- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
So democrats had record turn out in New Hampshire and Nevada
Posted on 2/23/20 at 6:12 am
Posted on 2/23/20 at 6:12 am
quote:
Democrats assumed that caucus and primary turnout would be gangbusters, driven by grassroots energy to defeat President Trump.
But New Hampshire painted a different picture, with a record 300,000 people turning out, blowing past the 288,000 who voted in the 2008 primary.
And now it appears that Nevada is headed for record turnout as well.
More than 75,000 people participated in the early caucuses, not far behind the 84,000 who voted in the contests for both parties in 2016.
The final numbers aren’t in yet, but early returns show that about half of the electorate in Nevada is voting for the first time. Nevada Democrats said they received 10,000 new applications to join the party over the week of early voting.
LINK
10
Posted on 2/23/20 at 6:18 am to Northwestern tiger
Whenever anything is considered "grassroots" when it comes to Democrat voters.. there's normally a billionaire funding everything from the back.
Posted on 2/23/20 at 6:19 am to Northwestern tiger
Bernie’s canvassing and voter activation drives are off the charts.
Posted on 2/23/20 at 6:46 am to Northwestern tiger
Numbers are prolly horse shite...
Posted on 2/23/20 at 6:52 am to Northwestern tiger
A number of reports were saying there were completely unmanned voting stations. Numbers are definitely fudged
Posted on 2/23/20 at 7:05 am to Knight of Old
Trial run for November democrat vote fraud coming
Posted on 2/23/20 at 7:14 am to Knight of Old
quote:
Numbers are prolly horse shite...
your complacency is not shared by our
twittering potus.
the loathing people feel for your orange overlord is effective motivation.
Posted on 2/23/20 at 7:15 am to Upperdecker
quote:
A number of reports were saying there were completely unmanned voting stations
cognitive dissonance is a bitch.
Posted on 2/23/20 at 7:17 am to CelticDog
quote:
the loathing people feel for your orange overlord is effective motivation
This is just sad
You are all two year olds
Posted on 2/23/20 at 7:20 am to Upperdecker
quote:
A number of reports were saying there were completely unmanned voting stations. Numbers are definitely fudged
lets see/hear your reports.
alt-right twitter says it.
friend re-tweets.
rinse repeat.
Posted on 2/23/20 at 7:48 am to CelticDog
Ahhh your fervor to be a communist...
Posted on 2/23/20 at 8:05 am to Bayoubred
quote:In all honesty that dog really is better off having DimProgFilth do all his thinking for him.
Ahhh your fervor to be a communist...
The rest of us? Not by a long shot.
Posted on 2/23/20 at 8:26 am to Northwestern tiger
I trust the numbers, I think alot of rebublicans, indpendents and Russians are crossing over to vote. It certainly make for the down ballot candidate races interesting.
Posted on 2/23/20 at 8:29 am to Northwestern tiger
I'm glad these numbers are being reported, true or not. It should be a warning to Republicans not to get complacent in November. Bernie Sanders, if he is the nominee, will bring out a large and enthusiastic base come Election Day.
He being the nominee could do wonders for GOP turnout because no one on our side (save maybe Joe Walsh) wants a socialist in the White House.
He being the nominee could do wonders for GOP turnout because no one on our side (save maybe Joe Walsh) wants a socialist in the White House.
Posted on 2/23/20 at 8:32 am to CelticDog
quote:
lets see/hear your reports.
alt-right twitter says it.
friend re-tweets.
rinse repeat.
Well dipshit
NDA
What are they hiding?
(4 weeks)
Posted on 2/23/20 at 8:53 am to Northwestern tiger
What that article doesn’t state is NH and Nevada has way more registered Ds now then back in 2008 so looking at 2008 numbers vs now isn’t painting the full picture. You have to correlate the percent of registered voters to turnout.
Dems were expecting 350k in NH to break 2008. 47% of registered Dems voted in 2008 only 42% in 2020.
Nevada needs 160k to break 2008.
Dems were expecting 350k in NH to break 2008. 47% of registered Dems voted in 2008 only 42% in 2020.
Nevada needs 160k to break 2008.
Posted on 2/23/20 at 9:24 am to Northwestern tiger
quote:
And now it appears that Nevada is headed for record turnout as well.
More than 75,000 people participated in the early caucuses, not far behind the 84,000 who voted in the contests for both parties in 2016.
So fewer people voted early in 2020 than 2016 but that means Nevada is headed for record turnout? What?
Posted on 2/23/20 at 10:25 am to Upperdecker
quote:
. Numbers are definitely fudged
ALL Dem/leftist numbers are fudged. Accuracy is racist.
Posted on 2/23/20 at 10:38 am to Plx1776
free beer and pop star music
Posted on 2/23/20 at 10:45 am to MFn GIMP
quote:Yea, I’m confused too.
So fewer people voted early in 2020 than 2016 but that means Nevada is headed for record turnout? What?
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News