- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The Twitter Files: TRUMP edition and Part 4 (Part 5 tonight)
Posted on 12/9/22 at 5:30 pm to themunch
Posted on 12/9/22 at 5:30 pm to themunch
quote:
Matt Taibbi @mtaibbi
9. Before J6, Twitter was a unique mix of automated, rules-based enforcement, and more subjective moderation by senior executives. As @BariWeiss reported, the firm had a vast array of tools for manipulating visibility, most all of which were thrown at Trump (and others) pre-J6.
Posted on 12/9/22 at 5:32 pm to rt3
quote:
Matt Taibbi @mtaibbi
10. As the election approached, senior executives – perhaps under pressure from federal agencies, with whom they met more as time progressed – increasingly struggled with rules, and began to speak of “vios” as pretexts to do what they’d likely have done anyway.
Posted on 12/9/22 at 5:34 pm to rt3
So it seems like they tried to ride their rules. Is it illegal for them to apply rules to one person but not for others? I feel like that’s a big no no.
Posted on 12/9/22 at 5:35 pm to rt3
quote:
the firm had a vast array of tools for manipulating visibility, most all of which were thrown at Trump (and others) pre-J6.
Election interfering
Wonder what his real follower count should have been?
Also explains their blatant amplification of left wing responses on any of his tweets
Posted on 12/9/22 at 5:37 pm to Bobby OG Johnson
quote:
Matt Taibbi @mtaibbi
11. After J6, internal Slacks show Twitter executives getting a kick out of intensified relationships with federal agencies. Here’s Trust and Safety head Yoel Roth, lamenting a lack of “generic enough” calendar descriptions to concealing his “very interesting” meeting partners.
Posted on 12/9/22 at 5:38 pm to rt3
Yoel Roth was giddy to do the FBI's bidding against Trump
Posted on 12/9/22 at 5:39 pm to rt3
quote:
Matt Taibbi @mtaibbi
12. These initial reports are based on searches for docs linked to prominent executives, whose names are already public. They include Roth, former trust and policy chief Vijaya Gadde, and recently plank-walked Deputy General Counsel (and former top FBI lawyer) Jim Baker.
Posted on 12/9/22 at 5:39 pm to rt3
quote:
Matt Taibbi @mtaibbi
13. One particular slack channel offers an unique window into the evolving thinking of top officials in late 2020 and early 2021.
Posted on 12/9/22 at 5:42 pm to rt3
quote:
Matt Taibbi @mtaibbi
14. On October 8th, 2020, executives opened a channel called “us2020_xfn_enforcement.” Through J6, this would be home for discussions about election-related removals, especially ones that involved “high-profile” accounts (often called “VITs” or “Very Important Tweeters”).
Posted on 12/9/22 at 5:43 pm to Proximo
This is why I'm sending a message to Joe Rogan, asking that he reconsider his decision to not have Trump on the podcast.
This is an historical time we're living in - whether or not you support Trump, you can't ignore him. The information we could get from 3hrs of Trump could be very valuable about the state of our nation right now.
This is an historical time we're living in - whether or not you support Trump, you can't ignore him. The information we could get from 3hrs of Trump could be very valuable about the state of our nation right now.
Posted on 12/9/22 at 5:43 pm to rt3
quote:
Matt Taibbi @mtaibbi
15. There was at least some tension between Safety Operations – a larger department whose staffers used a more rules-based process for addressing issues like porn, scams, and threats – and a smaller, more powerful cadre of senior policy execs like Roth and Gadde.
Posted on 12/9/22 at 5:43 pm to rt3
Through all this I see a nothing burger unless they implicate a crime for a federal agency. Even the higher up the execs can and will argue they were within boundaries of their rules to do so. Meh. Private Company.
Posted on 12/9/22 at 5:46 pm to Runner1
I can’t stand people like you. The federal government was actively meeting with one of the biggest tech companies in the world to direct them to silence political opposition, yet you come in here without reading a word and say,
“Nothing burger”
Such an intellectual
“Nothing burger”
Such an intellectual
Posted on 12/9/22 at 5:46 pm to POTUS2024
quote:
This is why I'm sending a message to Joe Rogan, asking that he reconsider his decision to not have Trump on the podcast.
This is an historical time we're living in - whether or not you support Trump, you can't ignore him. The information we could get from 3hrs of Trump could be very valuable about the state of our nation right now.
Would be amazing because Rogan would ask unbiased regular guy questions...an informed regular guy. The problem with corporate media is they ask only approved questions.
This post was edited on 12/9/22 at 5:48 pm
Posted on 12/9/22 at 5:47 pm to Proximo
quote:
I can’t stand people like you. The federal government was actively meeting with one of the biggest tech companies in the world to direct them to silence political opposition, yet you come in here without reading a word and say,
“Nothing burger”
Such an intellectual
also... remember... this is part 1 of 3 parts on the banning of Trump
so this is the set up
Posted on 12/9/22 at 5:48 pm to GumboPot
quote:
Matt Taibbi @mtaibbi
16. The latter group were a high-speed Supreme Court of moderation, issuing content rulings on the fly, often in minutes and based on guesses, gut calls, even Google searches, even in cases involving the President.
This post was edited on 12/9/22 at 5:48 pm
Posted on 12/9/22 at 5:48 pm to rt3
quote:
Matt Taibbi @mtaibbi
17. During this time, executives were also clearly liaising with federal enforcement and intelligence agencies about moderation of election-related content. While we’re still at the start of reviewing the #TwitterFiles, we’re finding out more about these interactions every day.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News