- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Supreme Court - Friday Release Day
Posted on 6/24/22 at 9:23 am to BHTiger
Posted on 6/24/22 at 9:23 am to BHTiger
quote:
Shocked by 6-3, even Roberts. Guess he wasn't the leak trying to get others to turn.
a post on SCOTUSblog
quote:
Robert's concurrence reads more like a dissent really - admonishing the court for a lack of judicial restraint in not rendering a more narrow opinion that wouldn't have overruled Roe and Casey.
3
Posted on 6/24/22 at 9:23 am to rt3
quote:
WRITTEN BY ALITO... WITH THOMAS, GORSUCH, & BARRETT
KAV & ROBERTS CONCURRING
I'll be honest, that definitely shocked me. I never would've believed that Roberts would've concurred on this. I was fully expecting a 5-4 vote.
Posted on 6/24/22 at 9:24 am to rt3
quote:
Robert's concurrence reads more like a dissent really - admonishing the court for a lack of judicial restraint in not rendering a more narrow opinion that wouldn't have overruled Roe and Casey.
Roberts can get bent.
Posted on 6/24/22 at 9:24 am to BugAC
quote:
What is the name of the case about removing non-elected agency powers from creating legislation?
West Virginia v Environmental Protection Agency
Posted on 6/24/22 at 9:24 am to BHTiger
Thanks to McConnell for that ballsy block of Garland. For that we got Gorsuch and no way for Roberts to worm over to a potential Kagan, Soto, Breyer and Garland side of this.
Posted on 6/24/22 at 9:25 am to xxTIMMYxx
quote:
I can’t believe they did this on a Friday
More time for the Justices to get out of Dodge
Posted on 6/24/22 at 9:26 am to Jake88
quote:
"Whatever the exact scope of the coming laws," the dissenters write, "one result of today's decision is certain: the curtailment of women's rights, and of their status as free and equal citizens."
"Women's rights"?
What the f*ck is that?
How in the ever living f*ck can this curtail women's rights when Biden's latest Affirmative Action FAILURE pick can't even tell us how to define a woman is???
Posted on 6/24/22 at 9:28 am to rt3
quote:
a post on SCOTUSblog
quote:
Robert's concurrence reads more like a dissent really - admonishing the court for a lack of judicial restraint in not rendering a more narrow opinion that wouldn't have overruled Roe and Casey.
Then that makes more sense coming from him.
But if he truly felt that the court should've showed more restraint, and not overruled Roe & Casey, then he should've just dissented instead of trying to hide behind this type of "two-faced" concurrence.
This post was edited on 6/24/22 at 9:29 am
Posted on 6/24/22 at 9:28 am to rt3
Sounds like the majority forced Roberts hand
Posted on 6/24/22 at 9:30 am to Bourre
quote:
Sounds like the majority forced Roberts hand
yep.
they weren't bending, so in an effort to protect the Court's reputation, he concurred so it would be a 6-3 opinion on paper.
Posted on 6/24/22 at 9:32 am to Bamatab
quote:
quote:
a post on SCOTUSblog
quote:
Robert's concurrence reads more like a dissent really - admonishing the court for a lack of judicial restraint in not rendering a more narrow opinion that wouldn't have overruled Roe and Casey.
He came into this position promising to make the Court less politicized, yet no Chief Justice has politicized the Supreme Court more than this OBVIOUSLY F*CKING COMPROMISED piece of pure f*cking FILTH.
His "concurrence" is strictly political in nature. There is NO REASON why the Court shouldn't have ruled on the Constitutionality of abortion. Piecemealing decisions so as not to piss off your political enemies is the definition of politicizing the Court.
Posted on 6/24/22 at 9:34 am to choupiquesushi
quote:
no pro lifers rioted when Roe came down
I missed the looting and burning and gnashing of teeth.
Posted on 6/24/22 at 9:35 am to Jake88
quote:
Thanks to McConnell for that ballsy block of Garland. For that we got Gorsuch and no way for Roberts to worm over to a potential Kagan, Soto, Breyer and Garland side of this.
McConnell gets a lot of crap, most of which is well deserved, but all conservatives better be extremely thankful that he took his stand in blocking Garland.
The crazy thing was that the Dems were touting Garland as very moderate, and someone conservatives shouldn't worry about. But now that he's AG, and he has proven to be far from moderate...and by far I mean light years from moderate.
Posted on 6/24/22 at 9:36 am to NashvilleTider
quote:
homeland security Has warned Catholic churches to be on guard to this weekend.
That's some weird shite.
Posted on 6/24/22 at 9:36 am to themunch
CNN's Chief Masturbator apparently reports the majority opinion is almost identical to the leaked draft
Posted on 6/24/22 at 9:37 am to Bamatab
This is such a GREAT day!
Posted on 6/24/22 at 9:38 am to udtiger
Which means we'll probably lose the epa ruling.
Posted on 6/24/22 at 9:38 am to BlackHelicopterPilot
quote:
I was gonna ask to explain the next one to me like I have gold in my grill but NOT in my investment portfolio.
Damnit Man.
:rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao:
Posted on 6/24/22 at 9:40 am to angryslugs
quote:
Which means we'll probably lose the epa ruling.
Idk if you read the tea leaves with a couple different decisions they've made now, the Court has essentially decided to ignore the Chevron defense.
It could very well be the case in WV v EPA. As long as Chevron continues to be ignored, its an overall win
Page 7 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News