- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: So the tranny going before the SC today is named Hecox
Posted on 1/13/26 at 12:33 pm to Sid E Walker
Posted on 1/13/26 at 12:33 pm to Sid E Walker
He claims to be female, but we can still see hecox.
0
Posted on 1/13/26 at 1:54 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
The question is whether the Constitution ALLOWS institutions to exclude them.
Well, the constitution doesn't explicitly say that you can't have sex with children. I guess if a state wants to make it legal to rape a 4 yr old, then we just have no choice, because by not specifically denying it means it is allowed.
Or... we can just use common sense.
The whole idea that we should do what is legal instead what is right is retarded.
Posted on 1/13/26 at 2:10 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
You are correct. But…the underlying question is whether one should be able to (legally)self identify as something he/she is not.
Posted on 1/13/26 at 2:24 pm to TenWheelsForJesus
I'm wondering what's legally stopping an able-bodied man from joining the special Olympics at this point.
People are just shitting all over the point of having a women-only division
People are just shitting all over the point of having a women-only division
Posted on 1/13/26 at 5:16 pm to Sid E Walker
New meaning to "Oral" Argument?
Posted on 1/13/26 at 5:36 pm to captainFid
Sounds like the name of an Ewok
Posted on 1/14/26 at 9:09 am to RelentlessAnalysis
Attorney's for the plaintiff are making the argument I just made in support of their case. I heard them do it.
Posted on 1/14/26 at 9:23 am to Laugh More
quote:
I’m so confused.
So are they.
Posted on 1/14/26 at 9:26 am to TenWheelsForJesus
quote:
Well, the constitution doesn't explicitly say that you can't have sex with children. I guess if a state wants to make it legal to rape a 4 yr old, then we just have no choice, because by not specifically denying it means it is allowed.
You know the founding fathers could see a day where mentally ill men would demand to be identified as women, and morons in the populace would all bend over and agree.
Idiocracy is here.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News