- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The Crown and The Lloyd’s of London Buh Bye Checkmate TRUMP!
Posted on 3/10/26 at 9:18 am to Boomdaddy65201
Posted on 3/10/26 at 9:18 am to Boomdaddy65201
Posted on 3/10/26 at 9:19 am to G2160
quote:Feed to troll (SFP) and he hangs around derailing thread after thread after thread.
No, you, the “libertarian”, clearly don’t understand how tired and predictable your schtick is.
Posted on 3/10/26 at 9:43 am to RT1941
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. SFP was wrong again
This post was edited on 3/10/26 at 9:55 am
Posted on 3/10/26 at 9:45 am to Great Plains Drifter
quote:
That’s not really for you to decide.
How very postmodern of you. So instead of relying on facts, we should rely on...feelings?
quote:
You freely post your opinions on this board and I and others are free to consider history and other levels of context we wish to consider when reading your opinions. You can disagree with that but it’s not your rule to decide.
You're confused. I never said that you can't be wrong, only that I am free to tell you that you're wrong (and explain why).
quote:
Others may have a different perception over the years based on your choice of topics and the side of things you often default to defending.
Facts don't care about your feelings.
Just showing why my dedication to facts/reality is so important
Posted on 3/10/26 at 9:45 am to RT1941
quote:
and he hangs around derailing thread
I'm still focused on laughing at OP and showing how nonsensical and retarded it is. No derailing involved while focusing on that.
Posted on 3/10/26 at 10:04 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
How very postmodern of you. So instead of relying on facts, we should rely on...feelings?
I’m being as matter of fact as I can possibly be.
Your posting history is what it is. Those are simply factual things. Other than me considering you consistently wrong on a variety of things I harbor no animosity or any particular “feels” towards you one way or the other.
I don’t even know you in real life. You might be a great dude to have a beer with for all I know. But in this arena, you’re just a faceless message board poster with opinions like me and everyone else.
It appears as if you hold this image of yourself and maybe getting a little irked (careful of those feels there) that I responded to you that others may hold a different perception of you based on your factual posting history.
Posted on 3/10/26 at 10:10 am to Great Plains Drifter
quote:
Your posting history is what it is. Those are simply factual things.
But we're talking about my actual posts in this thread.
You're describing a framing that has created a bias that's leading you to ignore facts and rely on feelings, which isn't disputing my point in any way. Just because you're using irrelevant facts to frame your feelings to seem reasonable doesn't mean you're discussing facts relevant to the actual discussion (posts with clear meaning actually made in this thread)
quote:
It appears as if you hold this image of yourself and maybe getting a little irked
Irked? No
Posted on 3/10/26 at 10:36 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
You're describing a framing that has created a bias that's leading you to ignore facts and rely on feelings, which isn't disputing my point in any way. Just because you're using irrelevant facts to frame your feelings to seem reasonable doesn't mean you're discussing facts relevant to the actual discussion (posts with clear meaning actually made in this thread)
My good Spock, most human beings are going to utilize history and context (if known) when a speaker is expounding on a particular topic at hand.
You may consider this some gross human frailty and weakness but I would personally disagree with that assessment. It provides people with discernment. A good quality to possess.
Just for fun and example of a loose comparison to your standard ….if you’re going to try and convince me (or maybe others as well) that every single time DJT speaks on a matter that you personally wipe the slate clean and disregard any previous statements or stances he has ever said or held …and just focus on his statements at that time on that matter…
I believe your own post history would make that a challenging assertion for you to prove.
(And I’m glad you are not irked).
Posted on 3/10/26 at 10:38 am to Ailsa
I must admit, I do enjoy this lady and her commentary.
Posted on 3/10/26 at 10:46 am to dafif
quote:
Ironically or not...State Farm pulled out of California before the wildfires destroyed all those homes.
And, that decision was correct for them at the time. Screwed the homeowners though. Also, Florida had/has the massive insurance issues regarding coverages for homes. Basically priced out of the market
Yeah, but they gave notice and pulled out months before.
Lloyd's is doing this in a different manner. Of course premiums stop immediately, and unused portions returned. I am not clear on if they are dropping all coverages, or just claims related to the gulf and war actions.
NOT a good look
Posted on 3/10/26 at 11:21 am to K2LAW
quote:
Then reinsured by Lloyds
There is no insurance actually named Lloyds it's like the Stock Exchange with many companies. Even State Farm has a Lloyd's presence.
Posted on 3/18/26 at 12:26 pm to CitizenK
quote:
There is no insurance actually named Lloyds it's like the Stock Exchange with many companies. Even State Farm has a Lloyd's presence.
Thanks for that but I know what they are. I’ve had the pleasure of dealing with their multiple underwriters on numerous occasions
Popular
Back to top


0





