re: The Official Honest Bob clown show hearing thread

The greatest obstruction against a President of ALL-TIME

Ratcliffe: "Can you give me an example other than Donald Trump where the Justice Department determined that an investigated person was not exonerated because their innocence was not conclusively determined?"
Mueller: "I cannot, but this is a unique situation."
Ratcliffe: "You can’t...because I’ll tell you why. It doesn’t exist. The Special Counsel’s job, nowhere does it say that you were to conclusively determine Donald Trump’s innocence or that the Special Counsel report should determine whether or not to exonerate him. It’s not in any of the documents, it’s not in your appointment order, it’s not in the Special Counsel regulations, it’s not in the OLC Opinions, it’s not in the Justice manual, and it’s not in the Principles of Federal Prosecution...it was not the Special Counsel’s job to conclusively determine Donald Trump’s innocence or to exonerate him. Because the bedrock principle of our justice system is a presumption of innocence...You wrote 180 pages, 180 pages about decisions that weren’t reached, about potential crimes that weren’t charged or decided. And respectfully, respectfully, by doing that, you managed to violate every principle and the most sacred of traditions about prosecutors not offering extra prosecutorial analysis about potential crimes that aren’t charged...I agree with the Chairman this morning when he said Donald Trump is not above the law. He’s not, but he DAMN sure shouldn’t be below the law, which is where volume two of this report puts him.

THE NARRATIVE IS DEAD

quote:

---

But Mueller didn’t recommend indictment because you can’t indict a sitti...

---

You do realize That Mueller recanted that statement right before the second hearing, right?

And, I'll tell you why he recanted. Muller got a call or message from AG Barr telling him that he better recant or he was gonna be subject to an indictment on perjury charges because he told Barr several times that the decision not to indict had nothing to do with the fact that Trump was a sitting president and Barr had witnesses.

He grabbed it, didn't he?

How long is this thread going to be stickied? Now it's like having a dead body hanging by a meat hook in the town sqaure for the public to gawk at.