- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 8/29/25 at 5:15 pm to SlowFlowPro
Well you just lied again so you’ve lost any leverage you had on sending me off to find more proof you’ll just lie about again. Nobody believes anything you say so you’re essentially just trying to convince yourself at this point.
Posted on 8/29/25 at 5:16 pm to Madking
quote:
Well you just lied again s
Posted on 8/29/25 at 5:17 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I don't.
You do.
"There is no such thing as lawfare"
Never once has this lawyer extraordinaire critiqued the endless activism on the federal benches by the left leaning and appointed judges and the resulting decisions that were clearly not based in constitutional law and quickly overturned.
Again, you are not gaslighting anyone.
Posted on 8/29/25 at 5:18 pm to hawgfaninc
Why do all these crazy fricks have a manifesto? That’s the fishy part for me.
Posted on 8/29/25 at 5:25 pm to kilo
quote:
Again, you are not gaslighting anyone.
This liberal dousch nozzle is not a lawyer. Ignore him.
Posted on 8/29/25 at 5:29 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
In terms of criminal, damn near. The nucleus of operative facts for a "fire in a theatre" scenario to become criminal to me is extremely rare. Now where we get into issues will be fraud, but fraud-based crimes must include other variables, too.
I've never considered fraud being a speech matter. What's an example where fraud becomes a speech issue -
Posted on 8/29/25 at 5:47 pm to kilo
quote:
"There is no such thing as lawfare"
Did I ever say this or did I ask people to define a malleable term?
quote:
Never once has this lawyer extraordinaire critiqued the endless activism on the federal benches
A lie
Posted on 8/29/25 at 5:48 pm to hogcard1964
quote:
This liberal dousch nozzle is not a lawyer.
Wrong 2x over, friend. Why do you lie?
Posted on 8/29/25 at 5:49 pm to David_DJS
quote:
What's an example where fraud becomes a speech issue -
I lie to you to gain some advantage.
Easy example is lie on a a home disclosure form to get a higher price.
Tell an old lady you're taking her vacuum order, take her deposit, and never return.
All of those things involve speech, but it's a lie, however the criminality requires the extra steps of the advantage.
Posted on 8/29/25 at 5:51 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Did I ever say this or did I ask people to define a malleable term?
Yes, you sure did
quote:
A lie
Show your work.
Posted on 8/29/25 at 5:56 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I lie to you to gain some advantage.
Easy example is lie on a a home disclosure form to get a higher price.
Tell an old lady you're taking her vacuum order, take her deposit, and never return.
All of those things involve speech, but it's a lie, however the criminality requires the extra steps of the advantage.
We can't just get the a-hole on the fraud? Seems goofy to make it a speech issue.
Posted on 8/29/25 at 5:59 pm to kilo
quote:
Yes, you sure did
When? I think you're confused.
quote:
Show your work.
After you find your previously-quoted language.
Posted on 8/29/25 at 6:00 pm to David_DJS
quote:
We can't just get the a-hole on the fraud? Seems goofy to make it a speech issue.
Well in an absolutist 1A scenario, those aren't crimes. Absolute includes lying.
Posted on 8/29/25 at 6:02 pm to SlowFlowPro
You have a thread on the front page regarding the liberal left judge trying to rule Trump's tariffs are illegal.
Lets see what you got, Im sure you can find the thread on your own. You find all the ones that fit your narratives and "world views" otherwise.
Lets see what you got, Im sure you can find the thread on your own. You find all the ones that fit your narratives and "world views" otherwise.
Posted on 8/29/25 at 6:34 pm to kilo
quote:
You have a thread on the front page regarding the liberal left judge trying to rule Trump's tariffs are illegal.
And?
There is nothing partisan about statutory interpretation.
The much more interesting discussion in that thread is the MAGAtards saying Trump should ignore the Supreme Court if they don't rule his way, making this a partisan issue (and a Constitutional crisis). I did reply to that discussion.
Posted on 8/29/25 at 6:36 pm to FLTech
quote:
Thank God that we have Kash Patel exposing everything
I’m not sure if you are joking or serious?
Yet great play! You will get upvoted either way!
Posted on 8/29/25 at 8:06 pm to Toomer Deplorable
It was
Posted on 8/29/25 at 8:26 pm to hawgfaninc
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Never forget the Dim Mission Statement.........
WAHTEVER IT TAKES.......BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY!!!!!!!
Posted on 8/30/25 at 12:14 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
's been a clear (but openly admitted) policy for a while now, to combat the Contagion Effect.
They scrub it to hide their ideology and motive and then they selectively leak it if its anything racist or promoting that can even remotely resemble right wing rhetoric - Like for instance, HE WAS A REGISTERED REPUBLICAN - yet we have idea about anything else because they lie - They use it to spread narratives.
The instant they hide something or refuse to release things about a person - I already know they were a deranged leftist - Because if they were right wing or again anything they can spin as right wing - Its played on the media ad naseum.
Page 7 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News