- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 4/3/19 at 1:08 pm to Zach
Most Russians didn’t give a shite about the Russian revolution.
Posted on 4/3/19 at 1:09 pm to TigerFanInSouthland
(no message)
This post was edited on 5/26/23 at 3:34 pm
Posted on 4/3/19 at 1:13 pm to Toroballistic
quote:
Perhaps not every christian they ran across but how about the Armenians? Granted it was late in the empire but they did try to kill all the Armenians in 1915.
That was primarily due to Turkish nationalism. The Ottoman administration was fairly cosmopolitan (made up of Albanians, Bosnians, Turks, Greeks, Turkmens and other ethnic groups), but that cosmopolitanism caused a backlash, once ethnonationalisti ideas surfaced in the empire, after their introduction from Europe. The 1880's onward saw more persecution of non-Turks, but the persecution and mistreatment took different forms depending on the religion. Ottoman rulers wanted a cosmopolitan empire, and introduced a standardization of dress for officials, including the fez, which also became a symbol of orientalism.
Posted on 4/3/19 at 1:14 pm to DelU249
At least in the ETO, WW2 can easily be summarized by a war of idealogy: fascism (Italy, Spain, Germany, Austria, Romania) vs Communism (eastern bloc, Russia) vs democracy (UK, US, France, Poland, etc).
Posted on 4/3/19 at 1:14 pm to DelU249
quote:
i think the world would be a better place had the united states joined with the axis powers
I wouldn’t go that far, but as you said, neutrality would’ve made for the best outcome in Europe for sure. Judging by what Europe has turned into and knowing what we know now.
I say that as Europe would not have lost its identity and its culture as it has since then with the onslaught of cultural Marxism and Moslems.
This post was edited on 4/3/19 at 1:21 pm
Posted on 4/3/19 at 1:15 pm to Zach
The war against straight white men - Democrats
The war against Christians - Democrats
The war against capitalism - Democrats
The war against small businesses owners - Democrats
The war against legal immigration - Democrats
The war against truthful investigative journalism- Democrats
The war to end all wars against Trump - Democrats
The war against Christians - Democrats
The war against capitalism - Democrats
The war against small businesses owners - Democrats
The war against legal immigration - Democrats
The war against truthful investigative journalism- Democrats
The war to end all wars against Trump - Democrats
Posted on 4/3/19 at 1:18 pm to BlackAdam
quote:
The Crusades were launched in response to Muslim aggressions.
While true, it's complicated. The Romans and the Byzantines had been fighting in West Asia, at their eastern frontier, since the year 200. Their enemy changed from Persians to Arabs, but the Byzantines, by the year 1000, were fairly content to fight against Arabs. The newly converted Turks moved from Central Asia into West Asia, colonizing parts of Asia Minor, becoming more powerful than the Arabs in the region eventually. This new enemy is what drove Alexios to send envoys to Pope Urban, as the Seljuq Turks represented a new threat to the Byzantines.
Posted on 4/3/19 at 1:22 pm to DelU249
quote:
you're one of the tens of millions who died under stalin or mao or the other communist dictators, do you think the good guys won in world war 2? probably not.
To be fair, Chinas fall into Communism wasnt completely the fault of Russia. Read about the Boxer Rebellion and the Opium Wars. The stage was already set for overthrowing the current government before Stalin came of power.
Posted on 4/3/19 at 1:27 pm to volod
(no message)
This post was edited on 5/26/23 at 3:34 pm
Posted on 4/3/19 at 1:40 pm to Tchefuncte Tiger
quote:
"Just" and "moral" are two words I would NOT use to describe the Russian Revolution.
I see this kind of psychological projection today with leftists. They lie and cheat all the time so they call Republicans liars and cheaters. The USSR had a terrific national anthem musically. But the words are all about 'land of the free'. The USSR was the opposite of freedom.
Posted on 4/3/19 at 1:46 pm to Zach
quote:
The USSR was the opposite of freedom.
Just started reading The Gulag Archipelago. Could not agree more. Should be mandatory reading for all high schoolers.
Posted on 4/3/19 at 1:48 pm to Ancient Astronaut
quote:
Most Russians didn’t give a shite about the Russian revolution.
You should watch the movie Battleship Potemkin. It's from 1925, silent, and the first motion picture to use special effects. It's in Russian language but with English subtitles.
It says a lot about today's political discourse. It's the 'oppressors' vs. 'the oppressed.' It's 'rich vs. poor.' It's about the collective: 'One for all...All for one.'
Lots of women and children being slaughtered by the ruling class.
Posted on 4/3/19 at 1:50 pm to Zach
quote:
You should watch the movie Battleship Potemkin. It's from 1925, silent,
quote:
It's the 'oppressors' vs. 'the oppressed.' It's 'rich vs. poor.' It's about the collective: 'One for all...All for one.' Lots of women and children being slaughtered by the ruling class.
SPOLIERS, Dude!
Posted on 4/3/19 at 1:50 pm to TigerFanInSouthland
quote:
Just started reading The Gulag Archipelago. Could not agree more. Should be mandatory reading for all high schoolers.
Last month I tried to buy it on Kindle and it's not available. Too long for an e-reader?
Posted on 4/3/19 at 1:52 pm to BlackHelicopterPilot
quote:
SPOLIERS, Dude!
Posted on 4/3/19 at 1:53 pm to Zach
quote:
Well, if you're gonna see a movie about the Civil War I'm not gonna tell you who won.
Posted on 4/3/19 at 1:59 pm to Zach
quote:
Last month I tried to buy it on Kindle and it's not available. Too long for an e-reader?
Yeah. It's three volumes unabridged. There's a new volume out with a foreword by Jordan Peterson, but I don't know about the quality of the translation. The Thomas Whitney translation is superb though.
Posted on 4/3/19 at 2:00 pm to Zach
quote:
Last month I tried to buy it on Kindle and it's not available. Too long for an e-reader?
Well, it’s three volumes so idk why that would be the case. I, however, got the abridged edition.
Could be that it’s just amazon being amazon and simply not allowing a book that shines a poor light on socialism/communism and they don’t want to sell it on kindle.
Popular
Back to top



0






