Started By
Message
locked post

The Wikipedia Scam

Posted on 5/16/19 at 9:21 am
Posted by NikolaiJakov
Moscow
Member since Mar 2014
2803 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 9:21 am
I made the mistake of trying to read the Wikipedia article on our President. It is written like a left wing hack job, and quotes the media (who have a deep seeded hatred for Trump and don't even try to hide it) to make statements like "Trump has made many false or misleading statements" and "his comments following a 2017 far right rally in Charlottesville were seen as implying a moral equivalence between white supremacist marchers and those who protested them".

There is even an entire article questioning the truth of his statements.

We had a President IMPEACHED for lying and he doesn't have an article about his lies.

If it doesn't show that there are two America's, one grounded in reality and one in "their truth", I don't know what could top it.

I hope history will correct this Era (error) of media malpractice.
Posted by Walkthedawg
Dawg Pound
Member since Oct 2012
11466 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 9:31 am to
Moderator, please delete this post!! We don't need this information as general knowledge.
Posted by Green Chili Tiger
Lurking the Tin Foil Hat Board
Member since Jul 2009
47603 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 9:35 am to
quote:

deep seeded


This isn't a thing
Posted by NikolaiJakov
Moscow
Member since Mar 2014
2803 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 9:36 am to
quote:

This isn't a thing


Sorry. I had a real major, not English.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 9:39 am to
quote:

quote:

deep seeded
This isn't a thing
Stream of consciousness rants normally contain such gaffes.
Posted by Nado Jenkins83
Land of the Free
Member since Nov 2012
59644 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 9:39 am to
Watch mark dice on wiki. He will let you know the truth
Posted by BlackHelicopterPilot
Top secret lab
Member since Feb 2004
52833 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 9:40 am to
quote:

deep seeded


quote:

This isn't a thing



I've seen my dad naked. My mom WAS...at least 3 times
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
146700 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 9:41 am to
Go read Ben Rhodes wiki page; it is so obviously biased and barely touches his Iran deal/Havana deal failures, or failing a clearance scandals
Posted by Tactical1
Denham Springs
Member since May 2010
27104 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 9:44 am to
quote:

We had a President IMPEACHED for lying and he doesn't have an article about his lies.



You must be terrible at Wikipedia.

LINK
Posted by Navytiger74
Member since Oct 2009
50458 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 9:45 am to
quote:

There is even an entire article questioning the truth of his statements. We had a President IMPEACHED for lying and he doesn't have an article about his lies.
There's literally an article titled "The Impeachment of Bill Clinton," frothy. I didn't read it, but I bet it mentions some lies.

quote:

I hope history will correct this Era (error) of media malpractice.
Yeah. Hopefully history refers instead to the poliboard, Breitbart, Gateway Pundit, and Jacob Wohl for an accurate telling of things.
Posted by Green Chili Tiger
Lurking the Tin Foil Hat Board
Member since Jul 2009
47603 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 9:45 am to
quote:

I've seen my dad naked. My mom WAS...at least 3 times


Posted by TOSOV
Member since Jan 2016
8922 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 9:46 am to
Yeah I only use wikipedia to know where someone was born, their bdays/age, if they have any hot daughters that I can try to find nudes on reddit of, and basic objective info. The rest is pointless to depend on.

Bad thing is that it is what future gens will see as "legit" info. Which is why the left feel it needs to survive.

And no I wont donate...stop asking...and no I dont care if you can stay around.
Posted by Green Chili Tiger
Lurking the Tin Foil Hat Board
Member since Jul 2009
47603 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 9:47 am to
quote:

You must be terrible at Wikipedia.


He had a real major, not basic search skills.
Posted by doublecutter
Hear & Their
Member since Oct 2003
6579 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 9:49 am to
Go read the first paragraph on the Vidor, Texas Wikipedia page.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 9:50 am to
quote:

I hope history will correct this Era (error) of media malpractice.
Wikipedia is crowdsourced, my Slavic friend. Of course it is biased.

It is a decent starting point for any research topic, but it should NEVER be the only source.
This post was edited on 5/16/19 at 9:52 am
Posted by Eli Goldfinger
Member since Sep 2016
32785 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 9:52 am to
quote:

Sorry. I had a real major, not English.



Posted by TejasHorn
High Plains Driftin'
Member since Mar 2007
10922 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 9:53 am to
Wikipedia is a good source for a lot of things.

Politics is generally not one of them.
Posted by Navytiger74
Member since Oct 2009
50458 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 9:54 am to
quote:

I've seen my dad naked. My mom WAS...at least 3 times


Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
146700 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 9:55 am to
https://www.conservapedia.com/Examples_of_Bias_in_Wikipedia

Why is wikipedia the first hit in google searches?

No doubt they are biased, even reported as more so then the Britannica hard encyclopedias.

Wiki can be edited and progs are desperate and have nothing else.
Posted by Navytiger74
Member since Oct 2009
50458 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 9:57 am to
quote:

LINK Why is wikipedia the first hit in google searches? No doubt they are biased, even reported as more so then the Britannica hard encyclopedias. Wiki can be edited and progs are desperate and have nothing else.


Muh user-driven Wiki bias, waaah.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram