- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
The 18th Witness
Posted on 1/31/20 at 10:03 pm
Posted on 1/31/20 at 10:03 pm
Can someone explain this to me, I am out of the loop on it?
I know they actually deposed 17, but was there info insinuating that Schiff spoke with an 18th and used that info too? e.g. He spoke with the whistleblower
I know they actually deposed 17, but was there info insinuating that Schiff spoke with an 18th and used that info too? e.g. He spoke with the whistleblower
9
Posted on 1/31/20 at 10:06 pm to Lsut81
quote:
Can someone explain this to me, I am out of the loop on it?
Good question. #mealso
Posted on 1/31/20 at 10:07 pm to Lsut81
No it was Michael Atkinson. He called it an executive interview or something instead of a witness Deposition. So they had 18 testimonies but Schiff only sent 17 because
Atkinson would have sank this before they even authorized impeachment proceedings.
Atkinson would have sank this before they even authorized impeachment proceedings.
This post was edited on 1/31/20 at 10:08 pm
Posted on 1/31/20 at 10:08 pm to Lsut81
The 18th witness is Michael Atkinson, the ICIG. His testimony was never released. It is rumored it exposes Schiff’s coordination with the WB, EC.
Posted on 1/31/20 at 10:08 pm to davyjones
Atkinson’s testimony was never released, and it was supposedly devestating to the Whistleblower and Schiff’s case...They hid it on purpose, this whole thing was a sham...
Posted on 1/31/20 at 10:09 pm to Lsut81
18th witness was IG who laid out cooperation with Schiff and Ciaramella. Not a good look for Schiff, so he will not allow it into the record.
Posted on 1/31/20 at 10:10 pm to CamdenTiger
quote:
Atkinson’s testimony was never released, and it was supposedly devestating to the Whistleblower and Schiff’s case...They hid it on purpose, this whole thing was a sham...
Ahhh, now that makes sense
Posted on 1/31/20 at 10:11 pm to Bigtime92
Kevin McCarthy said if the Rs win back the House it will be released.
Posted on 1/31/20 at 10:12 pm to Lsut81
Can the Senate now investigate the impeacher and have the ICIG testify before them?
It's time. It's Schiff's turn to be investigated.
It's time. It's Schiff's turn to be investigated.
Posted on 1/31/20 at 10:12 pm to Lsut81
The 18th witness was the Intelligence Community Inspector General, Michael Atkinson. Apparently he blew up Schiff's story and exposed the whistleblower. In a regular court holding that back would be like holding back exculpatory evidence but apparently that's something that's permissable when you're in the middle of a TDS-fueled impeachment.
Posted on 1/31/20 at 10:17 pm to Lsut81
There was an 18th witness deposed in the secret house bunker. His testimony is the only testimony that has been withheld and the dems refuse to declassify it.
People who witnessed and have reviewed the testimony, but are legally barred from discussing it due to its ridiculous classification, have said that it reveals damning evidence of coordination between Adam Schiff's staff, the WB and Vindman. This coordination began well before the WB filing. It also reveals that all those involved in this efford had past close relationships and were holdovers of the Obama admin.
People who witnessed and have reviewed the testimony, but are legally barred from discussing it due to its ridiculous classification, have said that it reveals damning evidence of coordination between Adam Schiff's staff, the WB and Vindman. This coordination began well before the WB filing. It also reveals that all those involved in this efford had past close relationships and were holdovers of the Obama admin.
Posted on 1/31/20 at 10:17 pm to PanhandleTigah
quote:
Kevin McCarthy said if the Rs win back the House it will be released.
This rule needs to be changed. Enough of this majority bullshite.
Posted on 1/31/20 at 10:21 pm to Lsut81
Posted on 1/31/20 at 10:22 pm to McChowder
quote:
People who witnessed and have reviewed the testimony, but are legally barred from discussing it due to its ridiculous classification, have said that it reveals damning evidence of coordination between Adam Schiff's staff, the WB and Vindman. This coordination began well before the WB filing. It also reveals that all those involved in this efford had past close relationships and were holdovers of the Obama admin.
But if we have co-equal branches of gov't, why is the legislative able to block the executive from reviewing/access to the testimony of an executive official?
Posted on 1/31/20 at 10:23 pm to McChowder
quote:
His testimony is the only testimony that has been withheld and the dems refuse to declassify it.
Does the presidents council not have legal access to it??? How is that even possible that they can interview someone as part of a prosecution and not share that with the defense?
Posted on 1/31/20 at 10:34 pm to CamdenTiger
quote:
Atkinson’s testimony was never released, and it was supposedly devestating to the Whistleblower and Schiff’s case...
Posted on 1/31/20 at 10:38 pm to Hurricane Mike
quote:WAT??
This rule needs to be changed. Enough of this majority bullshite.
Schiff and the Media are now impugning Cippilone’s character, calling him a fact witness who should’ve recused himself. Pot meet MFing kettle. Had that 18th transcript been released that sleezebag would’ve been exposed.
This post was edited on 2/1/20 at 10:11 pm
Posted on 1/31/20 at 10:39 pm to PanhandleTigah
quote:
WAT??
He;s saying that the majority shouldn’t be able to hide that testimony and the majority bullshite needs to end.
Posted on 1/31/20 at 10:42 pm to Lsut81
quote:No, they were not given access. Schiff is a snake and I hope he is exposed and expelled from the House come Jan 2021.
Does the presidents council not have legal access to it??? How is that even possible that they can interview someone as part of a prosecution and not share that with the defense?
Posted on 1/31/20 at 10:46 pm to PanhandleTigah
quote:
No, they were not given access.
So why hasn’t his council sued for that information?
I thought the prosecution had to turn over everything to the defense? Or is there some hidden bullshite when it comes to impeachment?
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News