- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The Week of The SCOTUS Decisions
Posted on 7/9/22 at 10:08 pm to MJackson
Posted on 7/9/22 at 10:08 pm to MJackson
This was my mantra when he got elected. Ha did way more than I expected but I said if he gets the Court set up right, I might make it to the end of my life with minimal damage. Biden is taking my 401K however
0
Posted on 7/9/22 at 10:10 pm to LSU82BILL
Yeah, but they were voted on and ratified by congress and then signed into law by the president, so they should be interpreted just as the constitution is. The original wording and context is just as important in amendments as it is in the constitution. If and when those amendments are deemed to be detrimental to the People, it’s the legislative branch’s job to change them with the help of the executive branch. The judicial branch just enforces the will of the people by interpreting the law in its original context. Make sense?
Posted on 7/9/22 at 10:39 pm to arktiger28
quote:
Scalia called Thomas a blood thirsty originalist
"But he's not cause he'd agree to forcing people to have photo IDs, and there were no cameras at the time of the Constitution. Also, 1A shouldn't cover internet chats cause internets wasn't around them either. So therefore, he isn't an orginalist sticking to what it says. So if those are in the constitution then abortion is too"
-leftie told me this
This post was edited on 7/9/22 at 10:43 pm
Posted on 7/10/22 at 9:37 am to LSU82BILL
quote:
The right to keep in bear arms isn’t in there.
It wasn't there because it is a natural right. The natural right, inalienable is often used, to protect yourself and your loved ones is not given by a gooberment.
I can not wait for the 1934 Firearms Act to be overturned. It will be glorious.
Posted on 7/10/22 at 9:46 am to LSU82BILL
quote:
The right to keep in bear arms isn’t in there.
That isn't what allows us to own firearms.
But I do appreciate it when anti-gun zealots admit that the Constitution is the only thing stopping them from trying to disarm the population.
Posted on 7/10/22 at 9:47 am to Timeoday
quote:
I can not wait for the 1934 Firearms Act to be overturned. It will be glorious.
What makes you believe this will happen?
Posted on 7/10/22 at 9:53 am to loogaroo
quote:
What makes you believe this will happen?
NYSRPA v. Bruen
Posted on 7/10/22 at 11:17 am to DisplacedBuckeye
Ditto!! After they dismantle the 1934 Firearms Act, I pray the Commerce Clause finds the trash heap!!
Posted on 7/10/22 at 11:50 am to LSU82BILL
quote:If you want the board to recognize an informed opinion, say goodbye to that with this post.
If you want the court to recognize the original constitution then say goodbye to your guns
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News