Started By
Message

re: The Biden regime and US military are actively preparing for a “SIGNIFICANT ATTACK”

Posted on 4/7/24 at 6:11 pm to
Posted by TigerAxeOK
Where I lay my head is home.
Member since Dec 2016
24908 posts
Posted on 4/7/24 at 6:11 pm to
quote:

What he said.   We think a lot alike Patriot. 


So you, also, are ready. Exemplary.

Should the day ever come when that terrible SHTF scenario actually comes to pass, we will both be alright. Perhaps we'll even cross paths one day in trade, commerce and mutual cooperation. The world will need stability. Like minded individuals will be able to provide that stability and find a way to live comfortably in coordination, even if distanced and generally isolated.
Posted by stuckintexas
austin
Member since Sep 2009
2215 posts
Posted on 4/7/24 at 7:32 pm to
quote:

everything they said would happen under Trump has happened under Biden

It's called projection, and no one does it better than the democrats. They'll tell you exactly what they're planning if you pay attention.
Posted by Tantal
Member since Sep 2012
14076 posts
Posted on 4/7/24 at 10:06 pm to
quote:

ARE WE ACTUALLY ON THE BRINK OF WORLD WAR III?

Hyperbole much? Iran doesn't have that many friends. Besides, they're a mountainous land power with a large coastline. The U.S. Navy can shut them down completely within hours.
Posted by beaux duke
Member since Oct 2023
424 posts
Posted on 4/7/24 at 10:16 pm to
quote:

It's called projection, and no one does it better than the democrats. They'll tell you exactly what they're planning if you pay attention.


https://twitter.com/laurenboebert/status/1346811381878845442
Posted by fwtex
Member since Nov 2019
1960 posts
Posted on 4/7/24 at 10:20 pm to
quote:

is the DoD doing saying we are expected AS EARLY AS IN THE NEXT WEEK? It is like when Biden said Putin will invade Ukraine until Putin did it.

we know they are mind numbingly dumb so it isn't a counter intel op of propaganda.


Hmmm, might be onto something. What if our alphabets are involved in all sides of the existing conflicts that they are now orchestrating
Posted by WWII Collector
Member since Oct 2018
7025 posts
Posted on 4/7/24 at 10:22 pm to
Posted by Hot Carl
Prayers up for 3
Member since Dec 2005
59220 posts
Posted on 4/7/24 at 10:42 pm to
quote:

Whatever they do, I anticipate them trying to keep it very "proportional" and not provocative.


What is the virtue of a "proportional" response?
Posted by AquaAg84
Member since May 2013
1408 posts
Posted on 4/7/24 at 11:43 pm to
So preparing for an attack huh? All the while having an open southern border allowing what knows what is already in STATESIDE?
This post was edited on 4/7/24 at 11:45 pm
Posted by Frostynips1
Member since Feb 2022
73 posts
Posted on 4/7/24 at 11:54 pm to
Iran bombed us military facilities with dozens of missiles while president Trump was in office and we did nothing.
Posted by dnm3305
Member since Feb 2009
13602 posts
Posted on 4/8/24 at 12:16 am to
quote:

China is slowly, but steadily advancing their influence and infrastructure from South America now up into Central America including Panama.


And will also be the ones to negotaite a “cease fire” with Russia/Ukraine which will make democracy look weak on the world stage considering America couldn’t get it done for all this time and will simultaneously introduce the yen as the new world currency.
Posted by Lee B
Member since Dec 2018
632 posts
Posted on 4/8/24 at 9:47 pm to
quote:

Maybe we see Muslim nations in the region get together after Ramadan and make a unified plan. Could be disastrous for Israel.


Which Muslim Nations would those be?

No Sunni Arab states will unify with Iran... they actually are no doubt privately cheering for Israel to take out Hamas and Hezbollah and hit Iran even more. There's been a movement for about 20 years to create an Arab NATO-type organization for Sunni states to unify to oppose Iran. This is an ancient struggle.

Remember that ISIS (Sunni) attacked Iran recently, and then Russia for backing Iran and Assad in Syria.

Syria, Lebanon and Yemen are already antagonistic to Israel and the US... the only Shi'ite majority/controlled nation not "officially" in on that is Iraq... by deposing Hussein we actually toppled his Sunni minority ruling government putting the majority Shi'ite population in control, which naturally put them more under the influence of their Shi'ite next-door neighbor, Iran. But most "trouble" coming from the country is on the part of Iranian-backed militias and not the official government, and we've even found ourselves in the strange position occasionally of having to side with the militias against ISIS within Iraq. Bahrain possibly has a Shi'ite majority population but the ruling family are Sunnis... monarchies and non-democratic regimes in the region mean that a lot of the Shi'ite population have no say in foreign policy.

The concern should be for the escalation, in number and severity, of attacks from the same groups already causing trouble on behalf of Iran, but there's nobody left on the bench to join them.


This post was edited on 4/8/24 at 10:08 pm
Posted by Lee B
Member since Dec 2018
632 posts
Posted on 4/8/24 at 10:06 pm to
quote:

Iran bombed us military facilities with dozens of missiles while president Trump was in office and we did nothing.


Well, Trump did kill Iranian Major General Qasem Soleimani eventually... but it just seemed like "huh... why now?"
Posted by NashvilleTider
Your Mom
Member since Jan 2007
11396 posts
Posted on 4/8/24 at 10:07 pm to
Iran doesn’t have nukes - we need to hit them first.
Posted by Lee B
Member since Dec 2018
632 posts
Posted on 4/8/24 at 11:19 pm to
quote:

Iran doesn’t have nukes - we need to hit them first.


Iran has lived in fear of that since 9/11... at that point, they were actually pretty isolated on the global stage. The Khomeini regime is not popular and there's been resistance and protests in the streets there since they took power in 1979 (the Revolution promised Democracy and self-determination, then pulled a "Lenin" instantly with "well... you are not fit to govern yourself, best we do it for you (in line with the Prophet's intentions)."

There's a bit of Cuba-like situation with an ex-pat Iranian community pushing for the Mullahs to be overthrown so they can return to reclaim things... there was actually "competition" between this community and the Iraqi version for "invade our country, you'll be welcomed as Liberators" in the early 00s, and Iraq won out for whatever reasons...

The turning point in any revolution comes when the military and police find themselves face-to-face with their neighbors, friends and relatives in the streets, and they turn... and that spreads up the command chain because nobody wants to be the one beaten to death by the mob, until the top brass either signal that they're stepping aside and letting the revolution reach its bloody conclusion (the leader/leaders killed if they haven't hauled butt out of dodge, already) or they claim solidarity with the people and stage a coup in their name, promising to prosecute the former rulers and institute reforms. The Khomeinis learned from the revolution that put them in power, and they've stayed in power by drafting "riot Police" from the rural areas, paying them 2 years their normal wages for herding sheep or whatever to put on a uniform for a few weeks and come beat or shoot protestors, who to them are strangers... urban people they hate, anyway, because they have a much higher standard of living and there are some tribal rivalries.

Iran is a powder keg, and the regime fears the US "helping" their population overthrow them, and that's why they've concentrated on funding allies in the region... Hamas, Hezbollah, The Houthis in Yemen, Assad in Syria, and forming stronger relations with the non-Democratic countries of the world, mainly Russia, China, and North Korea...

As much as the majority of their population would like to be rid of Khomenei and his Mullahs, as we learned in Iraq, things get weird when you're invading a country... and Iranians in particular do not trust the US because we engineered the return of Shah to power after he'd been Democratically deposed in the 1950s and the new government tried to nationalize the oil industry, which threw out the extremely favorable deal British Petroleum had set up for itself on promises to keep the Shah in power when the country was reconstituted with the fall of the Ottoman Empire at the end of WWI.

Something to keep an eye on is the emergence of "BRICS" as a counter to "G7," initially (pardon the pun) consisting of Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa... but expanding to include Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, the United Arab Emirates, and possibly Saudi Arabia...

So that's some "strange bedfellows" in one organization, right? Iran + Egypt and Saudi Arabia and the UAE?

So what's the one thing all of those countries have in common?

Well, they say it is "the Global South being ignored by the North American/European powers," but it appears to be either non-Democratic rule or elements of Nationalist hostility and some questionable human rights activities (yes, even India... Hindu Supremism and the oppression of Muslims and other minority groups is a big problem there). No regime/government like that wants to be the last one standing...

This post was edited on 4/8/24 at 11:23 pm
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram