- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: “They’re Repulsive” - Tucker’s Rant on How Baby Boomers Betrayed Gen Z.
Posted on 7/26/25 at 8:07 am to joshnorris14
Posted on 7/26/25 at 8:07 am to joshnorris14
quote:
This is like talking to a 70 year old child, which perfectly encapsulates the point.
no it's just a fact you'll own nothing and like it. you want to know who to blame look in the mirror
Posted on 7/26/25 at 8:08 am to Free888
quote:56 here but yeah, the rest of what you said except for student loans. They had none and they appreciate that.
You sure about that chief? I retired at 59, paid off my kids student loans, and helped them with down payments on their first houses. Maybe you’re just jealous and lazy.
Posted on 7/26/25 at 8:11 am to dickkellog
quote:
no it's just a fact you'll own nothing and like it. you want to know who to blame look in the mirror
I make great money and have a truly blessed life. I also think of other people than myself who won't have the things that I have to the point of being degrading to society.
Families should be able to have more than 1-2 children (and our society needs it).
Mothers should easily be able to stay at home to raise their children (and our society needs it).
I guess the silver lining is we may have a decade of solvency for Social Security and then the Boomers may finally be cut off from the teeth and can experience some of the pain they've caused.
This post was edited on 7/26/25 at 8:12 am
Posted on 7/26/25 at 8:32 am to joshnorris14
quote:
I make great money and have a truly blessed life. I also think of other people than myself who won't have the things that I have to the point of being degrading to society.
i've never wasted a minute worrying about how my generation was doing collectively karen and your definition of "doing great and truly blessed" are very different from mine.
here's what you're going to do karen, you're going to get your arse out there on that corner and go make my social security money biotch. i've paid in the maximum since i was 26 and i'm gonna get mine.
63% of american's pay no income tax maybe we could start there.
Posted on 7/26/25 at 8:34 am to CitizenK
quote:
When my father retired he immediately got a front license plate, "Spending My Kids' Inheritance" Why should I have taken issue with that? He earned all of that money himself. As a BOOMER, I did have some greedy motive to be offended like your greedy arse does.
I'm not arguing that he couldn't do that.
I'm certainly not arguing he shouldn't enjoy his retirement.
I'm not even arguing that if you or your children are obnoxious or entitled he shouldn't cut them out if he doesn't think they would value the potential inheritance they would be receiving.
I'm arguing that starting with that mentality that families shouldn't aspire to leaving legacies that will result in sound fiscal foundations whether its through building businesses to pass on like you see in Asian families or at a minimum helping grandkids when possible either to minimize their student loans or help them with a downpayment on a house is a very strange and not very admirable mindset for a parent to have and one that leads to other cultures where that mindset is expected coming to America and outperforming white families financially.
If wealth isn't taught, built and passed on to some degree it almost guarantees poor generational financial outcomes.
And to be clear my parents were never in a position to provide me with money so it has nothing to do with me personally, but the mindset that I've seen many of that age brag about.
Posted on 7/26/25 at 9:56 am to tide06
Dumbass to the max. The "Greatest Generation" (I think those in the late 1700's were that fighting for freedom with risk of losing everything) had good jobs when they came home, able to afford vacations their ancestors never could, while saving money. Boomers didn't have that at all most fields were fully employed. How many boomers lost jobs in the 1970s Rust Belt or the 1980's oil price collapse, also with lots of chemical manufacturing closing? How many paid 17% interest or higher on mortgages for homes? Yet many were able to persevere unlike the limps wristed younger generations. Yes, Gen X wasn't really that tough as they claim to be. I have no problems with them but give me a phucking break you clueless moron.
As for Tucker the Stupid Phucker, he had a plush and lush childhood with a far leftist mother who had a large ranch and oil wells galore and a daddy who bankrupted Look magazine after it was sued by fake news article he wrote. Tucker ended up with the oil well revenue in his inheritance. He's just a whiny little biotch who is followed by lots of clueless suckers. He's been fired from every job little preppy liberal arts degree from a leftist small college soy boy.
As for Tucker the Stupid Phucker, he had a plush and lush childhood with a far leftist mother who had a large ranch and oil wells galore and a daddy who bankrupted Look magazine after it was sued by fake news article he wrote. Tucker ended up with the oil well revenue in his inheritance. He's just a whiny little biotch who is followed by lots of clueless suckers. He's been fired from every job little preppy liberal arts degree from a leftist small college soy boy.
Posted on 7/26/25 at 10:38 am to CitizenK
quote:
Boomers didn't have that at all most fields were fully employed. How many boomers lost jobs in the 1970s Rust Belt or the 1980's oil price collapse, also with lots of chemical manufacturing closing
you think they wouldve leaned a lesson instead of voting to ship the jobs in this country overseas
Most blue collar boomers are alright in what they believe. White collar boomers are the worst. It also differs by what part of the country they are from. And if they are urban or rural and what kind of media they have consumed in their life
Posted on 7/26/25 at 10:47 am to joshnorris14
quote:The needs of society are secondary to the personal needs of the ME generation (the boomers).
Families should be able to have more than 1-2 children (and our society needs it).
quote:See my statement above.
Mothers should easily be able to stay at home to raise their children (and our society needs it).
Posted on 7/26/25 at 10:49 am to Grumpy Nemesis
quote:Actually that is literally the modern American public education system created by the Boomers. Elementary school is designed to make unruly boys behave like nice polite girls.
I should add that the Boomers aren't the ones who ingrained into Dylan that he was naturally bad just because he was a boy. And that the best way he could go about behaving correctly was if he behaved more like a girl
This post was edited on 7/26/25 at 10:50 am
Posted on 7/26/25 at 11:23 am to Gravitiger
quote:
Actually that is literally the modern American public education system created by the Boomers. Elementary school is designed to make unruly boys behave like nice polite girls.
and in your case it worked congratulations betty!
Posted on 7/26/25 at 11:26 am to joshnorris14
What a whiny victim you are.
Posted on 7/26/25 at 11:28 am to Gravitiger
quote:This is true.
Actually that is literally the modern American public education system created by the Boomers. Elementary school is designed to make unruly boys behave like nice polite girls.
The modern education system from elementary to the university is a byproduct of the 60s/70s boomer philosophers.
The system is an extension of their heavily progressive feminist ideals.
Posted on 7/26/25 at 11:31 am to 10thyrsr
quote:What in the everloving F!
And you continue to work long after you should have retired because you have no thought that the workforce needs younger people to come into the workforce and replace you to continue the process.
Here's a clue 10thyrsr: Capitalism determines what capitalism needs ... all the time, everywhere/. If a company would benefit from younger workers, but shirks the need, another smarter company will eat its lunch.
Posted on 7/26/25 at 11:31 am to Scruffy
quote:I think it is more of a social control mechanism, rather than a result of any genuine progressive ideology, but we ultimately reach the same conclusion.
This is true.
The modern education system from elementary to the university is a byproduct of the 60s/70s boomer philosophers.
The system is an extension of their heavily progressive feminist ideals.
Posted on 7/26/25 at 11:33 am to NC_Tigah
quote:Sure, except for workplace age regulations that make it not a truly free labor market. We don't live in mythical Adam Smith world.
What in the everloving F!
Here's a clue 10thyrsr: Capitalism determines what capitalism needs ... all the time, everywhere/. If a company would benefit from younger workers, but shirks the need, another smarter company will eat its lunch.
This post was edited on 7/26/25 at 11:36 am
Posted on 7/26/25 at 11:51 am to CitizenK
To be clear I don’t think anyone on this board is individually responsible for macro economic trends.
Most boomers on this board are conservative and hard working but there probably isn’t a single one who was in congress to have a vote on any of what’s happened.
But this is the reality of the changes from the 1960s to the present:
Inflation adjusted cost for college education in the US:
1960: $10,600 per year
2020: $40,700 per year (283% increase?
Inflation adjusted median home value: 1960: $230k
2020: $662k (188% increase)
National debt in billions:
1960: $268
2024: $34000 (12487% increase)
Inflation adjusted avg wage:
1967: $20.27
2025: $22.65 (11.74% increase)
So the cost of primary purchases like education and housing are up ~200% adjusted for inflation from when boomers acquired them and wages only went up 11% meaning it takes decades longer to pay for them at the new prices.
At the same time the politicians during that period ran up $30T in debt that now has to be paid off.
No one views any of that as anything but catastrophically bad for future generations, so while the stock market has gone up those new generations don’t care because they can’t afford to invest because they’re paying off student loans and saving for a down payment.
Most boomers on this board are conservative and hard working but there probably isn’t a single one who was in congress to have a vote on any of what’s happened.
But this is the reality of the changes from the 1960s to the present:
Inflation adjusted cost for college education in the US:
1960: $10,600 per year
2020: $40,700 per year (283% increase?
Inflation adjusted median home value: 1960: $230k
2020: $662k (188% increase)
National debt in billions:
1960: $268
2024: $34000 (12487% increase)
Inflation adjusted avg wage:
1967: $20.27
2025: $22.65 (11.74% increase)
So the cost of primary purchases like education and housing are up ~200% adjusted for inflation from when boomers acquired them and wages only went up 11% meaning it takes decades longer to pay for them at the new prices.
At the same time the politicians during that period ran up $30T in debt that now has to be paid off.
No one views any of that as anything but catastrophically bad for future generations, so while the stock market has gone up those new generations don’t care because they can’t afford to invest because they’re paying off student loans and saving for a down payment.
Posted on 7/26/25 at 11:58 am to Gravitiger
quote:If boomers, and I don't think it is, it would be a left wing subset of boomers that just happened to have been closeted in that category by when they were born. But, this is a whole different indoctrination of left wing nutjobs that have run our education into the ground to little Johnny won't get left behind the smarter kids. I would say education has changed more in the last 10-15 years by people younger than the boomer ages. But, whatever!
Actually that is literally the modern American public education system created by the Boomers. Elementary school is designed to make unruly boys behave like nice polite girls.
Posted on 7/26/25 at 12:01 pm to Diamondawg
Yeah, when boomers were teaching and in administration, kids were able to be paddled. Now, not so much.
Posted on 7/26/25 at 12:06 pm to joshnorris14
quote:
can experience some of the pain they've caused.
Posted on 7/26/25 at 12:18 pm to Diamondawg
quote:Boomers took "whole language" reading nationwide. Boomers created Common Core mathematics. Boomers created "social advancement" and No Child Left Behind. Boomers created FASFA and federally subsidized student loans. Boomers run the massive profit-from-your-tax-dollars indoctrination machines that are textbook publishers. Boomers created our current tax policy that underfunds education at all levels.
If boomers, and I don't think it is, it would be a left wing subset of boomers that just happened to have been closeted in that category by when they were born. But, this is a whole different indoctrination of left wing nutjobs that have run our education into the ground to little Johnny won't get left behind the smarter kids. I would say education has changed more in the last 10-15 years by people younger than the boomer ages. But, whatever!
It's only since Millennials got into teaching and admin that we've gone back to phonics and arithmetic.
Who do you think taught the "left wing nutjob" in their BS.Ed program? A boomer!
This post was edited on 7/26/25 at 5:48 pm
Popular
Back to top


1




