- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The reaction to these the new tariff policies of DJT defies logic and common sense.
Posted on 3/13/25 at 9:48 am to RogerTheShrubber
Posted on 3/13/25 at 9:48 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Not interfere with trade between two private parties.
But it's okay when every other country does just that, making our products too expensive to compete in their countries. Right.
Posted on 3/13/25 at 9:50 am to troyt37
quote:
But it's okay when every other country does just that,
Its their loss. Thats why their people are poor.
Posted on 3/13/25 at 10:07 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Its their loss. Thats why their people are poor.
No dingus, it is also the loss of the company trying to do business with them, which is their purpose for the tariffs in the first place. They protect their own businesses, making our product uncompetitive with their domestic products. The fact that they rake in billions doing so speaks to our quality, and their consumer's demand for our products.
Posted on 3/13/25 at 10:09 am to troyt37
quote:
No dingus, it is also the loss of the company trying to do business with them,
Who buys the product?
Posted on 3/13/25 at 10:15 am to Eurocat
quote:MoAr moratoriums on fracking!
I have no idea what that attempt at philosophy was supposed to be.
The fact is, people think tarrifs, higher prices for my Lowenbrau beer (that might be a bit of a lighthearted thing but not in NY which gets its power from Canada).
LeSs permits in the name of climate change!
Posted on 3/13/25 at 10:17 am to RogerTheShrubber
Those who can afford the product, plus the price that gets added because of the tariff imposed. Meaning that less off the product is bought, maybe none of the product is bought, because domestic product is cheaper. I’m not here to answer your inane questions. If you don’t have at least an elementary understanding of tariffs, I suggest you educate yourself.
Posted on 3/13/25 at 10:18 am to troyt37
quote:
Meaning that less off the product is bought
Consumers get railed, importers get railed.
Do you know who it helps? Politicians, and no one else.
This is the economic strategy you people want to immulate.
Posted on 3/13/25 at 10:19 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Who buys the product?
Nobody because the product is too expensive once their gov. puts the tariffs on our product.
This post was edited on 3/13/25 at 10:22 am
Posted on 3/13/25 at 10:21 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Consumers get railed, importers get railed.
Do you know who it helps? Politicians, and no one else.
This is the economic strategy you people want to immulate.
Want to know how to stop the railing?
Posted on 3/13/25 at 10:21 am to TenWheelsForJesus
quote:
No one is complaining because "the rich aren't paying enough."
Then tell me why you think it's o.k. for some people to be exempt from income taxes while other people still have to pay them? Why is that a good thing?
quote:
The fact that you think you have the right to tell others what they should incorrectly think just proves you don't understand the "populism" you hate.
The fact that you don't understand the difference in pointing out self-contradictory logic and telling someone what to think means you are a moron. But we already knew that.
quote:
Lower taxes for the middle class.
But no one was proposing lowering taxes for the middle class. The proposal was for singling out a few very specific groups to exempt, some of whom might be in the middle class, some of whom might be in the lower class, and some of whom (SS recipients) might be deca-millionaires.
You know what lowering taxes in the middle class also does? Widens our national deficit and debt.
I'm fine with the lowest taxes possible. As long as they are equally applied. And as long as they are responsible. We owe over $36 Trilion. We can't afford tax exemptions ever, but we can't even afford legitimate tax cuts until that comes down and we at least have a balanced budget. And no, DOGE will not balance the budget.
quote:
There's never any compromise for you, even when it results in the status quo you claim to not like.
What is your definition of the word "compromise?" Because I suspect what you mean by it isn't really the definition of the word applied to public policy.
quote:
Tariffs will strengthen our manufacturing base and bring jobs to families that can give them extra money to buy a home and help build a strong future. "I don't care. I only want cheaper crap."
No, moron, the objection is that bringing manufacturing back to America will raise prices for those families you just shed all those crocodile tears for.
I've posted this 100 times here (probably at least a dozen times directly to you) and you populists apparently can't read, but here it is again...
If we were to recover every single manufacturing job we supposedly "lost" overseas and then doubled it, we'd be talking about an an absolute maximum of 20 million jobs. Those are real (if generous) numbers. I looked them up.
The average factory worker in America makes a little over $17 an hour. I looked that up too.
The average Chinese factory worker makes a little over $6 an hour. Yep, looked it up.
So for 6% of the American population to have—on average—a $17 an hour job opportunity that doesn't currently exist here, you want prices to go up as significantly as they would go up if manufacturing labor costs almost tripled, and those increased costs would apply to 100% of the American population, including the 20 million $17 an hour workers that are supposed to be the big winners here.
quote:
You people live in a dreamland
For sure, one of us does. Math has a way of revealing which one.
Posted on 3/13/25 at 10:24 am to Warboo
quote:
Who buys the product?
Nobody
Posted on 3/13/25 at 10:24 am to troyt37
quote:
Everything above is horseshite.
Yeah, well, so is populism in general (see the guy above I just replied to).
But that is the way of the world in 2025.
It doesn't matter if it's true. It only matters if populists believe it.
Posted on 3/13/25 at 10:26 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Consumers get railed, importers get railed.
Do you know who it helps? Politicians, and no one else.
This is the economic strategy you people want to immulate.
We aren't trying to emulate them, we are trying to educate them. Yes the consumers get railed, yes the importers get railed, and yes the producer in the home country gets railed too. But the railing has been one sided, as evidenced by a country of 350 million having a 70 billion dollar trade deficit with a country of 40 million. How that is not understandable to you, baffles me.
Posted on 3/13/25 at 10:28 am to troyt37
quote:
We aren't trying to emulate them,
Posted on 3/13/25 at 10:33 am to troyt37
quote:
But it's okay when every other country does just that, making our products too expensive to compete in their countries.
Sure, that hurts American producers.
But Trump imposing tariffs hurts American consumers.
Which do you think there are more of in America?
Look, I always say that if Trump can force free trade out of this, great. That's best case scenario. I have serious doubts that he actually can, but if he can, great for American producers. Free trade is the best for both American producers and consumers.
But all the other reasons y'all populists give suck and need to be ignored.
So now we're down to whether it is worth the gamble to do something you know is going to hurt the American economy to try to force free trade.
I genuinely don't know the answer to that. It might be, only time will tell. But everyone needs to go into this knowing that:
1. This is a choice. We're choosing this battle. We do not have to do this.
2. It could fail. And if it does, it will hurt the economy. It will hurt the economy even if it succeeds, but there will ostensibly be a period of recoupment after the period of pain. But...
3. If the next POTUS is just about anybody other than J.D. Vance, it could be reversed overnight. So all the pain might be for nothing ultimately.
You've got to keep that in mind when deciding whether or not you think the risk is worth the reward.
Posted on 3/13/25 at 10:39 am to RogerTheShrubber
You've convinced me. You're an idiot with a terminal case of TDS.
Canada and Europe going apoplectic about US tariffs tells me that they have suddenly realized that tariffs are bullshite, and hurt everyone involved. They and you are still apparently stuck in the pissed off (finding out) stage of this whole affair. At some point, someone with brains in those countries is going to say, "if tariffs are bullshite, and hurt everyone involved, why have WE been going ham on tariffs for decades?"
Canada and Europe going apoplectic about US tariffs tells me that they have suddenly realized that tariffs are bullshite, and hurt everyone involved. They and you are still apparently stuck in the pissed off (finding out) stage of this whole affair. At some point, someone with brains in those countries is going to say, "if tariffs are bullshite, and hurt everyone involved, why have WE been going ham on tariffs for decades?"
Posted on 3/13/25 at 10:40 am to troyt37
quote:
Canada and Europe going apoplectic about US tariffs
Tell me how much you love their economies. Why they are the bastion of opportinity why we're over here getting fricked and rotting away.
Go for it, I'd love to hear your fairy tale.
Posted on 3/13/25 at 10:45 am to wackatimesthree
quote:
Look, I always say that if Trump can force free trade out of this, great. That's best case scenario. I have serious doubts that he actually can, but if he can, great for American producers. Free trade is the best for both American producers and consumers.
One thing is for certain. We aren't going to force free trade by allowing ourselves to be buttfricked by every country who wants to do so.
Posted on 3/13/25 at 11:02 am to RogerTheShrubber
I think you might be cracking up. I don't want to put you over the edge. The EU is a market larger than the US in population. The prospect of opening those markets to US producers for fair trade would be the single best thing to happen to the economy in decades, probably centuries.
What is preventing that are protectionist tariffs imposed by the EU and Canada. The very people who live by tariffs want the US to understand that tariffs are bad. What Trump is doing is trying to get them to understand just how bad they are, and why they should stop imposing them on our producers.
To this point, all these foreign countries were just fine with tariffs, as long as they were the ones imposing them. We are now at the find out portion, where they realize that tariffs are bullshite, and they aren't taking the news so well.
What is preventing that are protectionist tariffs imposed by the EU and Canada. The very people who live by tariffs want the US to understand that tariffs are bad. What Trump is doing is trying to get them to understand just how bad they are, and why they should stop imposing them on our producers.
To this point, all these foreign countries were just fine with tariffs, as long as they were the ones imposing them. We are now at the find out portion, where they realize that tariffs are bullshite, and they aren't taking the news so well.
Posted on 3/13/25 at 11:04 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Tell me how much you love their economies. Why they are the bastion of opportinity why we're over here getting fricked and rotting away.
So we should continue to let them levy tariffs on us but we shouldn't levy any on them? What is your actual stance? No disagreeing just trying to see exactly where you stand.
Popular
Back to top



2


