- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 12/9/22 at 5:59 pm to rt3
quote:
Matt Taibbi @mtaibbi
21. Roth’s report to FBI/DHS/DNI is almost farcical in its self-flagellating tone:
“We blocked the NYP story, then unblocked it (but said the opposite)… comms is angry, reporters think we’re idiots… in short, FML” (frick my life).
Posted on 12/9/22 at 6:00 pm to Proximo
quote:
was unconstitutional because it was the government acting via intermediary. It’s not about twitter itself
I haven't seen that in the tweets yet.
I agree it's all shady and what not but still waiting on that boom government telling Twitter to suppress this person. Or really much of any government direction other than vague warnings en policing stuff.
Posted on 12/9/22 at 6:01 pm to oklahogjr
Lol. Psycho.
Posted on 12/9/22 at 6:01 pm to rt3
I don't see 22??
quote:
Matt Taibbi @mtaibbi
23. Some of Roth’s later Slacks indicate his weekly confabs with federal law enforcement involved separate meetings. Here, he ghosts the FBI and DHS, respectively, to go first to an “Aspen Institute thing,” then take a call with Apple.
Posted on 12/9/22 at 6:03 pm to rt3
HERE IS THE FBI ASKING TWITTER TO DELETE THE POST OF A GOP POLITICIAN WHO WAS QUESTIONING MAIL BALLOTS BEING REJECTED
quote:
Matt Taibbi @mtaibbi
24. Here, the FBI sends reports about a pair of tweets, the second of which involves a former Tippecanoe County, Indiana Councilor and Republican named @JohnBasham claiming “Between 2% and 25% of Ballots by Mail are Being Rejected for Errors.”
Posted on 12/9/22 at 6:03 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
Political officiation isn't protected i don't believe.
It is in several states.
Posted on 12/9/22 at 6:03 pm to rt3
quote:
I don't see 22??
He skipped it.
Posted on 12/9/22 at 6:04 pm to rt3
quote:
I don't see 22??
Not on mine either.
May have missed one or just missed the number
Posted on 12/9/22 at 6:04 pm to rt3
quote:
Matt Taibbi @mtaibbi
The FBI's second report concerned this tweet by @JohnBasham:
Posted on 12/9/22 at 6:04 pm to rt3
Posted on 12/9/22 at 6:06 pm to Bobby OG Johnson
I wish Elon would do a deep dive into 2016...surely there's some files describing twitter either
1) attempting this same shite,
2) doing this on a smaller scale and failing
3) messages saying "we won't make this mistake again!"
1) attempting this same shite,
2) doing this on a smaller scale and failing
3) messages saying "we won't make this mistake again!"
This post was edited on 12/9/22 at 6:07 pm
Posted on 12/9/22 at 6:06 pm to Runner1
quote:
Like me or not. I do not care. I’d love for the whole bunch to go to prison but it will take more than what has come out to give anyone time. I pray for a smoking gun but it’s not happened yet.
There's plenty there to get the government, and twitter employees - once they started their association with the government, they ARE the government for this purpose.
Posted on 12/9/22 at 6:06 pm to rt3
quote:
Matt Taibbi @mtaibbi
25. The FBI-flagged tweet then got circulated in the enforcement Slack. Twitter cited Politifact to say the first story was “proven to be false,” then noted the second was already deemed “no vio on numerous occasions.”
Posted on 12/9/22 at 6:07 pm to rt3
quote:
Matt Taibbi @mtaibbi
26. The group then decides to apply a “Learn how voting is safe and secure” label because one commenter says, “it’s totally normal to have a 2% error rate.” Roth then gives the final go-ahead to the process initiated by the FBI:
Posted on 12/9/22 at 6:07 pm to rt3
quote:
Matt Taibbi @mtaibbi
27. Examining the entire election enforcement Slack, we didn’t see one reference to moderation requests from the Trump campaign, the Trump White House, or Republicans generally. We looked. They may exist: we were told they do. However, they were absent here.
Posted on 12/9/22 at 6:10 pm to BBONDS25
It's not odd at all for private companies to work with regulators in order to follow the law. Banks, O&G companies, food and dairy companies, etc. do it all the time. It's a common practice.
But what are the regulations surrounding social media and who is the regulatory authority?
Did the FBI and DHS just appoint themselves as the social media authorities and did they just make up rules on the fly?
But what are the regulations surrounding social media and who is the regulatory authority?
Did the FBI and DHS just appoint themselves as the social media authorities and did they just make up rules on the fly?
Posted on 12/9/22 at 6:10 pm to 19
...and even if they didn't do it in 2016, were they approached with a request to do it from DNC genderfroots?
and if so, did twitter refuse?
if yes, then what was their basis for refusing-(1A??!)
if so, WTF changed in 2020?
and if so, did twitter refuse?
if yes, then what was their basis for refusing-(1A??!)
if so, WTF changed in 2020?
Posted on 12/9/22 at 6:10 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
haven't seen that in the tweets yet.
bullshite…these tweets show open collusion between the FBI and Twitter to censor political opposition.
Take off the partisan blinders and see this for what it clearly is
Posted on 12/9/22 at 6:11 pm to rt3
no 28, 29, or 30??
quote:
Matt Taibbi @mtaibbi
31. In one case, former Arizona governor Mike Huckabee joke-tweets about mailing in ballots for his “deceased parents and grandparents.”
Page 4 of 15
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News