- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: TDS also stands for Thomas Derangement Syndrome
Posted on 1/3/25 at 9:13 am to Mickey Goldmill
Posted on 1/3/25 at 9:13 am to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
by Mickey Goldmill
Man bonds shut you down real quick
Run along now
Posted on 1/3/25 at 9:18 am to BBONDS25
A Sorosite went to a neighborhood potluck dinner. Several of his neighbors noticed that every time he touched a serving utensil he would dig deeply in his nose, extract a crusty bugger, and attach it to the handle of the utensil. Frustrated, several of the neighbors approached and asked him to refrain from his disgusting behavior.
“Racists!!!” He cried, and marched out to share his discovery with anyone who would hear.
Identify a Sorosite, isolate them, then eradicate them!!!
“Racists!!!” He cried, and marched out to share his discovery with anyone who would hear.
Identify a Sorosite, isolate them, then eradicate them!!!
This post was edited on 1/3/25 at 9:36 am
Posted on 1/3/25 at 9:19 am to VOR
So Thomas is compromised, but not Biden, Pelosi, AOC, or Schumer?
Posted on 1/3/25 at 9:20 am to Mickey Goldmill
After the character assassination attempts by your party against Thomas that continues today I give him a pass in all things that make you guys wretch till the sun fades.
Posted on 1/3/25 at 9:26 am to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
Because I'm not making an allegation. Investigating something does not mean an allegation is being made.
That’s precisely what the U.S. judicial conference did. Why would you say something needs to be investigated when it already was?
quote:
Food and Lodging atPrivate Club
Which Code provides that this is a reportable gift?
Which court can make a negative inference based upon an amended disclosure?
Stop insinuating impropriety. You’re an attorney. Make your allegation. Stop muddying the water and being intentionally deceitful.
This post was edited on 1/3/25 at 9:28 am
Posted on 1/3/25 at 9:43 am to Mickey Goldmill
Fix the court?
Let me guess. Radical left organization?
Never heard of them before.
Let me guess. Radical left organization?
Never heard of them before.
Posted on 1/3/25 at 9:44 am to BBONDS25
quote:
That’s precisely what the U.S. judicial conference did. Why would you say something needs to be investigated when it already was?
And I'm good with their conclusion. Again, this was more about the TDS remark than anything specific going forward regarding Thomas. The prior investigations into Thomas regarding his financial disclosures were, imo, warranted. That appears to be supported by his amendments and the adoption of new ethical rules for the SCOTUS that more clearly define what has to be reported.
Posted on 1/3/25 at 9:45 am to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
And I'm good with their conclusion. Again, this was more about the TDS remark than anything specific going forward regarding Thomas.
As evidenced by you posting a deceitful chart from a far left organization?
Posted on 1/3/25 at 9:48 am to BBONDS25
That chart sure has some of y'all triggered. Want me to take it down?
Posted on 1/3/25 at 9:53 am to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
That chart sure has some of y'all triggered. Want me to take it down?
Typical liberal projection. Thomas has you so triggered that you were intentionally deceitful in an attempt to smear him.
When pressed, the “gift” you allege was lodging and food at a private club. Yet the chart you posted claims Thomas received 2.4MM in gifts. Is that the value you assign to the lodging and meals or were you being intentionally deceitful because Thomas triggers you?
Posted on 1/3/25 at 10:07 am to BBONDS25
I honestly didn't think someone would take it so seriously
One of the two trips he took with Crow was to Bali. On a private jet. 9 days spent there on a yacht.
One of the two trips he took with Crow was to Bali. On a private jet. 9 days spent there on a yacht.
Posted on 1/3/25 at 10:09 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Now do Nancy Pelosi.
Posted on 1/3/25 at 10:30 am to Mickey Goldmill
It took seconds of searching to figuring who exactly Fix the court is, how they were founded and by whom.
Posted on 1/3/25 at 12:22 pm to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
One of the two trips he took with Crow was to Bali. On a private jet. 9 days spent there on a yacht.
Does that trip cost 2.4MM you think?? I have a close friend that is a billionaire. I’ve flown with him to his boat. Did I fail to report a gift to the IRS? Has Crow had a single case in front of the USSC? Or are you just deceitfully slinging shite at a sitting Justice?
Posted on 1/3/25 at 12:39 pm to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
Don't y'all usually hate on 'bought and paid for' politicians?
Don’t yall usually support reparations?
Posted on 1/3/25 at 1:05 pm to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
I honestly didn't think someone would take it so seriously
You’re taking my deceitful chart too seriously. It wasn’t meant to stand up to scrutiny, just make a statement!
This post was edited on 1/3/25 at 1:06 pm
Posted on 1/3/25 at 1:11 pm to Mickey Goldmill
Hell no don't take it down. It's like a yard sign.
"Political Hack Lives Here".
"Political Hack Lives Here".
Posted on 1/3/25 at 1:52 pm to SDVTiger
quote:
Source: Fix the court
Of course he posts a far left source
But they're experts so we should accept their data as accurate without any scrutiny.
Posted on 1/3/25 at 2:34 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Does that trip cost 2.4MM you think?? I have a close friend that is a billionaire. I’ve flown with him to his boat. Did I fail to report a gift to the IRS? Has Crow had a single case in front of the USSC? Or are you just deceitfully slinging shite at a sitting Justice?
You’re missing the whole point of the disclosure rules. Has nothing to do with IRS law. Never said he broke any law. Never said he should have recused himself on any case.
The disclosures are there so you know in advance if there are potential conflicts. After the initial reporting was done on all the trips Thomas took with Crow, the rules were updated to be even more clear that those trips should be disclosed.
Popular
Back to top


1





