Started By
Message

re: Southern poverty law center indicted by grand jury. Laundered $ to white supremacy groups

Posted on 4/21/26 at 6:36 pm to
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
76527 posts
Posted on 4/21/26 at 6:36 pm to
Sounds like a party
Posted by AlterEd
Cydonia, Mars
Member since Dec 2024
12023 posts
Posted on 4/21/26 at 6:42 pm to
Imo this goes beyond simple money laundering and racketeering. There is a social engineering aspect to this that should see anyone involved jailed for life. This sort of shite has a profound negative impact on our society.

Think of all the race riots and the like. These mother frickers were stoking those flames.
This post was edited on 4/21/26 at 6:46 pm
Posted by Ailsa
Member since May 2020
8465 posts
Posted on 4/21/26 at 6:46 pm to
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
quote:

They're gonna WALK EVERYBODY THROUGH IT, how SPLC was literally paying 'hate group' informants to do commit crimes/entrap people for prosecution.

Then they're gonna PEEL BACK THE NEXT LAYER and show you the ORGANIZED CRIME FRONT that was masquerading as an FBI for decades doing this EXACT SAME shite.

Paying informants in these 'criminal groups' to either commit crimes so the FBI could move in and 'investigate', entrapping a bunch of patsies.

It was A VERY LUCRATIVE BUSINESS MODEL.

And it's all gonna be exposed and prosecuted.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
167573 posts
Posted on 4/21/26 at 6:47 pm to
quote:

Lack of Public Disclosure on Large Corporate Donors SPLC does not publicly disclose a detailed list of its large individual or corporate donors on its website or in summary financial materials. Like many nonprofits, it reports aggregate contribution totals on IRS Form 990s but generally does not itemize specific donors beyond what is required for Schedule B (which lists contributors of $5,000+ but is often not fully public or redacted for privacy in accessible versions). ProPublica’s Nonprofit Explorer and the SPLC’s own financial pages confirm this aggregate approach without naming specific corporations as major direct funders.


Posted by rwestmore7
Member since Nov 2007
1004 posts
Posted on 4/21/26 at 6:47 pm to
There is an indictment, but it alleges fraud tied to paid informants inside extremist groups. That’s not the same thing as “supporting white supremacy.”

But of course we take X posts as facts here when the actual charges have been skewed.
Posted by AlterEd
Cydonia, Mars
Member since Dec 2024
12023 posts
Posted on 4/21/26 at 6:49 pm to
quote:

There is an indictment, but it alleges fraud tied to paid informants inside extremist groups. That’s not the same thing as “supporting white supremacy.”


Umm, yes it is.
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
65894 posts
Posted on 4/21/26 at 6:50 pm to
quote:

There is an indictment, but it alleges fraud tied to paid informants inside extremist groups. That’s not the same thing as “supporting white supremacy.”


Yes it is. They aren't law enforcement.

ETA: Actually, I wouldn't want law enforcement directing money to groups like this either.

Remember when the "kidnapping" of that one governor turned out to be completely conceived by government agents?
This post was edited on 4/21/26 at 6:52 pm
Posted by AlterEd
Cydonia, Mars
Member since Dec 2024
12023 posts
Posted on 4/21/26 at 6:50 pm to
Imagine my surprise to not see our resident legal eagles in this thread commenting on this.
Posted by Lsupimp
Ersatz Amerika-97.6% phony & fake
Member since Nov 2003
86173 posts
Posted on 4/21/26 at 6:51 pm to
And still , the 72 year old white women will learn the slogans, feign the outrage, demand to speak to the manager of racism, and write their checks. They are true believers and the SPLC is as sacred as a jar full of Bernie Sanders farts.
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
122919 posts
Posted on 4/21/26 at 6:51 pm to
Aren’t you a donor to the poverty law center?
Posted by rwestmore7
Member since Nov 2007
1004 posts
Posted on 4/21/26 at 6:52 pm to
Exactly my point. Take the X post as gospel and don’t read the actual indictment.
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
91563 posts
Posted on 4/21/26 at 6:52 pm to
quote:

jailed for life
You’re way too kind
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
65894 posts
Posted on 4/21/26 at 6:52 pm to
quote:

Aren’t you a donor to the poverty law center?


If so, I hope he's indicted as a co-conspirator.
Posted by AlterEd
Cydonia, Mars
Member since Dec 2024
12023 posts
Posted on 4/21/26 at 6:54 pm to
quote:

Exactly my point.


You don't have a point. The SPLC is not a law enforcement agency. They can't claim they were paying "informants." They were paying members of the group.
Posted by rwestmore7
Member since Nov 2007
1004 posts
Posted on 4/21/26 at 6:54 pm to
You’re mixing three different things: paying sources, fraud allegations, and ideological support. Those are not the same thing. And the Whitmer plot claim is revisionist nonsense.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
167573 posts
Posted on 4/21/26 at 6:54 pm to
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
122919 posts
Posted on 4/21/26 at 6:54 pm to
His wife’s boyfriend will be there to raise their kid
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
167573 posts
Posted on 4/21/26 at 6:55 pm to
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
65894 posts
Posted on 4/21/26 at 6:55 pm to
quote:

You’re mixing three different things: paying sources, fraud allegations, and ideological support. Those are not the same thing. And the Whitmer plot claim is revisionist nonsense.


Amazing. Everything you said is false.
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
122919 posts
Posted on 4/21/26 at 6:55 pm to
Explain your point for us, please.
Jump to page
Page First 2 3 4 5 6 ... 23
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 23Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram