- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The Federalist is reporting the Whistleblower’s name: Eric Ciaramella
Posted on 10/30/19 at 7:59 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Posted on 10/30/19 at 7:59 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Without a doubt Eric and Schiff scissor on a regular basis
This post was edited on 10/30/19 at 8:03 pm
0
Posted on 10/30/19 at 8:00 pm to Darth_Vader
quote:
Well, I did ask if you were that stupid. So I shouldn’t be surprised when you answer my question and confirm my suspicions.
You really believe they changed a rule
hilarious 
Posted on 10/30/19 at 8:02 pm to bmy
quote:
It can when it specifically leaves off a requirement to reach the standard of an official whistleblower
No, it can't. There was no legal requirement to begin with.
I know I’m wasting my time trying to explain this to someone as stupid as you. But here goes...
Under the old rules, and old form, this guy would not have been able to file a complaint as all he had was second hand information. At that time the rule was, and form stated, to file a complaint you had to have first hand information of wrongdoing.
So they changed the rule (and the form) to allow complaints based on second hand information just so he could file his complaint.
I know this won’t register in whatever passes for your brain though.
Posted on 10/30/19 at 8:03 pm to Athis
God damn he looks exactly like I thought he would look. What a fricking wormy arse soy bitch. fricking dude needs his brains beat out. This is what our university system is pumping into the system yearly.
Posted on 10/30/19 at 8:05 pm to Darth_Vader
quote:
I know I’m wasting my time trying to explain this to someone as stupid as you. But here goes...
Under the old rules, and old form, this guy would not have been able to file a complaint as all he had was second hand information. At that time the rule was, and form stated, to file a complaint you had to have first hand information of wrongdoing.
So they changed the rule (and the form) to allow complaints based on second hand information just so he could file his complaint.
I know this won’t register in whatever passes for your brain though.
The problem here is that you are just plain wrong.
The rule has not changed. If it has changed it will be very simple for you to link us all to a copy of both versions of the rule
I can't wait to see it
Posted on 10/30/19 at 8:08 pm to bmy
How can trash like you be so dishonest? You are scum.
Liars to your core.
Liars to your core.
Posted on 10/30/19 at 8:13 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
Federal documents reveal that the whistleblower, Eric Ciaramella, previously worked in the Obama administration with former Vice President Joe Biden and former CIA Director John Brennan. RealClear reports that Ciaramella remained there into the Trump administration, and headed the Ukraine desk at the National Security Council, eventually transitioning into the West Wing, until June 2017.
This has been reported since the 1st week. There isn’t any concrete proof yet.
Posted on 10/30/19 at 8:21 pm to bmy
quote:
The rule has not changed. If it has changed it will be very simple for you to link us all to a copy of both versions of the rule
I can't wait to see it
Instructions for the old form...
Read, or have someone help you read, the first sentence of the paragraph where it mentions firsthand information. Also, can you tell us what the bolded and underlined sentence right above the first paragraph says?
Posted on 10/30/19 at 8:23 pm to Darth_Vader
Bmy does want the truth
Posted on 10/30/19 at 8:30 pm to Bourre
So basically Col. Vinkman of the NSC was listening in on the call and he told Eric who also works at the NSC what he heard. There is the 2nd hand info. Eric then goes to Schiff and Schiff hires two of Eric’s buddies from the NSC to his staff. Those staffers then go to Ukraine and meet with Taylor. Complaint is filed and the shot show starts rollin. All because some Col. interpreted the call the be more then it was and HE thought it was improper. All this shite because one guy didn’t like what he heard.
This post was edited on 10/30/19 at 8:40 pm
Posted on 10/30/19 at 8:37 pm to UAinSOUTHAL
Well well.
Posted on 10/30/19 at 8:37 pm to tigersmanager
quote:
Bmy does want the truth
He said he “can’t wait” to see the actual document. So I posted it. Where’d he go?
Posted on 10/30/19 at 8:38 pm to UAinSOUTHAL
Every one of them should have been given their walking papers.
Posted on 10/30/19 at 8:50 pm to CoachChappy
So if This was Queen Hillarys administration wouldnt he be DEAD already,
She would have already cleaned out the the Obama rats already.
Post this schmuck to Angola or Mozambique yesterday.
She would have already cleaned out the the Obama rats already.
Post this schmuck to Angola or Mozambique yesterday.
Posted on 10/30/19 at 9:02 pm to Darth_Vader
Very nice Darth.
Posted on 10/30/19 at 9:06 pm to UAinSOUTHAL
quote:
All because some Col. interpreted the call the be more then it was and HE thought it was improper. All this shite because one guy didn’t like what he heard.
Because Vinkman disagreed with the policy the president was pursuing.
Posted on 10/30/19 at 9:11 pm to UAinSOUTHAL
quote:
So basically Col. Vinkman of the NSC was listening in on the call and he told Eric who also works at the NSC what he heard. There is the 2nd hand info. Eric then goes to Schiff and Schiff hires two of Eric’s buddies from the NSC to his staff. Those staffers then go to Ukraine and meet with Taylor. Complaint is filed and the shot show starts rollin. All because some Col. interpreted the call the be more then it was and HE thought it was improper. All this shite because one guy didn’t like what he heard
Yep
Posted on 10/30/19 at 9:16 pm to UAinSOUTHAL
quote:
So basically Col. Vinkman of the NSC was listening in on the call and he told Eric who also works at the NSC what he heard. There is the 2nd hand info. Eric then goes to Schiff and Schiff hires two of Eric’s buddies from the NSC to his staff. Those staffers then go to Ukraine and meet with Taylor. Complaint is filed and the shot show starts rollin. All because some Col. interpreted the call the be more then it was and HE thought it was improper. All this shite because one guy didn’t like what he heard.
Sounds very plausible.
Posted on 10/30/19 at 9:17 pm to Darth_Vader
quote:
Instructions for the old form...
This isn't the rule. Let's see the two different versions you're talking about
Instructions for a form are clearly not legally binding. The form was wrong and/or misleading and the revisions were to better align the form with the requirements established by legislation.. end of story.
This post was edited on 10/30/19 at 9:22 pm
Posted on 10/30/19 at 9:23 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
How can trash like you be so dishonest? You are scum.
Liars to your core.
Pointing out that the rule has not changed is lying? Funny. I thought the one spreading an obvious falsehood would be the one called a liar.
Page 6 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News