- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
The Wise Latina Warns of Political Consequences in Supreme Court Abortion Case
Posted on 12/1/21 at 11:55 am
Posted on 12/1/21 at 11:55 am
She mad.....
LINK
quote:
You want us to reject that right of viability and adopt something different. Fifteen justices over 50 years have, or I should say 30 since Casey, have reaffirmed that basic viability line. Four have said no, two of them members of this court. But 15 justices have said yes, of varying political backgrounds. Now the sponsors of this bill, the House bill in Mississippi, said we are doing it because we have new justices. The newest ban that Mississippi put in place, the six-week ban, the Senate sponsor said we’re doing it because we have new justices on the Supreme Court. Will this institution survive the stench that this creates in the public perception that the constitution and its reading are just political acts?
LINK
29
Posted on 12/1/21 at 11:57 am to jatilen
quote:
Will this institution survive the stench
It has survived your arse so far
quote:
just political acts
Like ghey marriage?
Posted on 12/1/21 at 11:58 am to jatilen
So, legislative acts OF THE SUPREME COURT should be seen as forever binding?
Posted on 12/1/21 at 11:58 am to jatilen
That’s an interesting way to say she strongly supports the killing of black children in Mississippi.
Posted on 12/1/21 at 12:00 pm to jatilen
quote:Ironically, these exact words could have been stated during the arguments of Roe v Wade. There is nothing in the Constitution that supports the right to an abortion. It was a right created out of thin air.
Will this institution survive the stench that this creates in the public perception that the constitution and its reading are just political acts?
Posted on 12/1/21 at 12:00 pm to jatilen
quote:
Will this institution survive the stench that this creates in the public perception that the constitution and its reading are just political acts?
She's GOT to be kidding.
Posted on 12/1/21 at 12:01 pm to jatilen
quote:
Will this institution survive the stench that this creates in the public perception that the constitution and its reading are just political acts?
Well, it is surviving her stench, so I am gonna say yes.
Posted on 12/1/21 at 12:04 pm to jatilen
I actually agree with the overarching principle: Politics should be nowhere near this issue. SCOTUS should ONLY rule on the constitutionality of law.
Period.
That being said, I don't think she and I would agree on what meets that standard.
Period.
That being said, I don't think she and I would agree on what meets that standard.
Posted on 12/1/21 at 12:05 pm to jatilen
Are you sure she's the "WISE" latina and not "WIDE" latina?
Posted on 12/1/21 at 12:12 pm to jatilen
Sotomayor is a fricking Zampolit in black robes.
Posted on 12/1/21 at 12:15 pm to jatilen
Activist judge disappointed that people see court as a political hockey puck. Now do Obamacare and gun control.
The problem is not a politicized court now. The problem is the unjust, extra-constitutional, immoral acts of a politicized court previously.
The problem is not a politicized court now. The problem is the unjust, extra-constitutional, immoral acts of a politicized court previously.
Posted on 12/1/21 at 12:16 pm to Ag Zwin
quote:
I actually agree with the overarching principle: Politics should be nowhere near this issue. SCOTUS should ONLY rule on the constitutionality of law.
Almost every significant ruling by the courts has been due to an activist judge making a politicized ruling based on their political prejudices. We all agree it shouldn't be like this. Wasn't my side that started it.
Posted on 12/1/21 at 12:17 pm to jatilen
hey Sotomayor 
and the black jesus you rode in on.
and the black jesus you rode in on.
Posted on 12/1/21 at 12:18 pm to jatilen
quote:
The Wise Latina
Shut up and make me a torta.
Posted on 12/1/21 at 12:20 pm to jatilen
What about the stench of the SCOTUS sanctioning infanticide in the first place?
Posted on 12/1/21 at 12:22 pm to jatilen
Everything done in politics is a political act. Does she expect us to believe members of the Supreme Court are somehow above political leanings?
Posted on 12/1/21 at 12:22 pm to jatilen
Even RBG said R v Wade was flawed. If Thomas made a political statement like Sotomayor did what would happen?
Posted on 12/1/21 at 12:26 pm to jatilen
She continues to be the poster child for shitty SCOTUS choices.
I may disagree with zombie RBG or Kagan but they are at least competent. Sotomayor only holds her job due to racial preferences in hiring.
I may disagree with zombie RBG or Kagan but they are at least competent. Sotomayor only holds her job due to racial preferences in hiring.
Posted on 12/1/21 at 12:32 pm to FooManChoo
quote:
Will this institution survive the stench that this creates in the public perception
Why does public perception need to be accounted for when dealing with the law? Isn't that the point of the law?
Page 1 of 3
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News