- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The white evangelical march toward climate disaster
Posted on 10/5/23 at 9:44 pm to JJJimmyJimJames
Posted on 10/5/23 at 9:44 pm to JJJimmyJimJames
quote:
besides you know your intended point was manmade "acceleration"
Why lie?
quote:
I think my previous posts in this thread speak for themselves. There are scientists that I respect that are skeptic about some of the data collection techniques and some that acknowledge the issue but are not convinced of the time table or severity of the potential consequences. Your unhinged response does nothing to convince anyone to take you seriously. So if that is your goal... you failed miserably. Would you like to try again?
Let's start with the sun. Would nt there need to be an increase in the suns energy output since the 70's to account for the warming observed? We def see the increase around the end of the 1800s and mid 1900s due to increase sunspot activity. But no net increase since mid 20th century. So how does that work?
Now let's say the sun's energy output had indeed increased Wouldnt we see all layers of the atmosphere warming?...rather than warming in the lower atmosphere and cooling in the upper?
This post was edited on 10/5/23 at 9:46 pm
1
Posted on 10/5/23 at 10:04 pm to ThuperThumpin
Again, you are displaying horse schidt.
I worked in NASAs Physics Lab around some of the leading experts on climate and know when a charlatan speaks.
The sun is believed to have variations of 11, approx 25, and approx 300 years among cycles the ones we currently know.
The variations of planets climates are all dependent on the star at their star system - solar system as we call it.
Some points of business.
1. I was not "spouting" about marxism, It is the reason people take your argumentative ignorance tacks..
2.My response was not the least 'unhinged'. Every single bit of it is informed and knowledgeable.
That is two strikes and counting. Those two descriptors designed to denigrate me standing against your marxism.
You intentionally lied about the "acceleration" of changes of temperatures - and then acted as though you werent implying 'man made' like every marxist in every, well, uh, "unhinged spouting" of man made climate change disaster nonsense.
You just lied, then acted as though you didnt.
and BTW, all those planets in the solar system are experiencing the same changes at the same times. Not fossil fuel engines, power production... It is the star, and EVERY PLANETARY BODY is experiencing change in the climate - not what you marxist power grabbers imply that it is...
a vastly bigger problem that you want to bring on.
Horse schidt - and yes I noticed you keep weaseling into trying your nonsense.. maybe you are unhinged in a subtle sort of way
I worked in NASAs Physics Lab around some of the leading experts on climate and know when a charlatan speaks.
The sun is believed to have variations of 11, approx 25, and approx 300 years among cycles the ones we currently know.
The variations of planets climates are all dependent on the star at their star system - solar system as we call it.
quote:ever hear of a closed loop. Water vapor, ocean currents, ice ages, high temp eons, volcanos underwater and of the dust veil variety, a million other inputs... that did what the planetary system has done since before life was on the planet. But the horse schidt claims of "well, we need to curtail weatern civilization..." bleh bleh bleh Heil Horseschidt
So how does that work?
Some points of business.
1. I was not "spouting" about marxism, It is the reason people take your argumentative ignorance tacks..
2.My response was not the least 'unhinged'. Every single bit of it is informed and knowledgeable.
That is two strikes and counting. Those two descriptors designed to denigrate me standing against your marxism.
You intentionally lied about the "acceleration" of changes of temperatures - and then acted as though you werent implying 'man made' like every marxist in every, well, uh, "unhinged spouting" of man made climate change disaster nonsense.
You just lied, then acted as though you didnt.
and BTW, all those planets in the solar system are experiencing the same changes at the same times. Not fossil fuel engines, power production... It is the star, and EVERY PLANETARY BODY is experiencing change in the climate - not what you marxist power grabbers imply that it is...
a vastly bigger problem that you want to bring on.
Horse schidt - and yes I noticed you keep weaseling into trying your nonsense.. maybe you are unhinged in a subtle sort of way
This post was edited on 10/5/23 at 10:19 pm
Posted on 10/5/23 at 10:23 pm to JJJimmyJimJames
You didn't answer my questions. I didn't work in a physics lab. I got my info straight from climate.gov. If you would like to show me how full of shite they are would you mind answering my questions like I'm 5. And a closed loop isn't an answer. Accelerated warming would mean detectectible higher energy output right or no?
And if you are gonna accuse independents like myself of getting into bed with marxist and being a marxist when my position on this subject is fairly neutral and in fact opposed to the cutting of fossil fuel production....then buddy you are terrible at being anti marxist. I would change tactics and take folks at their word if you want to make allies.
And if you are gonna accuse independents like myself of getting into bed with marxist and being a marxist when my position on this subject is fairly neutral and in fact opposed to the cutting of fossil fuel production....then buddy you are terrible at being anti marxist. I would change tactics and take folks at their word if you want to make allies.
This post was edited on 10/5/23 at 10:35 pm
Posted on 10/5/23 at 10:31 pm to JJJimmyJimJames
quote:
I worked in NASAs Physics Lab around some of the leading experts on climate and know when a charlatan speaks.
After they left at night and you were emptying the trash cans, did you sometimes finish their unsolved equations?
Posted on 10/5/23 at 11:38 pm to djmed
I believe in the God who controls the climate
Posted on 10/6/23 at 7:37 am to Esquire
quote:No. But my published work is in libraries around the world.
After they left at night and you were emptying the trash cans, did you sometimes finish their unsolved equations?
Posted on 10/6/23 at 7:45 am to djmed
TLDR - White evangelicals know the left is completely and utterly full of shite. So they now get the blame for the boogeyman to come.
Posted on 10/6/23 at 7:58 am to JJJimmyJimJames
quote:
No. But my published work is in libraries around the world.
Is your best friend Ben Affleck?
Posted on 10/6/23 at 8:03 am to Esquire
quote:The question for you is 'will you always be a petty little man nipping at others ankles'?
quote:
No. But my published work is in libraries around the world.
Is your best friend Ben Affleck?
Posted on 10/6/23 at 8:24 am to JJJimmyJimJames
Ok Matt Damon
Posted on 10/6/23 at 8:26 am to JJJimmyJimJames
Yes you will.
Posted on 10/6/23 at 8:26 am to JJJimmyJimJames
quote:
The question for you is 'will you always be a petty little man nipping at others ankles'?
Its a common theme with stalkers so dont ever expect it to stop.
Especially when they are 50 still living in their parents basement
Posted on 10/6/23 at 8:27 am to SDVTiger
quote:
SDVTiger
Posted on 10/6/23 at 8:30 am to ThuperThumpin
quote:This paragraph is non sequiturs out the azz...
You didn't answer my questions. I didn't work in a physics lab. I got my info straight from climate.gov. If you would like to show me how full of shite they are would you mind answering my questions like I'm 5. And a closed loop isn't an answer. Accelerated warming would mean detectectible higher energy output right or no?
sorry you were not taught how to think
Posted on 10/6/23 at 8:32 am to SDVTiger
quote:
Its a common theme with stalkers so dont ever expect it to stop. Especially when they are 50 still living in their parents basement
Nobody asked for your autobiography Cobra Tate.
Posted on 10/6/23 at 8:37 am to djmed
"LIBS BE SMART, NORMIES BE STOOPID!
Posted on 10/6/23 at 8:39 am to jrobic4
quote:heh heh
"LIBS BE SMART, NORMIES BE STOOPID!
Posted on 10/6/23 at 8:41 am to djmed
quote:
among white evangelicals it has dropped 38%.
That's what happens when you push a hoax as a crisis that requires massive funding to nowhere but the pockets of paid alarmists fabricating "science".
Posted on 10/6/23 at 9:19 am to JJJimmyJimJames
quote:
This paragraph is non sequiturs out the azz...
sorry you were not taught how to think
If you fully understood how the sun effects the climate you would have no issue answering my questions. I'm begging you to walk me though and show me how the official government line on the topic is wrong and you wont or cant. I do actually interact with scientists everyday and was raised by one. They cant shut up if someone shows even the slightest hint of interest in a topic that they are knowledgeable about.
This post was edited on 10/6/23 at 9:28 am
Posted on 10/6/23 at 9:26 am to Powerman
quote:When religions get the power to regulate, tax and jail people this wil be a valid equivalency. Until then it’s just silly.
You act as if religion isn't equally as terrible about this
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News