Started By
Message

re: The most 'just' and 'moral' war in all of history

Posted on 4/3/19 at 1:07 pm to
Posted by The Pirate King
Pangu
Member since May 2014
68435 posts
Posted on 4/3/19 at 1:07 pm to
What do you define as just and moral? History is written by the victors
Posted by Ancient Astronaut
Member since May 2015
37333 posts
Posted on 4/3/19 at 1:08 pm to
Most Russians didn’t give a shite about the Russian revolution.
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 4/3/19 at 1:09 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 5/26/23 at 3:34 pm
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39820 posts
Posted on 4/3/19 at 1:13 pm to
quote:

Perhaps not every christian they ran across but how about the Armenians? Granted it was late in the empire but they did try to kill all the Armenians in 1915.



That was primarily due to Turkish nationalism. The Ottoman administration was fairly cosmopolitan (made up of Albanians, Bosnians, Turks, Greeks, Turkmens and other ethnic groups), but that cosmopolitanism caused a backlash, once ethnonationalisti ideas surfaced in the empire, after their introduction from Europe. The 1880's onward saw more persecution of non-Turks, but the persecution and mistreatment took different forms depending on the religion. Ottoman rulers wanted a cosmopolitan empire, and introduced a standardization of dress for officials, including the fez, which also became a symbol of orientalism.
Posted by NYNolaguy1
Member since May 2011
21764 posts
Posted on 4/3/19 at 1:14 pm to
At least in the ETO, WW2 can easily be summarized by a war of idealogy: fascism (Italy, Spain, Germany, Austria, Romania) vs Communism (eastern bloc, Russia) vs democracy (UK, US, France, Poland, etc).
Posted by TigerFanInSouthland
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2012
28065 posts
Posted on 4/3/19 at 1:14 pm to
quote:

i think the world would be a better place had the united states joined with the axis powers


I wouldn’t go that far, but as you said, neutrality would’ve made for the best outcome in Europe for sure. Judging by what Europe has turned into and knowing what we know now.

I say that as Europe would not have lost its identity and its culture as it has since then with the onslaught of cultural Marxism and Moslems.
This post was edited on 4/3/19 at 1:21 pm
Posted by jrodLSUke
Premium
Member since Jan 2011
26273 posts
Posted on 4/3/19 at 1:15 pm to
The war against straight white men - Democrats

The war against Christians - Democrats

The war against capitalism - Democrats

The war against small businesses owners - Democrats

The war against legal immigration - Democrats

The war against truthful investigative journalism- Democrats

The war to end all wars against Trump - Democrats
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39820 posts
Posted on 4/3/19 at 1:18 pm to
quote:


The Crusades were launched in response to Muslim aggressions.


While true, it's complicated. The Romans and the Byzantines had been fighting in West Asia, at their eastern frontier, since the year 200. Their enemy changed from Persians to Arabs, but the Byzantines, by the year 1000, were fairly content to fight against Arabs. The newly converted Turks moved from Central Asia into West Asia, colonizing parts of Asia Minor, becoming more powerful than the Arabs in the region eventually. This new enemy is what drove Alexios to send envoys to Pope Urban, as the Seljuq Turks represented a new threat to the Byzantines.
Posted by volod
Leesville, LA
Member since Jun 2014
5392 posts
Posted on 4/3/19 at 1:22 pm to
quote:

you're one of the tens of millions who died under stalin or mao or the other communist dictators, do you think the good guys won in world war 2? probably not.


To be fair, Chinas fall into Communism wasnt completely the fault of Russia. Read about the Boxer Rebellion and the Opium Wars. The stage was already set for overthrowing the current government before Stalin came of power.
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 4/3/19 at 1:27 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 5/26/23 at 3:34 pm
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
117583 posts
Posted on 4/3/19 at 1:40 pm to
quote:

"Just" and "moral" are two words I would NOT use to describe the Russian Revolution.


I see this kind of psychological projection today with leftists. They lie and cheat all the time so they call Republicans liars and cheaters. The USSR had a terrific national anthem musically. But the words are all about 'land of the free'. The USSR was the opposite of freedom.
Posted by TigerFanInSouthland
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2012
28065 posts
Posted on 4/3/19 at 1:46 pm to
quote:

The USSR was the opposite of freedom.


Just started reading The Gulag Archipelago. Could not agree more. Should be mandatory reading for all high schoolers.
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
117583 posts
Posted on 4/3/19 at 1:48 pm to
quote:

Most Russians didn’t give a shite about the Russian revolution.


You should watch the movie Battleship Potemkin. It's from 1925, silent, and the first motion picture to use special effects. It's in Russian language but with English subtitles.
It says a lot about today's political discourse. It's the 'oppressors' vs. 'the oppressed.' It's 'rich vs. poor.' It's about the collective: 'One for all...All for one.'
Lots of women and children being slaughtered by the ruling class.
Posted by BlackHelicopterPilot
Top secret lab
Member since Feb 2004
52841 posts
Posted on 4/3/19 at 1:50 pm to
quote:

You should watch the movie Battleship Potemkin. It's from 1925, silent,


quote:

It's the 'oppressors' vs. 'the oppressed.' It's 'rich vs. poor.' It's about the collective: 'One for all...All for one.' Lots of women and children being slaughtered by the ruling class.



SPOLIERS, Dude!
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
117583 posts
Posted on 4/3/19 at 1:50 pm to
quote:

Just started reading The Gulag Archipelago. Could not agree more. Should be mandatory reading for all high schoolers.


Last month I tried to buy it on Kindle and it's not available. Too long for an e-reader?
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
117583 posts
Posted on 4/3/19 at 1:52 pm to
quote:

SPOLIERS, Dude!

Well, if you're gonna see a movie about the Civil War I'm not gonna tell you who won.
Posted by BlackHelicopterPilot
Top secret lab
Member since Feb 2004
52841 posts
Posted on 4/3/19 at 1:53 pm to
quote:

Well, if you're gonna see a movie about the Civil War I'm not gonna tell you who won.



Posted by TeLeFaWx
Dallas, TX
Member since Aug 2011
29311 posts
Posted on 4/3/19 at 1:53 pm to
The Cold War.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39820 posts
Posted on 4/3/19 at 1:59 pm to
quote:

Last month I tried to buy it on Kindle and it's not available. Too long for an e-reader?



Yeah. It's three volumes unabridged. There's a new volume out with a foreword by Jordan Peterson, but I don't know about the quality of the translation. The Thomas Whitney translation is superb though.
Posted by TigerFanInSouthland
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2012
28065 posts
Posted on 4/3/19 at 2:00 pm to
quote:

Last month I tried to buy it on Kindle and it's not available. Too long for an e-reader?


Well, it’s three volumes so idk why that would be the case. I, however, got the abridged edition.

Could be that it’s just amazon being amazon and simply not allowing a book that shines a poor light on socialism/communism and they don’t want to sell it on kindle.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram