:16 am to
quote:

The judges never said they weren’t going to over turn it


Newest talking fad point.
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
36595 posts
Posted on 6/26/22 at 6:26 am to
It’s a bad showing of what they call “short stop thinking” on this. It doesn’t take a law degree to compose the thought that the ideal and expected default position from potential justices during confirmation, or hell really just any time and all the time, is that a nominee can and must only swear to consider only the law (Constitution or otherwise) as applied to the factual scenario that may come before them. Nobody in their right mind would lock in the permanent belief that the jurisprudence resulting from Roe could ever be reviewed again, particularly and most relevantly in the case of a new/novel question with proper standing and otherwise ripe for review on the subject works its way through the federal court system. That’s a preposterous concept on its face.
Posted by Wednesday
Member since Aug 2017
17271 posts
Posted on 6/26/22 at 6:34 am to
1- I thought that among his freaky tribe males are not allowed an opinion

2- even though his viewpoint makes it possible for him to bang all the angry members of the vagina hat squad and be immune from the consequences of an “unplanned pregnancy” - this dude is not getting laid. I’ve never been in a fist fight. Even I could kick this dude’s arse. Ladies don’t like the idea of having relations with a guy who they don’t perceive as capable of protecting them.

3- Why do all the leftist arguments about abortion assume that women are incapable of selecting their sexual partners and worse, that if they get preggos from a stupid drunken decision or from an occasion that they chose poorly (see Stripper who banged Hunter Biden)- that they cannot compel the man to financially take care of the baby? Perhaps these angry leftists who are so concerned about dooming these babies to a life of poverty should focus instead on assistance to mothers who are students, longer maternity leave, and enforcement of support obligations from fathers - instead of insisting that we should murder our offspring bc we were drunk at the time, or sterilize men.

It seems like anathema to survival of our species (not that this dude is getting laid anytime soon)
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram